Dynamics of Changes in Literacy Culture in the Social Media Era: Comparative Study of the Millennial Generation and Generation Z

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i12.15885

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dynamics of changes in literacy culture in the social media era with a focus on millennials and generation Z. The presence of social media has changed the way individuals access, process and share information. A comparative study method was used to compare the influence of social media on literacy culture between millennials and generation Z. Data was collected through structured surveys and interviews involving participants from both generations. The variables observed included reading frequency, types of literature consumed, sources of information used, and patterns of sharing information through social media. The results of the study show that there is a significant difference between the millennial generation and generation Z in terms of the influence of social media on literacy culture. Millennials tend to read digital content more often and use social media as the main source of information. Meanwhile, generation Z tends to be more active in sharing information through social media and using special social media platforms to expand their literacy reach.

Keywords: social media, millennial generation, generation Z, literacy culture

References

Rusydiyah EF, Zaini Tamin AR, Rahman MR. Literacy Policy in Southeast Asia: A Comparative Study between Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Cent. Educ. Policy Stud. J. 2023;13(2): https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1214

R. BR, A. Mundiri, and L. Nuril, “INTERNALIZATION OF RELIGIOUS MODERATION EDUCATION THROUGH CULTURE LITERACY WITH A NATIONAL INSIGHT,” Edureligia J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 07, no. 01, 2023.

Mastur M. Library Management Strategy to Strengthen Literacy Culture in Elementary Schools. J. Basicedu. 2023;7(1):964–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i1.4758

Wilson-Lopez A, Minichiello A, Green T, Hartman C, Garlick J. A Comparative Case Study of Engineers’ Literacy Practices and Implications for Transformative Disciplinary Literacy Pedagogies in Engineering Education. Read Res Q. 2022;57(4):1129– 47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.476

Long Y, Jia C, Luo X, Sun Y, Zuo W, Wu Y, et al. The Impact of Higher Education on Health Literacy: A Comparative Study between Urban and Rural China. Sustainability (Basel). 2022;14(19):12142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912142

Ross AD, Rouse SM. (Young) Generations as Social Identities: The Role of Latino*Millennial/Generation Z in Shaping Attitudes About Climate Change. Polit Behav. 2022;44(3):1105–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09649-8

Basili C, Sacchanand C, Tammaro AM, Wimolsittichai N. The Role of Policies on Teaching Information Literacy in Higher Education: A Comparative Study in Italy and Thailand. Int Inf Libr Rev. 2022;54(4):354–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2022.2124832

Hamna H, Ummah BK MK. Science Literacy in Elementary Schools: A Comparative Study of Flipped Learning and Hybrid Learning Models. Dasar. 2022;9(2):132–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v9i2.19667

J. G. Korompis and W. J. F. Tumbuan, “THE INFLUENCE OF BRAND AMBASSADOR AND BRAND IMAGE ON E-COMMERCE PURCHASE DECISION AT TOKOPEDIA MARKETPLACE (STUDY ON MILLENNIAL AND GENERATION Z IN MANADO),” 903 J. EMBA, vol. 10, 2022.

Rovagnati V, Pitt E, Winstone N. Feedback cultures, histories and literacies: international postgraduate students’ experiences. Assess Eval High Educ. 2022;47(3):347– 59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1916431

Shalikhah ND, Argandika YP, Gunawan T, Ichsanto MR, Anjani PP, Octaviani IN. Empowerment of Alam Kalijaga reading house to improve literacy culture of the Nasri Hamlet, Grabag, Magelang. Community Empower. 2022;7(9): https://doi.org/10.31603/ce.7144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31603/ce.7144

Kurniawan R, Setiyaningsih LA, Sofyan I. Islamic Boarding School Journalism As a Way of Strengthening Literacy Culture. Mediat. J. Komun. 2022;15(1):41–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v15i1.9493

K. Kreslins, M. Rihards Ikse, G. Dreijers, and T. Vasiljeva, “Digital Literacy, Digital Culture and Digitalization in Europe,” J. Internet E-bus. Stud., 2022, https://doi.org/10.5171/2022.193158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5171/2022.193158

