Download fulltext HTML
Salman Farid, A. (2024). Dynamics of Changes in Literacy Culture in the Social Media Era: Comparative Study of the Millennial Generation and Generation Z. KnE Social Sciences, 9(12), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i12.15885

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i12.15885

statistics

  • 152 Abstract Views
  • 77 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

Published Date

  • Apr 4, 2024

Dynamics of Changes in Literacy Culture in the Social Media Era: Comparative Study of the Millennial Generation and Generation Z

KnE Social Sciences / The First Annual International Conference on Social, Literacy, Art, History, Library, and Information Science (ICOLIS) / Pages 627–643

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dynamics of changes in literacy culture in the social media era with a focus on millennials and generation Z. The presence of social media has changed the way individuals access, process and share information. A comparative study method was used to compare the influence of social media on literacy culture between millennials and generation Z. Data was collected through structured surveys and interviews involving participants from both generations. The variables observed included reading frequency, types of literature consumed, sources of information used, and patterns of sharing information through social media. The results of the study show that there is a significant difference between the millennial generation and generation Z in terms of the influence of social media on literacy culture. Millennials tend to read digital content more often and use social media as the main source of information. Meanwhile, generation Z tends to be more active in sharing information through social media and using special social media platforms to expand their literacy reach.


Keywords: social media, millennial generation, generation Z, literacy culture

References
[1] Rusydiyah EF, Zaini Tamin AR, Rahman MR. Literacy Policy in Southeast Asia: A Comparative Study between Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Cent. Educ. Policy Stud. J. 2023;13(2): https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1214.

[2] R. BR, A. Mundiri, and L. Nuril, “INTERNALIZATION OF RELIGIOUS MODERATION EDUCATION THROUGH CULTURE LITERACY WITH A NATIONAL INSIGHT,” Edureligia J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 07, no. 01, 2023.

[3] Mastur M. Library Management Strategy to Strengthen Literacy Culture in Elementary Schools. J. Basicedu. 2023;7(1):964–74.

[4] Wilson-Lopez A, Minichiello A, Green T, Hartman C, Garlick J. A Comparative Case Study of Engineers’ Literacy Practices and Implications for Transformative Disciplinary Literacy Pedagogies in Engineering Education. Read Res Q. 2022;57(4):1129– 47.

[5] Long Y, Jia C, Luo X, Sun Y, Zuo W, Wu Y, et al. The Impact of Higher Education on Health Literacy: A Comparative Study between Urban and Rural China. Sustainability (Basel). 2022;14(19):12142.

[6] Ross AD, Rouse SM. (Young) Generations as Social Identities: The Role of Latino*Millennial/Generation Z in Shaping Attitudes About Climate Change. Polit Behav. 2022;44(3):1105–24.

[7] Basili C, Sacchanand C, Tammaro AM, Wimolsittichai N. The Role of Policies on Teaching Information Literacy in Higher Education: A Comparative Study in Italy and Thailand. Int Inf Libr Rev. 2022;54(4):354–71.

[8] Hamna H, Ummah BK MK. Science Literacy in Elementary Schools: A Comparative Study of Flipped Learning and Hybrid Learning Models. Dasar. 2022;9(2):132–47.

[9] J. G. Korompis and W. J. F. Tumbuan, “THE INFLUENCE OF BRAND AMBASSADOR AND BRAND IMAGE ON E-COMMERCE PURCHASE DECISION AT TOKOPEDIA MARKETPLACE (STUDY ON MILLENNIAL AND GENERATION Z IN MANADO),” 903 J. EMBA, vol. 10, 2022.

[10] Rovagnati V, Pitt E, Winstone N. Feedback cultures, histories and literacies: international postgraduate students’ experiences. Assess Eval High Educ. 2022;47(3):347– 59.

[11] Shalikhah ND, Argandika YP, Gunawan T, Ichsanto MR, Anjani PP, Octaviani IN. Empowerment of Alam Kalijaga reading house to improve literacy culture of the Nasri Hamlet, Grabag, Magelang. Community Empower. 2022;7(9): https://doi.org/10.31603/ce.7144.

