The Influence of Mineral Nutrition on the Productivity of Spring Rape

Abstract

This article presents data on the influence of mineral nutrition on the productivity of spring bird rape varieties in the conditions of the non-chernozem zone of Russia. The experiments were carried out on agro-gray loamy soils of the experimental agrotechnological station of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Ryazan State Agrotechnological University” (FSBEI HE RSATU) in the Ryazan Region in 2016-2018. A level of mineral nutrition for spring bird rape was calculated asN180P100K100. Based on this, the options for mineral nutrition in research were established. According to the results of the experiments, the duration of the growing season of spring bird rape varieties was established: 73-91 days.An increase in nitrogen to 150 kg of the active substance turned out to be less effective, as the yield increased slightly or remained at the level of N90P50K50. The use of phosphoruspotassium fertilizers did not contribute to the creation of such a nutritional regime that would increase seed productivity. An increase in the nitrogen nutrition of the plants led to increased protein content anddecreased oil content in seeds. This trend was observed in all varieties of spring bird rape. The average oil content was 38.5-45.5% and the average protein contentwas 18.0-24.7%, depending on the variety and the level of mineral nutrition. On average, the highest oil content was shown by varieties Lipchanka (44.1%) and Kulta (42.6%).


Keywords: agro-gray soil, level of mineral nutrition, oil content, productivity, spring bird rape, variety

References
[1] Bogaci, R. and Danilic, D. (1989).Specific Behavior of Zeolite Tuffs in Soil Processes of Cation Exchanges. Bulletin of the Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, vol. 18, pp. 227-235.

[2] Dospekhov, B.A. (2011).Methods of Field Experiment (With The Basics of Statistical Processing of Research Results): A Textbook for Students of Higher Agricultural Educational Institutions in Agronomic Specialtie(6th ed.). Moscow: Alliance.

[3] Fedin, M.A. (1985).Methodology of State Variety Testing of Agricultural Crops. Moscow: USSR Ministry of Agriculture.

[4] Hanes, Y. (1990).VplyvZeolitovychTufitov Na FyzikalneAchemickeVlastnostiRegazemearenicke. Polnohospodarstvo, vol. 5, pp. 39-40.

[5] Ilieva, A. and Vasileva, V. (2013).Effect of Liquid Organic Humate Fertilizer Humustimon Chemical Composition of Spring Forage Pea. Banat’s Journal of Biotechnology,vol. 4, issue 7, pp. 74-79.

[6] Kosolapov, V.M. andTrofimov, I.A.(2011). Scientific Support of Russian Meadow Farming. Feed Production, vol. 8, pp.47-48.

[7] Lupova, Е.I.,Vysotskaya,Е.А. and Vinogradov, D.V. (2020, October).Improvement of Elements of Oil Flax Cultivation Technology on Gray Forest Soil. Presented at 6th International Conference on Agriproducts Processing and Farming, Voronezh, Russian Federation. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing,

[8] Fedin, M. A. Ed. (1983). Methods of State Variety Testing of Agricultural Crops (vol. 3). Moscow: USSR Ministry of Agriculture, p.184.

[9] Muller, S. (2014). Pаrаmeter fur die N-Dungung der Brаugerste in Abhangig-keit vom аnorgаnischen Stickstoff (Nan) im Boden. Getreidewirtschaft, vol. 18, pp. 272-273.

[10] Mustafayev, M.G. (2008). Influence of Soil-Climatic Conditions of the Mugano-SalyanMassif on Agricultural Production. Tbilisi. News of Agrarian Science, vol. 3, pp. 44-47.

[11] Shchur, A.V. andValckho, V.P. (2016). Effect of Different Levels Agroecological Loads on Biochemical Characteristics of Soil. South of Russia: Ecology, Development, vol. 11, issue 4, pp. 139-148.

[12] Shpaar, D.,et al. (2007). Rape and Bird Rape Growing Harvest. Moscow: Аgrodelo, p. 320.

[13] Tanner, L.H., et al. (2015). Soil Carbon Accumulation and СО2Flux in Experimental Restoration Plots, Southern Iceland: Comparing Soil Treatment Strategies. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, vol. 20, pp. 46-58.

[14] The State Register of Breeding Achievements Approved for Use. (2018). Plant Varieties (vol. 1). Moscow:Rosginformagrotekh, pp.504.

[15] Tulu, T. (1990). Estimation of Crop Coefficients for Compilation of PET. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture, vol. 8, pp. 49-53.

[16] Vasileva, V. (2015) Aboveground to Root Biomass Ratios in Pea and Vetch after Treatment with Organic Fertilizer. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management (GJESM), vol. 1, issue 2, pp. 71-74.

[17] Vinogradov, D.V.,et al.(2019, October). Features of Using Modern Multicomponent Liquid Fertilizers in White Mustard Agrocoenosis. Presented at 6th International Conference on Agriproducts Processing and Farming, Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing.

[18] Domínguez, J.A., Kumhálová, J. andNovák, P. (2017). Assessment of the Relationship between Spectral Indices from Satellite Remote Sensing and Winter Oilseed Rape Yield.Agronomy Research, vol. 15, pp. 55-68.

[19] Vasileva, V. andIlieva, A. (2011). Chemical Composition, Nitrate Reductase Activity and Plastid Pigments Content in Lucerne Under the Influence of Ammonium and Nitrate form Mineral Nitrogen.Agronomy Research, vol. 9, pp. 357-364.

[20] Obraztsov, V., Shchedrina. D. and Kadyrov. S. (2018).FestuloliumSeed Production Dependence on Fertilizer Application System.Agronomy Research, vol. 16, pp. 846-853.