Implementation of Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice: A Study of Normative Dilemmas in the Prosecutor's Office
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i28.20141Keywords:
assets, criminal, prosecutor, transparencyAbstract
The Prosecutor’s Office is one of the institutions in the criminal justice system that has an important position in law enforcement in Indonesia. The authority of the prosecutor’s office includes implementing court decisions in the form of returning criminal assets. In this journal, the problem raised is how the procedure for returning criminal assets is carried out at the Gianyar District Prosecutor’s Office, and whether the implementation of returning criminal assets carried out at the Gianyar District Prosecutor’s Office is in accordance with the principle of transparency. The purpose of writing this journal is to find out the procedure for returning criminal assets at the Gianyar District Prosecutor’s Office and to find out the suitability between the implementation of asset return activities at the Gianyar District Prosecutor’s Office and the principle of transparency. The research method used is the empirical legal research method. Based on the results of the study, the return of criminal assets at the Gianyar District Prosecutor’s Office is carried out in two ways, namely being taken by the owner of the goods by showing proof of ownership of the goods or a power of attorney (if the person taking it is not the original owner), or being delivered directly by the Gianyar District Prosecutor’s Office to the owner of the goods. In addition, the activities of returning criminal assets carried out at the Gianyar District Attorney’s Office have been in accordance with the principle of transparency, as indicated by the openness of information on evidence provided by the Gianyar District Attorney’s Office through the official website of the Gianyar District Attorney’s Office and the official social media of the Gianyar District Attorney’s Office.
References
[1] Arifin, Deddey Candra. “Kendala Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Transnasional” Jurnal Badan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Keuangan Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. 2018; Vol. 11, No. 1: 28-55
[2] Fernando ZJ. Pujiyono, Rochaeti, Nur. “Perampasan Aset Pelaku Tindak Pidana dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Prinsip Hukum Pidana”. Jurnal Leglislasi Indonesia. 2022;19(1):83–93.
[3] Hamamah F, Hari BH. Model Pengembalian Aset (Asset Recovery) Sebagai Alternatif Memulihkan Kerugian Negara dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam. 2019;4(2):184–92.
[4] Janaindra, Anak Agung Gede, Widhiyaastuti, & I Gusti Agung Ayu Dike. Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Upaya Asset Recovery Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus di Kejaksaan Tinggi Bali). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Wicara Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana. 2020; 9 (8): 15–27.
[5] Khaira, Emil, Mohd, & Din, Dahlan. Penetapan Barang Bukti dalam Penyelidikan dan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana Universitas Syiah Kuala. 2014; 2 (1): 72–86.
[6] Rinaldi F. Proses Bekerjanya Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Memberikan Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan. Jurnal Hukum Respublica. 2022;21(2):179–88.
[7] Sofwan VS, Sulastri T. Peran Pusat Pemulihan Aset di Kejaksaan Negeri Bandung. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Akurat. 2019;10(3):151–65.
[8] Waskito B. Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Perspektif Integrasi. Jurnal Daulat Hukum. 2018;1(1):287–304.
[9] Dirdjosisworo, Soedjono. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Bandung, Rajawali Pers; 2020.
[10] Sugiharto R. “Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dan Seklias Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Beberapa Negara”. Semarang, Unissula Press; 2012.
[11] Criminal Code
[12] Criminal Procedure Code
[13] Regulation of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia No. 7 of 2020 concerning the Second Amendment to the Regulation of the Attorney General Number PER-027/A/JA/10/2014 concerning Guidelines for Asset Recovery.
[14] Attorney General’s Office Will Revise the Technical Guidelines for Prosecuting Children”, accessed on December 10, 2020; Source: http://www.tribunnews.com/2012/01/20/kejaksaanagung-akan-revisi-juknispenuntutan- anak
[15] Barda Nawawi Arief, Anthology of Criminal Law Policy, Jakarta: PT. Kencana Prenada Media Group; 2008.
[16] Braithwaite, John, Restorative justice and Responsive Regulation, (New York: Oxford University Press; 2002
[17] D.S., Dewi and Fatahilah A. Syukur, Penal Mediation: Implementation of Restorative Justice in Indonesian Children’s Courts, Indie-Publishing, Depok; 2011.
[18] Dikdik M. Arief Mansur & Elisatris Gultom, The Urgency of Protecting Crime Victims Between Norms and Reality, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. 2006;
[19] Mahendra, Adam Prima, “Penal Mediation at the Investigation Stage Based on Restorative Justice”, Jurnal Jurist-Diction, 3(4), 2020; 1153–1178.
[20] Nashriana. Criminal Legal Protection for Children in Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada; 2011.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dewa Gede Natih Dena Darma Putra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
