Assessing Willingness to Communicate in the Multilingual Environment
Abstract
The paper describes the results of an empirical study supported by the McCroskey’s Willingness to Communicate Scale and the findings of the self-assessed communication apprehension survey. The research was carried out in the context of the Russian regional university under internationalization. The respondents included two groups of Russian students and one group of foreign students (52 people in total). The answers given by the students enabled assessment of the level of anxiety they could experience in the proposed communication contexts: public speaking; communication in a small group; speech at a meeting; and interpersonal talk. Supposedly, a high level of readiness for communication in a foreign language would indicate the person’s psychological security and lack of discomfort when networking. In addition, the research aimed to find a correlation between the number of foreign languages and the duration of their study, and the individual’s desire to engage in verbal communication with strangers. According to the results of the communication apprehension test, all the students showed an average index of communication anxiety, and this moderate level can complicate their future introduction into a diverse professional community. Also, this study revealed that the number of languages and the willingness to communicate do not correlate. However, the number of years students learn languages is directly linked with their willingness to communicate. It is suggested that the quasi-communicative format of teaching foreign languages in the classrooms contrasts sharply with the emerging dynamic multicultural space of the university.
Keywords: willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, foreign language environment
References
[1] The Ural Federal is us (2019, May). Retrieved May 15, 2019 from https://urfu.ru/ru/about/today/figures.
[2] Chang, Y. and Brickman, P. (2018). When Group Work Doesn’t Work: Insights From Students. CBE Life Sciences Education, vol. 17, issue 3, p. 42. https://www.lifescied.org/doi/full/10.1187/cbe.17-09-0199.
[3] Vemuri, R. B., Ram, M. R. and Kota, S. K. (2013). Attitudinal Barriers for Learning English as Second Language: Problem Analysis. International Journal on English Language and Literature, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 30–35.
[4] Nikulicheva, D. B. (2013). Studying Linguistic and Psychological Strategies of Polyglots for the Purposes of Language Learning. Journal of Psycholinguistics, issue 18, pp. 90-97.
[5] Kang, S. (2005). Dynamic Emergence of Situational Willingness to Communicate in a Second Language. System, vol. 33, issue 2, pp. 277-292.
[6] Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and Speaking English as a Second Language. RELC Journal, vol. 37, issue 3, pp.308-328.
[7] Baghaei, P. D. and Dourakhshan, A. (2012). The Relationship Between Willingness to Communicate and Success In Learning English as a Foreign Language. MJAL, vol. 4, issue 2, pp. 53-67.
[8] Barjasteh, H., Vaseghi, R. and Neissi, S. (2012). Iranian EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate Across Different Context- and Receiver-Types. International Journal of English Linguistics, vol. 2, issue 1, pp. 47-54.
[9] Kruchina, O. N. (2017). Formation of Readiness for Communication in a Foreign Language of Future Navigators. Historical and Social Educational Idea, vol. 9, issue 4, part 1, pp.188-193, doi: 10.17748/2075- 9908-2017-9-4/1-188-193.
[10] Мillrood, R. P. and Мaksimova, I. R. (2017). Communicative competence or communicative readiness of language learners for communication. Language and culture, no. 38, pp. 250-268.
[11] Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use: The Japanese ESL context. Second Language Studies, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 29-70.
[12] McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, no. 40, pp. 20–26.
[13] McCroskey, J. C. (1985). The Content Validity of the PRCA-24 as a Measure of Communication Apprehension across Communication Contexts. Communication Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 165–173.
[14] Oberg, K. (2009). Culture Shock and the problem of Adjustment to the new cultural environments. World Wide Classroom Consortium for International Education & Multicultural studies, 29 Sept.
[15] Rahmatollahi, M. and Khalili, G. F. (2015). Relationship between Intermediate EFL learners’ communication apprehension, willingness to communicate, and speaking ability. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, vol. 4, no. 6, pp.23-32, doi: 10/7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.6p.23
[16] Abramova, I. and Shishmolina, E. (2017). Modeling a foreign language environment when teaching non-linguistic students: preliminary results. Educational studies, no. 3, pp. 132-151, doi: 10.17323/1814- 9545-2017-3-132-151