Legal Analysis of the Responsibility of Perpetrators of Fraud from the Perspective of Gender Justice (Case Study of Criminal Case Decision Number 651/Pid.B/2024/Pn Jkt Pst)

Authors

  • Dany Agung Pratama Master of Law Program, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (UNISSULA), Semarang https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3621-4870
  • Sri Endah Wahyuningsih Master of Law Program, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (UNISSULA), Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i28.20139

Keywords:

fraud, gender justice, judgment

Abstract

The phenomenon of fraud that occurs massively and regularly in various sectors of life ranging from personal relationships, economic transactions, to digital practices reflects a serious distortion in the value system of society. Therefore, to understand and overcome the phenomenon of fraud crimes comprehensively, an interdisciplinary approach is needed involving legal analysis, sociology, criminology, and social psychology. In addition, the increase in fraud cases also shows weaknesses in the law enforcement system, which is not yet fully effective in carrying out its preventive and repressive functions. The approach method used by the author to compile the assessment uses the Normative Juridical method. The research specifications used in this study are descriptive analysis types. In this study, the author focuses on library research and primary documents in the form of current laws and secondary documents in the form of expert opinions, law books, journals and magazines. The Panel of Judges decided to sentence the defendant to imprisonment for 1 year and 4 months minus the length of time the defendant was detained with an order for the defendant to remain in detention. Although the verdict can be said to be legally correct from a legal-formal perspective, because the elements of Article 378 of the Criminal Code are indeed fulfilled (the existence of trickery, loss to the victim, and the intention to take possession of goods unlawfully), but from the perspective of substantive justice and gender justice, this verdict leaves important questions. In the verdict, there is no description of who the Defendant is in the social context.

References

[1] Susetiyo ZI, Iftitah M. Kepastian Hukum Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Bidang Kesehatan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Jurnal Supremasi. 2022;12(2):27–36.

[2] Ilyas A. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education; 2014.

[3] Hamzah A. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika; 2006.

[4] Huda C. Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan (Cet. 2). Jakarta: Kencana; 2006.

[5] Comack E. Women in Trouble: Connecting Women’s Law Violations to Their Histories of Abuse. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing; 1996.

[6] Perempuan K. Pedoman Pemeriksaan Perkara Berbasis Gender dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta; 2021.

[7] Maria SW. Sumardjono. (n.d.). Hukum dan Gender: Tantangan dalam Pembangunan Hukum di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press; 2009.

[8] Muladi & Barda Nawawi Arief. Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni; 1992.

[9] Mulia SM. Keadilan Gender dalam Perspektif Islam dan Hukum. Jakarta: Gramedia; 2010.

[10] Matalatta N. Victimology: Sebuah Bunga Rampai. Jakarta: Pusat Sinar Harapan; 2001.

[11] Taufiq M. Mahalnya Keadilan Hukum: Belajar dari Kasus Lanjar. Semarang: MT&P Law Firm; 2012.

[12] Taufiq M. Keadilan Substansial Memangkas Rantai Birokrasi Hukum. Semarang: MT&P Law Firm; 2014.

[13] Nurhayati S. Hukum Pidana dan Perempuan: Perspektif Gender dalam Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana; 2020.

[14] Rusianto A. Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group; 2016.

[15] Saleh R. dalam Amrani, H., & Ali, M. Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Perkembangan dan Penerapan. Jakarta: Rajawali Press; 2015.

[16] Sudarto, dalam Amrani, H., & Ali, M. Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Perkembangan dan Penerapan. Jakarta: Rajawali Press; 2015.

[17] Syawal Abdul & Anshar. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Komando Militer pada Pelanggaran Berat HAM (Suatu Kajian dalam Teori Pembaharuan Pidana). Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo; 2010.

[18] Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia; 1945.

[19] Criminal Code.

[20] Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP).

[21] Law Number 1 of concerning the National Criminal Code; 2023.

[22] Court Decision Number. 651/PID.B/2024/PN JKT PST

Downloads

Published

2025-11-03

How to Cite

Pratama, D. A., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2025). Legal Analysis of the Responsibility of Perpetrators of Fraud from the Perspective of Gender Justice (Case Study of Criminal Case Decision Number 651/Pid.B/2024/Pn Jkt Pst). KnE Social Sciences, 10(28), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i28.20139