Protests Against Controversial Art As a Political Strategy
Abstract
The article discusses the phenomenon of politically motivated public outrage around art in Russia. The history of protests against art in Russia is relatively short but intense. Since 90’s there occurred a number of attacks on art, the majority of which were protests against art that in some way expressed criticism of current state policy or Russian Orthodox Church. It may seem that in Russia the moral majority decides the fate of controversial artistic events, but as this article argues, that conflicts around art are frequently used by religious fundamentalists and nationalist right-wing groups to pursue their own political agendas and gain popularity in the media.
Keywords: hate spin, contemporary art, public censorship, offense, Russia, religious fundamentalism, SERB, vandalism
References
[1] M. Ryklin, Swastika, cross, star. A work of art in the era of managed democracy, 2006.
[2] J. Greene, J. Haidt, “How Does Moral Judgment Work,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, no. 6 (12), pp. 517–523, 2002.
[3] J. Nado, D. Kelly, S. Stich, Moral Judgment. In J. Symons & P. Calvo (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Psychology. Routledge, 2009.
[4] C. Balme, “The Affective Public Sphere: Romeo Castellucci’s On the Concept of the Face Regarding the Son of God,” Tiyatro Eleştirmenliği ve Dramaturji Bölümü Dergisi Sayi, no. 22, pp. 97–112, 2013. Available at: http://www.journals.istanbul.edu.tr/iutiyatro/article/view/5000190237
[5] W. Mitchell, What Do Pictures Want?: The Lives and Loves of Images, 2005. Available at: https://www. press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/W/bo3534152.html
[6] Criminal code of the Russian Federation (CC RF) of 13.06.1996, No 63-FZ (as last revised) Consultant Plus. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_10699
[7] P. Sloterdijk, Rage and Time: A Psychopolitical Investigation, 2010. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/ stable/10.7312/slot14522
[8] M. Nussbaum, The New Religious Intolerance. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: Harvard University Press, 2012. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jbxf6
[9] S. Žižek, Violence: Six Sideways Reflections. New York: Picador, 2008.
[10] G. Agamben, State of exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
[11] P. DiMaggio, The Role of Religion in Public Conflicts over the Arts in the Philadelphia Area 1965–1997/P. DiMaggio, L. Robinson, B. Steensland, and Wendy Cadge. Avilable at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar. org/5e27/f3eb352611bca5b029486ae0fb7d9815f3d8.pdf
[12] C. George, “Regulating ‘Hate Spin’: The Limits of Law in Managing Religious Incitement and Offense,” International Journal of Communication, no. 10(0), 18. 2016. Available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/ article/view/5451
[13] Forbidden Art, 2015. Available at: https://artprotest.org
[14] I. Mikirtumov, “Rhetoric of the hurt feelings,” RATIO.ru., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 80–101, 2016.
[15] Slonov’s exhibition will work in a crushed form. Visitors will be given respirators. Mira Avenue, 2018. Available at: https://prmira.ru/news/v-moskve-otkryvayut razgromlennuyu-vystavku-slonova- posetitelyam-vydadut-respiratory.
[16] S. Sulim, “Officers of Russia” against the Lumiere Center. Main. Meduza, 2016. Available at: https: //meduza.io/feature/2016/09/25/ofitsery-rossii-protiv-tsentra-lyumier-glavnoe
[17] K.-J. Gomez, “Protest reaction of the audience to the morally provocative art,” News of the Ural Federal University. Social Sciences, vol. 13, no. 3 (179), pp. 124–134, 2018.