Legal Analysis of the Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in a Justice-based Judicial System

Denny Suwondo

doi:10.18502/kss.v10i28.20123

Authors

Denny Suwondo Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (UNISSULA), Semarang https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7122-6682

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i28.20123

Keywords:

analysis, artificial, intelligence, justice, legal

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a “machine” that is able to do different things that are considered to require human intelligence to be done, such as recognizing human language, a person’s face, driving, or, in the case of advanced AI, even using production machines in companies. The type of research used in this study is qualitative research using a normative legal approach. Qualitative research is one that aims to find out and explore various events experienced directly by research subjects to then be described using various scientific methods. The legal system faces an increasing amount of data, including laws, court decisions, evidence, and criminal records. AI can analyze big data quickly and efficiently and identify patterns, trends, and relevant information in legal cases. In addition, AI can automate routine tasks such as drafting legal documents, searching for precedents, and analyzing contracts. A significant challenge is the possibility of leakage or misuse of personal data in the digital justice system. Sensitive data such as health information, personal identities, and legal records may be attractive targets for cybercriminals, so prioritizing data protection in the design and implementation of a digital justice framework is essential. Ensuring data encryption is also important to keep information secure.

References

[1] Amboro, F. Y. P., & Komarhana, K. Prospek Kecerdasan Buatan Sebagai Subjek Hukum Perdata di Indonesia, Law Review; 2021. 21 (2)

[2] Anggita S, Sembiring TB. Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Tantangan Dan Prospek di Era Digital. Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research. 2024;2(1):256–71.

[3] Article 1 Number 5 of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information.

[4] Article 3 Paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning Electronic Systems and Transactions.

[5] Bilaleya, A. A. URGENSI LIE DETECTOR DALAM SISTEM PEMBUKTIAN PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA. LEX PRIVATUM, (2024): 14(3)

[6] Cahya I. “Upaya Apple ‘perang’ Kecerdasan Buatan Lewat Siri,” 2018, https://www.merdeka.com/teknologi/upaya-apple-perang-kecerdasan-buatan-lewatsiri. html

[7] Clarina R, Monica DR, Maulani DG. Strategi Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Narkotika oleh Anak di Era Digital. Journal of Contemporary Law Studies. 2024;1(4):276–86.

[8] Du G, Yu M. Big data, AI, dan sistem peradilan di Tiongkok: berikut ini yang sedang terjadi. Pengamat sistem peradilan Tiongkok. 2019. https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/big-data-ai-and-chinas-justice-heres-whatshappening

[9] Eka NA. M Sihombing and Muhammad Yusrizal Adi Syaputra, “Implementasi Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah,”. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum. 2020;14(3):419–34.

[10] Esther Salmerón-Manzano, “Legaltech and Lawtech: Global Perspectives, Challenges, and Opportunities,”. Laws. 2021;10(2).

[11] Febri Jaya and Wilton Goh. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Kedudukan Kecerdasan Buatan Atau Artificial Intelligence Sebagai Subjek Hukum Pada Hukum Positif Indonesia,” Supremasi Hukum 17, No. 2 (2021): 1-11, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33592/jsh.v17i2.1287

[12] Fersini E, Messina E, Archetti F, Cislaghi M. Semantik dan pembelajaran mesin: generasi baru sistem manajemen pengadilan. Sains Inf Komputasi Komunitas. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29764-9_26.

[13] Hah H, Goldin DS. How Clinicians Perceive Artificial IntelligenceAssisted Technologies in Diagnostic Decision Making: Mixed Methods Approach. Journal Of Medical Internet Research, 23 (12); 2021. hlm. 1–20. Https://Doi.Org/10.2196/33540

[14] Husna L, Rizki SN. Pemanfaatan JST Pengenalan Keaslian Pola Tanda Tangan untuk Pencegahan Tindakan Pemalsuan Tanda Tangan. Jurnal Teknik Informatika UNIKA Santo Thomas; 2023. pp. 116–24.

[15] Huwae VJ, Hehanussa DJ, Taufik I. Pendekatan Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik di Bidang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. PATTIMURA Law Study Review. 2023;1(1):124–36.

[16] Ibnu Sina Chandranegara. “Bentuk-bentuk Perampingan dan Harmonisasi Regulasi”, Jurnal Ius Quia Iustum Vol. 26 No. 3 (2019)

[17] Iqbal M, Ardie HJ, Hasan Z. Analisis Hukum Dalam Melacak Jejak Digital Dan Memahami Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Era Teknologi. Iqtishaduna. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah; 2024. pp. 286–98.

[18] Joenaidi Efendi & Johnny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif Dan Empiris). Jakarta: Prenada Media; 2018.

[19] Lin, T. C. Artificial intelligence, finance, and the law. Fordham L. Rev; 2019. 88.

[20] Lisfer Berutu, “Mewujudkan Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Dengan e-Court,” Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum 5, no. 1 (2020)

[21] Moleong LJ. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya; 2006.

[22] Muhammad Tan Abdul Rahman Haris. Tantimin. Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence di Indonesia, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum; 2022. 8 (1).

[23] Nining Rahayu, “Mengenal Revolusi Industri Dari 1.0 Hingga 4.0,” 2019, https://www.wartaekonomi.co.id/read226785/mengenal-revolusi-industri-dari-10- hingga-40#:∼:text=Revolusi ndustry merupakan fenomena yang, ekonomi%2C dan budaya di dunia.

[24] Paulus Wisnu Yudoprakoso. “Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) Sebagai Alat Bantu Proses Penyusunan Undang-Undang Dalam Upaya Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0 Di Indonesia,” Simposium Hukum Indonesia 1, No. 1 (2019)

[25] Sitorus, S. Pendapat Hukum (Legal Opinion) dan Uji Kepatutan Dari Segi Hukum (Legal Due Diligence). Hikmah; 2020. 15(2).

[26] Solution L. “Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) & Tantangan Ya Bagi Hukum Indonesia,” 2021, https://ap-lawsolution.com/id/actio/kecerdasan-buatan-artificialintelligence- tantangann-ya-bagi-hukumindonesia/#:∼:text=Secar eksplisit%2C walaupun dapat melakukan,dapat didefinisikan sebagai subyek hukum.

[27] Sunggono, Bambang. Metodologi penelitian hukum. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada; 2016.

[28] Thomson Reuters. Put Legal Forms and Contracts on the Fast Track. Thomsonreuters. Com;2017. accessed from https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/solutions/fast-track-drafting.

[29] TwoBirds Client Solution. Contract Risk Assessment. TwoBirds.Com, accessed from; 2017. https://www.twobirds.com/en/client-solutions/assessment/contract-riskassessment

[30] Wang N. “Black Box Justice”: hakim robot dan proses penghakiman berbasis AI dalam sistem pengadilan Tiongkok. Simposium Internasional tentang Teknologi dan Masyarakat. Prosiding; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462216.

[31] Yudoprakoso, Paulus Wisnu. “SIMPOSIUM HUKUM INDONESIA.” KECERDASAN BUATAN (Artificial Intelligence) SEBAGAI ALAT BANTU PROSES PENYUSUNAN UNDANG-UNDANG DALAM UPAYA MENGHADAPI REVOLUSI INDUSTRI 4.0 DI INDONESIA, vol. 1 Nomor 1, 2019,

Legal Analysis of the Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in a Justice-based Judicial System

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Information