Financial Sustainability of Non-profit Organizations in Tourist Destinations - Differences Between Coastal and Continental Destinations
Abstract
The lack of funds needed to carry out activities is often a limiting factor to the development of non-profit organizations (NPOs) and a threat to their survival. To be financially sustainable, NPOs must seek to increase the share of their own earned income while reducing the share of public funding (donations) in their income structure. By operating in developed tourist regions and undertaking activities in tourism, NPOs can take advantage of an array of opportunities to generate their own income. The aim of this paper was to determine whether there are any differences in financial sustainability between NPOs operating in the most developed coastal tourist destinations of Croatia and NPOs operating in the country’s most developed continental tourist destinations. The paper also aimed to identify which NPOs show a higher level of financial sustainability, that is, which NPOs have a higher share of own earned income relative to the share of donations and grants. To this end, an online survey was conducted of NPO Assembly members in the most developed coastal and continental tourist destinations (based on tourist traffic in the past 10 years) in Croatia. The results indicated that there are statistically significant differences between NPOs operating in coastal tourist destinations and NPOs operating in continental tourist destinations with regard to the amount of income generated by active self-funding (selling products and providing services) and the amount of income from other self-funding (income from membership fees and assets).
Keywords: non-profit organizations, financial sustainability, tourism, self-funding
References
[1] Abraham A. Financial sustainability and accountability: A model for nonprofit organisations. Accounting & Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand Annual Conference; 2003 Jul 6-8; Brisbane, Australia.
[2] Alymkulova A, Seipulnik D. NGO strategy for survival in Central Asia: Financial sustainability. Policy brief. The William Davidson Institute. 2005;22(1):1-8.
[3] Bush R. Survival of the nonprofit spirit in a for-profit world. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 1992;21(4):391-410. doi: 10.1177/089976409202100406
[4] Carroll DA, Stater KJ. Revenue diversification in nonprofit organizations: Does it lead to financial stability? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008;19(4):947-966. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mun025
[5] Ceptureanu S, Ceptureanu E, Orzan M, Marin I. Toward a Romanian NPOs sustainability model: Determinants of sustainability. Sustainability. 2017;9(6):966. doi: 10.3390/su9060966
[6] Cornforth C. Nonprofit governance research: Limitations of the focus on boards and suggestions for new directions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2012;41(6):1116-1135. doi: 10.1177/0899764011427959
[7] Dadić L, Ribarić HM. Improving the financial sustainability of nonprofit organizations through tourismrelated activities. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing. 2021;26(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1692
[8] Enjolras B. The commercialization of voluntary sport organizations in Norway. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2002;31(3):352-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764002313003
[9] Francois EJ. Financial sustainability for nonprofit organizations. New York: Springer; 2015.
[10] Gajdová D, Majdúchová H. Financial sustainability criteria and their testing in the conditions of the Slovak non-profit sector. Contemporary Economics. 2018;12(1):33-57.
[11] Gras D, Mendoza-Abarca KI. Risky business? The survival implications of exploiting commercial opportunities by nonprofits. Journal of Business Venturing. 2014;29(3):392 404. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.05.003
[12] Guo B. Charity for profit? Exploring factors associated with the commercialization of human service nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2006;35(1):123 138. doi: 10.1177/0899764005282482
[13] Hodge MM, Piccolo RF. Funding source, board involvement techniques, and financial vulnerability in nonprofit organizations: A test of resource dependence. Nonprofit Management and Leadership. 2005;16(2):171-190. doi: 10.1002/nml.99
[14] Institute for Tourism. Tourism in figures 2019 [Internet]. Institute for Tourism; 2019. Available from: https: //www.htz.hr/sites/default/files/2020-07/HTZ{%}20TUB{%}20HR_{%}202019{%}20{%}281{%}29.pdf
[15] Kerlin J, Pollak T. Nonprofit commercial revenue: A replacement for declining government grants and private contributions? The American Review of Public Administration. 2011;41(1):686-704. doi: 10.1177/0275074010387293
[16] Khieng S, Dahles H. Commercialization in the non-profit sector: The emergence of social enterprise in Cambodia. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. 2015;6(2):218-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676. 2014.954261
[17] Moeller L, Valentinov V. The commercialization of the nonprofit sector: A general systems theory perspective. Systemic Practice and Action Research. 2012;25(4):365-370. doi: 10.1007/s11213-011-9226- 4
[18] Okten C, Weisbrod BA. Determinants of donations in private nonprofit markets. Journal of Public Economics. 2000;75(2):255-272. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00066-3
[19] Omeri KL. Factors influencing financial sustainability of non-governmental organizations: A survey of NGOs in Nakuru County, Kenya. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management. 2015;3(1):704-743.
[20] Ministry of Justice and Public Administration. Register of associations of the Republic of Croatia. 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 15]. Available from: https://registri.uprava.hr/#!udruge
[21] Segal LM, Weisbrod BA. To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector. Weisbrod BA, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. Interdependence of commercial and donative revenues; p. 105-127.
[22] Sontag-Padilla L, Staplefoote BL, Gonzalez Morganti K. Financial sustainability for nonprofit organizations [Internet]. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2012. Available from https://www.rand. org/pubs/research_reports/RR121.html
[23] Vaceková G, Svidroňová M. Benefits and risks of self-financing of NGOs: Empirical evidence from the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Austria. Ekonomika a Management. 2014;17(2):31-40. doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-009