Al Anshori HA, Baharun H, Hamada SE, Hasanah N. DIGITAL LITERACY CULTURE IN MILENIAL STUDENTS AT BOARDING SCHOOLS. EDURELIGIA J. Pendidik. Agama Islam. 2022;6(2):204–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/edureligia.v6i2.4741

Feuerstein M. Review: Digital and Media Literacy: Connecting Culture and Classroom (2011). J Media Lit Educ. 2022;: https://doi.org/10.23860/jmle-4-1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23860/jmle-4-1-11

Baharun H, Wahid AH, Qodriyah K, Wahyuni S, Fatmawati F. Building a Literacy Culture Based on Local Wisdom through Women’s Leadership. J. Obs. J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini. 2022;6(4):2533–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i4.2044

Marmoah S, Poerwanti Suharno JI. Literacy culture management of elementary school in Indonesia. Heliyon. 2022 Apr;8(4):e09315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09315

Liagkis MK. The Socio-Pedagogical Dynamics of Religious Knowledge in Religious Education: A Participatory Action-Research in Greek Secondary Schools on Understanding Diversity. Religions (Basel). 2022;13(5):395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13050395

Mahyudin MA. Habib, and Sulvinajayanti, “DINAMIKA PENGARUSUTAMAAN MODERASI BERAGAMA DALAM PERKEMBANGAN MASYARAKAT DIGITAL,”. ASKETIK. 2022;6(1): https://doi.org/10.30762/asketik.v6i1.181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30762/asketik.v6i1.181

Wahyuni LD, Ariyani M, Hutomo BA. A Comparative Study: The Demographic Differences of Game Literacy. Res. Dev. J. Educ. 2021;7(2):305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v7i2.9267

Jang M, Aavakare M, Nikou S, Kim S. The impact of literacy on intention to use digital technology for learning: A comparative study of Korea and Finland. Telecomm Policy. 2021;45(7):102154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102154

El Islami RA, Nuangchalerm P. Comparative study of scientific literacy: indonesian and thai pre-service science teachers report. Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ. 2020;9(2):261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i2.20355

Munsch A. Millennial and generation Z digital marketing communication and advertising effectiveness: A qualitative exploration. J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. Bridg. Asia World. 2021;31(1):10–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2020.1808812

Pinto M, Fernández-Pascual R, Lopes C, Antunes ML, Sanches T. Perceptions of information literacy competencies among future psychology professionals: a comparative study in Spain and Portugal. Aslib J Inf Manag. 2021;73(3):345–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-04-2020-0103

Chell G, Mikkilä-Erdmann M, Iiskala T, Dillon A. A comparative study of academic literacy in english medium instruction programs in uae and finland. Issues Educ Res. 2021;31(1).

F. Fitriana and A. Rusni, “Menumbuhkan Budaya Literasi Dengan Memanfaatkan Teknologi,” Researchgate.Net, no. July, 2020.

Leite AF, de Bonamino AM. “SCIENTIFIC LITERACY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BRAZIL AND JAPAN,” Cad. Pesqui., vol. 51, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1590/198053147760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/198053147760

Noor MS. Assessing Secondary Students’ Scientific Literacy: A Comparative Study of Suburban Schools in England and Malaysia. Sci. Educ. Int. 2021;32(4):343–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i4.9

Wajdi F. Literacy Culture in the Islamic Religious Education and the Development of Islam in Indonesia. Hayula Indones. J. Multidiscip. Islam. Stud. 2020;4(2):171–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/004.2.02

Khoiri Q, Bustomi B. Literacy Culture of Islamic Education Teachers in Senior High School of Bengkulu City. Din. Ilmu; 2020. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v20i1.2156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v20i1.2156

Downloads

Published

2024-04-04

How to Cite

Salman Farid, A. . (2024). Dynamics of Changes in Literacy Culture in the Social Media Era: Comparative Study of the Millennial Generation and Generation Z. KnE Social Sciences, 9(12), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i12.15885