Fighting Termination of Investigation Using Universal Sweeping Methods PMH Lawsuit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i28.20127Keywords:
act lawsuit, law, investigation, unlawfulAbstract
Police officers must act professionally, carefully, and cautiously when stopping an investigation from a report from the public, by stating that they did not find a criminal act in the report, so as not to harm the law that is just. Legal efforts to fight the act of stopping the investigation when there are indications that it is not carried out professionally, carefully, and cautiously, even if it is felt that there is an interest of the investigator or the investigator’s superior or a certain party who has very strong economic or political power, is not regulated by Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law. This study aims to find a legal breakthrough to fight the termination of the investigation in a case that is indicated as a criminal act. This study was conducted with a legislative and conceptual approach. From analyzing the results of the discussion, it can be seen that a lawsuit for unlawful acts based on Article 1365 of the Civil Code can be used as a court order to ’force’ investigators to continue the investigation process to the investigation stage, so that justice, which is the crown of law enforcement, can be achieved.
References
[1] Aaron, Thomas J. Control of Police Discretion, Charles C. Thomas, Spring-field; 1960.
[2] Arief BN. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana – Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana; 2014.
[3] Brouwer, J.G & Schilder A Survey of Dutch Administrative Law, Nijmegen: Ars Aeguilibri; 1998.
[4] Clark R. The Concept of International Criminal Law and Its Relationship With Transnational Criminal Law and Conflict of Laws. Transnational Criminal Law Review. 2023;1(2):90–118.
[5] Dubrovin VV. Legal regulation of compensation for damage caused by a crime under the legislation of the Federal Republic of Germany. International Criminal Law and International Justice. 2009;(4):31–6.
[6] Harahap Y. Pembahasan Permasalahan & Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan & Penuntutan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika; 2006.
[7] Hiariej EO. Prinsip - Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta; 2016.
[8] Kuba S. Optimalisasi Perlindungan Saksi & Korban Dalam Rangka Memantapkan Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah. 2022;22(1):89–100.
[9] Kusuma IM, Sepud IM, Karma NM. Upaya Hukum Praperadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum. 2020;1(2):73–7.
[10] Makarao, Mohammad Taufik & Suhasril. Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Teori & Praktek, Cetakan ke-2, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia; 2010.
[11] Mansar A, Lubis I. Harmonization of Indonesian Criminal Law Through the New Criminal Code Towards Humane Law. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development. 2023;11(12):110–9.
[12] Marpaung L. Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana (penyelidikan & penyidikan). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika; 2009.
[13] Muabezi ZA. Negara Berdasarkan Hukum (Rechtsstaats) Bukan Kekuasaan (Machtsstaat). Jurnal Hukum & Peradilan. 2017;6(3):421–46.
[14] Muladi & Diah Sulistyani. Kompleksitas Perkembangan Tindak Pidana & Kebijakan Kriminal. Bandung: Alumni; 2016.
[15] Munib MA. Tinjauan Yuridis Kewenangan Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Dalam Penyelidikan & Penyidikan Menurut Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Justitiable-Jurnal Hukum. 2018;1(1):60–73.
[16] Nguyen VT. Compensation for damage caused by a crime in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the Russian Federation. Jurnal Cita Hukum. 2021;9(2):211–20.
[17] Pedoman Pelaksanaan Undang-undang Republik Indonesia tentang Kitab Undangundang Hukum Acara Pidana, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1981 Nomor 76 (KUHAP), Keputusan Menteri Kehakiman RI No. M.01.PW.07.03 Tahun 1982, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita
[18] Prawoko, Adtila., Ab’& Syukur, Neni Susilowati, Muhammad Ihsan Musyaffa, Fitri Aulia Hannan Nisa. Proses Penyelidikan, Penyidikan & Wewenangnya dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Jurnal ilmiah Multidisiplin; 2024. 1 (4). 205-216.
[19] Rahardjo S. Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing; 2009.
[20] Sadjijono. Hukum Kepolisian, Prespektif Kedudukan & Hubungan dalam Hukum Administrasi.Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo; 2006.
[21] Samosir D. Segenggam Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia; 2013.
[22] Sampara, Said e.t al . Metode Penelitian Hukum. Makassar: Kretakupa Makassar; 2017.
[23] Sayuti. “Konsep Rechtsstaat Dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia (Kajian Terhadap Pendapat Azhari).” Jurnal Nalar Fiqh Volume 4. Nomor. 2011;2(December):88–120.
[24] Simorangkir CT, Rudy T. Erwin, SH., JT. Prasetyo, SH., Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika; 2002.
[25] Sitous, Jeifson and achmad Sulcan. Policy Termination of Alleged Crime Investigation in Polres Semarang. Jurnal Daulat Hukum; 2019. 2 (4). 637-644
[26] Soedarto. Hukum & Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumi; 2000.
[27] Surayin. Tanya Jawab Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002, Yrama Widya Bandung: Yrama Widya; 2004.
[28] Suryono Sutarto., Hukum Acara Pidana Jilid I. Semaranga: Universitas Diponegoro; 2004.
[29] Vilani, Diah Resti., Niken Kurnia Yunita, Ahmat Luqman Nanda & david Aldo Wijaya. Mekanisme Penyelidikan, Penyidikan, & Mengadili Di Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru. Jurnal riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, politik, & Humaniora; 2023.2 92). 107-122.
[30] Wahyu, Valentino Aquila De, Aurelia Eka Junita, Amanda Destiana,Krisna Agus Setyabudi, Farrah Nidau Daini, & FX. Hastowo Broto Laksio. Analisis kinerja Penyelidikan & penyidikan dalam Menaggulangi Tindak Pidana kriminal di polres Karanganyar. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan & Sosial Humaniora; 2024.1 92). 50-62.
[31] Criminal Procedure Law. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of. KUHAP; 1981.
[32] Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2002 Number 2, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4168).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dwi Wahyono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
