The Effect of Window Width and Window-level Settings in Non-enhanced Head CT to Increase the Diagnostic Value of Subacute Ischemic Stroke
Abstract
Background: Non-enhanced head CT (NECT) was known as one of the modalities to assess subacute ischemic stroke. The values of window width (WW) and window level (WL) were influencing lesion conspicuity and diagnostic accuracy as well. The ability of physicians to detect parenchymal hypoattenuation depended on window width and window-level settings. Objective: To determine the best value of head NECT window width and window level in the subacute ischemic stroke. Material and method: Routine non-enhanced CT scanning was performed with the patient’s head in a head holder with a 64 Slice MSCT Light speed (GE Medical Systems) in the hospital emergency department using the following non-helical scanning technique: 120 kV, 625 mA, and 5-mm section thickness. Twenty six values of window width and window level of subacute ischemic stroke were made and assessed by 28 experienced radiologist. We found the best value of 35 WW 25 WL. This value was significantly better than brain window (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In summary, we have demonstrated that the detection of subacute ischemic stroke with non-enhanced head CT scanning was facilitated by window width and window-level settings. The 35 WW 25 WL setting was recommended to increase the diagnostic value of subacute stroke infarct.
Keywords: non-enhanced head CT, subacute ischemic stroke, window width, window level
References
[1] Department Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Laporan Hasil Riset Kesehatan Dasar Indonesia (Riskesdas). (2013)
[2] Osborn AG, Blaser SI, Salzman KL, Provenzale J, et al. (2005) Diagnostic Imaging. 2005 Amirsys: 4–56
[3] Schellinger PD. (2005) The evolving role of advanced mr imaging as a management tool for adult ischemic stroke: A Western–European perspective. Neuroimaging clinics of North America.;15:245–258
[4] Mullins ME.(2006) Modern emergent stroke imaging: pearls, protocols and pitfalls. Radiolo Clin North Am;44:41–62
[5] Foundation for Education and Research in Neurological Emergencies (FERNE). Neuroimaging in Stroke. (2003)
[6] Harrigan MR, Deveikis JP. (2009) Trombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke. In: Handbook of Cerebrovascular Disease and Neurointerventional Techniques. New York: Humana Press,; 326
[7] Hakimelahi R, Gonzales RG. (2009) Neuroimaging of Ischemic Stroke with CT and MRI: Advancing Towards Physiology-based Diagnosis and Therapy. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 29-48
[8] Brix, G., Nagel, H.D., Stamm, G., Veit, R., Lechel, U., Griebel, J, et al. (2003)Radiation Exposure in Multi Slice Versus Single Slice Spiral CT: result of a nationwide survey. Euro Radiology, 13: 1979-1991.
[9] Bontrager, Kenneth L. (2001) Textbook of radiographic positioning and related anatomy, Mosby, Inc, Missourry, USA
[10] P. J. Turner, G. Holdsworth. (2011) CT stroke window setting: an unfortunate misleading misnomer. Br J Radiol; 84(1008): 1061–1066.
[11] Charlie Chia-Tsong Hsu. (2010) Left MCA ischaemic stroke (stroke window setting). Manzoor-Rad Mock CNS.
[12] Lev MH, Farkas J, Gemmete JJ, Hossain ST, Hunter GJ, Koroshetz WJ, Gonzalez RG. (1999) Acute stroke: improved nonenhanced CT detection-benefits of softcopy interpretation by using variable window width and center level settings.Radiology.;213(1):150-5
[13] Seeram E, (2001) Computed Tomography: physical principles, clinical applications, and quality control, Second edition, WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia
[14] Tomandl BF, Klotz E Handschu R Stemper B, Reinhardt F, Huk WJ, Eberhardt KE, Fateh-Moghadam S. (2003) Comprehensive Imaging of Ischemic Stroke with Multisection CT. RadioGraphics; 565 – 592.
[15] Srinivasan A, Goyal M, Al Azri F, Lum C.(2006) State-of-the-art imaging of acute stroke. RadioGraphics;26:S75–S95