How We Predict the Stability of Financial Sector: The Conditional Value at Risk Technique Approach
Abstract
This study aims to identify the level of systemic risk of each bank and the financial linkages between banks in Indonesia. In this study, researcher uses 41 banks that have been actively traded on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2013-2018. The data of stock capitalization of banks are used as prices in a portfolio of banking system. The method used in this study is the CVaR (Conditional Value at Risk) method which was introduced by Adrian and Brunerrmeir in 2008. The equilibrium of the system is assumed reached at optimum portfolio of the system. At this situation each bank contribution to systemic risk is analyzed, as well as its impact onto it when there is a change in capitalization of a certain bank. The result shows the impact of bank onto systemic risk is not always follow its size in contribution the systemic risk. Due to covariance’s among banks are some positive and others are negative, some banks have negative contribution to systemic risk while others’ are positive. There are 4 banks that have different behavior. These banks have negative contribution to the systemic risk. These banks are BMRI, PNBN, PNBS and NAGA. The negative impact to systemic risk is dominated by BMRI as much as -0.17%, and by PNBN as much as -0.04%. There are 2 major banks that have contribution to systemic risk; BBCA (3,01% or Rp 59,1 trillion) and BBRI (0,54% Rp 10,62 trillion). However their impact on systemic risk are different. The parameters of impact on systemic for BBCA and BBRI are 14,99% and 52,94% respectively. Thus the stability of the system is more sensitive to the volatility of Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BBRI) than of Bank Central Asia (BBCA).
Keywords: Systemic Risk, Financial Linkage, Value at Risk, Conditional Value at Risk, covariance banking
References
[1] Anagnostis, K. and K. Alexios (2014). ”Factors of Weaknesses of Supervisory Methods as Components of Systematic Risk. The Impacts of Collapses to Instability of Banking System.” Procedia Economics and Finance 9: 120-132.
[2] Angelini, E. C. and F. Farina (2012). ”Current account imbalances and systemic risk within a monetary union.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 83(3): 647-656.
[3] Azmat, S., M. Skully, et al. (2015). ”Can Islamic banking ever become Islamic?” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 34: 253-272.
[4] Bluhm, M. and J. P. Krahnen (2014). ”Systemic risk in an interconnected banking system with endogenous asset markets.” Journal of Financial Stability 13: 75-94.
[5] Capponi, A. and P.-C. Chen (2015). ”Systemic risk mitigation in financial networks.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 58: 152-166.
[6] de Guevara Cortés, R. L. and S. T. Porras (2014). ”Estimation of the underlying structure of systematic risk with the use of principal component analysis and factor analysis.” Contaduría y Administración 59(3): 197-234.
[7] Dong, B. and G. Guo (2011). ”The relationship banking paradox: No pain no gain versus raison d’être.” Economic Modelling 28(5): 2263-2270.
[8] Ellis, L., A. Haldane, et al. (2014). ”Systemic risk, governance and global financial stability.” Journal of Banking & Finance 45: 175-181.
[9] Gaftea, V. (2014). ”Socio-economic Major Risks Related to the Information Technology.” Procedia Economics and Finance 8: 336-345.
[10] Giglio, S., B. Kelly, et al. (2016). ”Systemic risk and the macroeconomy: An empirical evaluation.” Journal of Financial Economics 119(3): 457-471.
[11] Huang, X., H. Zhou, et al. (2009). ”A framework for assessing the systemic risk of major financial institutions.” Journal of Banking & Finance 33(11): 2036-2049.
[12] Li, Y., S. Zhu, et al. (2013). ”Active allocation of systematic risk and control of risk sensitivity in portfolio optimization.” European Journal of Operational Research 228(3): 556-570.
[13] López-Espinosa, G., A. Moreno, et al. (2015). ”Systemic risk and asymmetric responses in the financial industry.” Journal of Banking & Finance 58: 471-485.
[14] Markose, S., S. Giansante, et al. (2012). ”‘Too interconnected to fail’ financial network of US CDS market: Topological fragility and systemic risk.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 83(3): 627-646.
[15] Martínez-Jaramillo, S., O. P. Pérez, et al. (2010). ”Systemic risk, financial contagion and financial fragility.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34(11): 2358-2374.
[16] Masih, M., M. Alzahrani, et al. (2010). ”Systematic risk and time scales: New evidence from an application of wavelet approach to the emerging Gulf stock markets.” International Review of Financial Analysis 19(1): 10-18.
[17] Tomuleasa, I.-I. (2015). ”Macroprudential Policy and Systemic Risk: An Overview.” Procedia Economics and Finance 20: 645-653.
[18] Zakir, N. and W. S. Malik (2013). ”Are the effects of monetary policy on output asymmetric in Pakistan?” Economic Modelling 32: 1-9.