Mechanism of Goods and Services Procurement Implementation from the Perspective of Legal Certainty in Natuna Police Station
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i28.20140Keywords:
certainty, police, procurement, servicesAbstract
The procurement of government goods and services is an integral part of state financial management, which must be carried out in a transparent, efficient, and accountable manner to support the performance of public services. In the context of law enforcement agencies, such as the National Police, procurement plays an important role in supporting institutional operations, especially in strategic areas such as the Natuna Police in border areas. However, in practice, procurement implementation often faces various administrative, technical, and structural obstacles that have implications for legal certainty. This research aims to analyze the mechanism for implementing the procurement of goods and services at the Natuna Police Station from the perspective of legal certainty, as well as identify inhibiting factors and efforts to strengthen them. This study uses an empirical juridical approach using a qualitative method. The approach used includes a statute approach to analyze applicable regulations, a case approach to procurement practices at the Natuna Police Station, and a conceptual approach to understanding relevant legal principles. Data were obtained through interviews, observations, and the study of documents and regulations related to the implementation of procurement. The theories used as knives for analysis are Sudikno Mertokusumo’s Legal Certainty Theory and Lawrence M. Friedman’s Legal System Theory. The results show that although the Natuna Police has referred to Presidential Regulation No. 16/2018 and internal police regulations, there are still structural constraints, unsynchronized regulatory substances, and a weak culture of legal compliance. Therefore, strengthening the supervisory system, digitizing procurement, and increasing the capacity of human resources are important steps in ensuring legal certainty in the implementation of procurement.
References
[1] Abhinaya DN, Jennifer C. Peran Hukum Administrasi Negara Untuk Mencegah Korupsi Di Indonesia. Gorontalo Law Review. 2023;6(1):149–54.
[2] Ali A. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan ( Judicialprudence). 1st ed. Kencana; 2022.
[3] Faturrahman I, Bawono BT. Application of restorative justice to solution of traffic accidents. Jurnal Daulat Hukum. 2021;4(1):27–32.
[4] Firmansyah VZ, Syam F. Penguatan Hukum Administrasi Negara Pencegah Praktik Korupsi dalam Diri Pemerintahan Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi. 2021;7(2):325–44.
[5] Laksana AW. (2021). Manifestation Of Pancasila Values in the Omnibus Law for Justice. The 1st Proceeding International Conference and Call Paper, 1(1).
[6] Marzuki S. Dimensi” Kejahatan Korporasi” dan Reaksi Sosial. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM. 1994;1(2):9–14.
[7] Parameshwara P, Riza K. Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Konteks Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi (Corruption Crimes in the Context of Corporate Criminal Liability). Jurnal Studi Multidisiplin Ilmu. 2023;1(1):25–34.
[8] Rosyidi I, Amin R. Kedudukan Dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Whistleblower Dalam Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah. Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian Dan Anti Korupsi. 2024;1(1):9–22.
[9] Sofyanoor A. Peran Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Sibatik Journal: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi. Dan Pendidikan. 2022;1(2):21–30.
[10] Suka JB, Bawono BT, Laksana AW. The Implementation of Code of Conduct for Members of Police as Accurators of Murder. Law Development Journal. 2022;4(2):197–204.
[11] Susanto SN. Good Governance Dalam Konteks Hukum Administrasi. Administrative Law and Governance Journal. 2019;2(2):205–17.
[12] Ali A. Menguak Teori Hukum dan Teori Peradilan. 1st ed. Kencana; 2020.
[13] Bastian I. Manajemen Keuangan Publik. Penerbit Andi; 2021.
[14] Hasan S, Elpisah E, Sabtohadi J, Abdullah A, Fachrurazi F. Manajemen keuangan. Penerbit Widina; 2022.
[15] Indrajit RE, Djokopranoto R. Manajemen persediaan. Jakarta: Grasindo; 2003.
[16] Friedman LM. The legal system: A social science perspective. Russel Sage Foundation; 1975.
[17] Mardiasmo MB. Otonomi & manajemen keuangan daerah: edisi terbaru. Penerbit Andi; 2021.
[18] Marzuki PM. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi Cet. Ke-12. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group; 2016.
[19] Marzuki PM, Sh MS. Teori hukum. Prenada Media; 2020.
[20] Mertokusumo S, Pitlo A. Penemuan hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti; 2009.
[21] Soekanto, S., & M. S. (2021). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Rajawali Pers.
[22] The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia;
[23] Law Number 1 of 2004 concerning State Treasury;
[24] Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police;
[25] Presidential Regulation (Perpres) Number 12 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods/Services
[26] Regulation of the Chief of Police Number 3 of 2020 concerning Procurement of Goods and Services
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Darwinsyah, Denny Suwondo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