[12] Kurniawan R, Setiyaningsih LA, Sofyan I. Islamic Boarding School Journalism As a Way of Strengthening Literacy Culture. Mediat. J. Komun. 2022;15(1):41–54.

[13] K. Kreslins, M. Rihards Ikse, G. Dreijers, and T. Vasiljeva, “Digital Literacy, Digital Culture and Digitalization in Europe,” J. Internet E-bus. Stud., 2022, https://doi.org/10.5171/2022.193158..

[14] Al Anshori HA, Baharun H, Hamada SE, Hasanah N. DIGITAL LITERACY CULTURE IN MILENIAL STUDENTS AT BOARDING SCHOOLS. EDURELIGIA J. Pendidik. Agama Islam. 2022;6(2):204–14.

[15] Feuerstein M. Review: Digital and Media Literacy: Connecting Culture and Classroom (2011). J Media Lit Educ. 2022;: https://doi.org/10.23860/jmle-4-1-11.

[16] Baharun H, Wahid AH, Qodriyah K, Wahyuni S, Fatmawati F. Building a Literacy Culture Based on Local Wisdom through Women’s Leadership. J. Obs. J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini. 2022;6(4):2533–43.

[17] Marmoah S, Poerwanti Suharno JI. Literacy culture management of elementary school in Indonesia. Heliyon. 2022 Apr;8(4):e09315.

[18] Liagkis MK. The Socio-Pedagogical Dynamics of Religious Knowledge in Religious Education: A Participatory Action-Research in Greek Secondary Schools on Understanding Diversity. Religions (Basel). 2022;13(5):395.

[19] Mahyudin MA. Habib, and Sulvinajayanti, “DINAMIKA PENGARUSUTAMAAN MODERASI BERAGAMA DALAM PERKEMBANGAN MASYARAKAT DIGITAL,”. ASKETIK. 2022;6(1): https://doi.org/10.30762/asketik.v6i1.181.

[20] Wahyuni LD, Ariyani M, Hutomo BA. A Comparative Study: The Demographic Differences of Game Literacy. Res. Dev. J. Educ. 2021;7(2):305.

[21] Jang M, Aavakare M, Nikou S, Kim S. The impact of literacy on intention to use digital technology for learning: A comparative study of Korea and Finland. Telecomm Policy. 2021;45(7):102154.

[22] El Islami RA, Nuangchalerm P. Comparative study of scientific literacy: indonesian and thai pre-service science teachers report. Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ. 2020;9(2):261.

[23] Munsch A. Millennial and generation Z digital marketing communication and advertising effectiveness: A qualitative exploration. J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. Bridg. Asia World. 2021;31(1):10–29.

[24] Pinto M, Fernández-Pascual R, Lopes C, Antunes ML, Sanches T. Perceptions of information literacy competencies among future psychology professionals: a comparative study in Spain and Portugal. Aslib J Inf Manag. 2021;73(3):345–66.

[25] Chell G, Mikkilä-Erdmann M, Iiskala T, Dillon A. A comparative study of academic literacy in english medium instruction programs in uae and finland. Issues Educ Res. 2021;31(1).

[26] F. Fitriana and A. Rusni, “Menumbuhkan Budaya Literasi Dengan Memanfaatkan Teknologi,” Researchgate.Net, no. July, 2020.

[27] Leite AF, de Bonamino AM. “SCIENTIFIC LITERACY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BRAZIL AND JAPAN,” Cad. Pesqui., vol. 51, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1590/198053147760.

[28] Noor MS. Assessing Secondary Students’ Scientific Literacy: A Comparative Study of Suburban Schools in England and Malaysia. Sci. Educ. Int. 2021;32(4):343–52.

[29] Wajdi F. Literacy Culture in the Islamic Religious Education and the Development of Islam in Indonesia. Hayula Indones. J. Multidiscip. Islam. Stud. 2020;4(2):171–88.

[30] Khoiri Q, Bustomi B. Literacy Culture of Islamic Education Teachers in Senior High School of Bengkulu City. Din. Ilmu; 2020. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v20i1.2156.