Effectiveness of the Law in Supervision of Goods and Services in the Body of the Police
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i28.20121Keywords:
effectiveness, goods and services, national police, procurementAbstract
Procurement in the body of goods and services of the National Police is currently carried out electronically since the enactment of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions has been given broad legal space. E-procurement as an information system is a synergy between data, data processing machines (which usually include computers, application programs, and networks), and humans to produce information. This study uses a normative legal approach method with analytical descriptive research specifications. Secondary data comes from primary legal materials, secondary law, and tertiary law, as well as legal expert sources. Data collection through a mixed method between field data and literature. Data processing is carried out qualitatively, then conclusions are drawn using the inductive method. Research problems are analyzed using the theory of legal protection, theory of legal systems, and theory of legal certainty. The results of this study indicate that the effectiveness of the law on procurement of goods and services in the National Police in terms of the effectiveness of its legislation by referring to the organizational perspective on government procurement of goods and services and the role of supervisory institutions in government procurement of goods and services. The data collection was carried out by literature study with legal materials, namely laws and regulations. Data obtained from the literature study were qualitatively analyzed from an empirical perspective. The results of the study show that the law governing the procurement of goods and services has not provided sufficiently strict sanctions, leading to violations still occurring. But with the existence of e-procurement, procurement of goods and services has become more transparent.
References
[1] Hermawan. Business Opportunities in the Procurement of Goods/Services Sector. Media Indonesia, Tuesday, February 23, 2010 Edition.
[2] Nuryanto HD. The Importance of Audit and Standardization of E-Procurement. Pikiran Rakyat Daily. Thursday, March 5, 2009.
[3] Ali, Achmad., Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudance) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudance). Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2009.
[4] Erlinus Thahar, Polmas, Mewujdukan Sinergitas Polisi dan Masyarakat. 2008,
[5] Ishaq. Dasar-dasar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika; 2009.
[6] Kadarmanta MK. PT. Jakarta: Forum Media Utama; 2007.
[7] Kamaroesid, Herry dkk. Pembuat Komitmen, Wewenang dan Tanggungjawabnya dalam Pelaksanaan APBN/APBD. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media; 2010.
[8] Kemitraan dan LPSE Nasional. E-Procurement di Indonesia: Pengembangan Layanan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah Secara Elektronik, 2008.
[9] Lili Rasjidi dan I.B Wysa Putra, Hukum Sebagai Suatu Sistem, Bandung; Remaja Rusdakarya, 1993
[10] Lubis, Andi Fahmi dkk. Hukum Persaingan Usaha Antara Teks dan Konteks. Jakarta: GTZ; 2009.
[11] Solly Lubis M. Filsafat Ilmu Penelitian. Bandung: Mandar Maju; 2008.
[12] Makarim E. Tanggung Jawab Penyelenggara Terhadap Tata Kelolayang Baik Dalam Penyelenggaraan Sistem Elektronik (Good Electronic Governence). Depok: Ringkasan Disertasi FHUI; 2009.
[13] Minarno, Nur Basuki. Makalah: Penegakan Hukum Terkait Penyimpangan dalam Penyelenggaraan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa, explained on Seminar Nasional Hukum Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga Surabaya. 7 November 2009.
[14] Mubaryanto dkk. Metode Penelitian Praktis. Yogyakarta: BP FE UGM; 1987.
[15] Marzuki PM. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana; 2008.
[16] Hadjon PM. Perlindungan Hukum. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka; 1998.
[17] Rahardjo S. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti; 2000.
[18] Simamora YS. Disertasi: Prinsip Hukum Kontrak Dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa oleh Pemerintah. Surabaya Universitas Air Langga Soerjono Soekanto,Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: UI Press 2018 Soetrisno” Proposal Harbinson, Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian ‘’ Jakarta 1998
[19] Mamudji S. Penelitian Hukum Normatif suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: CV Rajawali; 1985.
[20] Suherman AM. Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa (Government Procurement) Prespektif Kompetisi, Kebijakan Ekonomi, dan Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada, 2010.
[21] Sunggono B. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada; 1996.
[22] Sutedi A. Aspek Hukum Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa dan Berbagai Permasalahannya. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika; 2010.
[23] Tindak Pemerintahan. Disampaikan pada Lokakarya Hukum Administrasi dan Korupsi, Departeman HTN FH Unair Surabaya, 28-30 October 2008.
[24] Tjandra R. Hukum Keuangan Negara. Jakarta: PT Gramedia; 2006.
[25] Poerwardaminata WJ. Buku Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka; 2006.
[26] Witanto. Dimensi Kerugian Negara dalam Hubungan Kontraktual (Suatu Tinjauan Terhadap Risiko Kontrak Dalam Proyek Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Instansi Pemerintah). Bandung: CV Mandar Maju; 2012.
[27] Zein, Ahmad Yahya. Kontrak Elektronik & Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis E-Commerce dalam Transaksi Nasional dan Internasional. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju, 2009.
[28] Law Number 1 of 2004 concerning State Treasury. State Gazette Number 5 of 2004.
[29] Law Number 15 of 2004 concerning Audit of Management and Responsibility
[30] Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption. State Gazette Number 3874 of 1999.Republic of Indonesia.
[31] Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption. State Gazette Number 4150 of 2001
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 John Evan William, Genhart Panjaitan, Andri Winjaya Laksana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.