From Digital Exclusion to Adaptive Inclusion: Policy Innovations to Bridge Social Divides in Next-generation Regional Planning in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19599Keywords:
digital transformation, social equity, regional development, e-government, policy innovationAbstract
This study examines the impact of Indonesia’s digital transformation policies on regional social equity, with a focus on disparities between the Western and Eastern regions. Utilizing a comparative methodology with quantitative and qualitative data from government assessments, including the electronic-based government system (SPBE) and Indonesia Digital Society Index (IMDI) from 2022 to 2024, the research identifies spatial, institutional, and policy disparities. The analysis revealed persistent regional digital divides, with Western Indonesia consistently outperforming Eastern Indonesia in both digital readiness and citizen capacity. A positive correlation between IMDI and SPBE scores indicates that societal digital readiness and e-government maturity evolve in tandem. However, these advancements have not equally benefited all regions. The observed digital gaps reflect deeper structural inequalities, necessitating policy innovation for inclusive development. The findings underscore the importance of adaptive, context-specific interventions that align community empowerment with bureaucratic modernization. This study recommends asymmetric, capacity-building programs, performance-based digital equity grants, and the establishment of Regional Digital Transformation Zones (RDTZs) to bridge the digital equity gap and promote inclusive digital transformation in Indonesia.
References
[1] Farmer JL. State Interventions and Interlocal Collaborations Across the Three Pillars of Sustainability. State Local Gov Rev. 2022 Jun;54(2):120–45.
[2] Bayaga A. Examining the predictive relevance of security, privacy risk factors, and institutional logics for e-government service adoption. Electron J Inf Syst Dev Ctries. 2022 Jan;88(1):e12201.
[3] Yu Y, Ren F, Ju Y, Zhang J, Liu X. Exploring the Role of Digital Transformation and Breakthrough Innovation in Enhanced Performance of Energy Enterprises: Fresh Evidence for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability (Basel). 2024 Jan;16(2):650.
[4] Imperiale AJ, Vanclay F. Re-designing Social Impact Assessment to enhance community resilience for Disaster Risk Reduction, Climate Action and Sustainable Development. Sustain Dev (Bradford). 2024 Apr;32(2):1571–87.
[5] Lukmine D, Mizaras S, Gulbinas A, Kajanus M. Testing the Prospective Rapid Impact Assessment Approach for Stakeholders Engagement in Municipality Action Planning: The Case of Tauragė. Sustainability (Basel). 2025 Mar;17(6):2684.
[6] Mullenbach LE, Mowen AJ, Baker BL, Wilhelm Stanis SA. Can urban parks bridge deep divides? Assessing the effects of inter-racial social interaction in parks and public spaces on trust. J Leis Res. 2022 May;53(3):450–72.
[7] Hewidy H, Eräranta S. Bridging the gap: exploring urban resilience and sustainability in Finnish regional development. Sustain Dev (Bradford). 2025 Feb;33(1):794–810.
[8] Humphrey NM, Portillo S, Michaud K. Managing Social Equity: Insights from Local Public Managers. State Local Gov Rev. 2024 Dec;56(4):393–402.
[9] Reames TG, Wright NS. The Three E’s Revisited: How Do Community-Based Organizations Define Sustainable Communities and Their Role in Pursuit of? Sustainability (Basel). 2021 Aug;13(16):8825.
[10] Caset F, Teixeira FM. Visualizing the potential for transit-oriented development: insights from an open and interactive planning support tool in Flanders, Belgium. Environ Plan B Urban Anal City Sci. 2022 Feb;49(2):411–26.
[11] Deslatte A, Kim S, Hawkins CV, Stokan E. Keeping policy commitments: an organizational capability approach to local green housing equity. Rev Policy Res. 2024 Jan;41(1):135–59.
[12] Androniceanu A, Georgescu I. Public Administration Digitalization and Government Effectiveness in EU Countries. Cent. Eur. Public Adm. Rev. 2023 May;21(1):7–30.
[13] Borowski E, Cedillo VL, Stathopoulos A. Dueling emergencies: flood evacuation ridesharing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Jun;10:100352.
[14] Tambunan CA. Tanggung Jawab Corporate Terhadap Lingkungan Hidup Menuju Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. 2022;1(70):101–8.
[15] Akimov A, Kadysheva K. E-government as a tool for communication with young people: legal aspects. J. Law Sustain. Dev. 2023 Mar;11(1):e0272.
[16] Tegethoff T, Santa R, Daú G, Cortes J. Online security in e-government as an antecedent of cost-effectiveness and quality in business operations. Inf Comput Secur. 2023 May;31(2):125–44.
[17] Palos-Sánchez PR, Baena-Luna P, García-Ordaz M, Martínez-López FJ. Digital Transformation and Local Government Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Assessment of Its Impact on the Sustainable Development Goals. SAGE Open. 2023 Apr;13(2):21582440231167343.
[18] Romeike BF. Peer creation and sharing of mnemonics in collaborative documents for pathology education: a pilot study. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul;24(1):742.
[19] Park S. The Construction of Social Inequity and the Role of Public Bureaucracies. J. Policy Stud. 2022 Dec;37(4):1–15.
[20] Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006 Jan;3(2):77–101.
[21] Clark LP, Tabory S, Tong K, Servadio JL, Kappler K, Xu CK, et al. A data framework for assessing social inequality and equity in multi-sector social, ecological, infrastructural urban systems: focus on fine-spatial scales. J Ind Ecol. 2022 Feb;26(1):145–63.
[22] fajar ardiansyah Suprihatiningsih, “Peran Komunitas Mawar Merah Dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Limbah Rumah Tangga Di Kelurahan Tugurejo Kecamatan Tugu Kota Semarang,” vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2022.
[23] Sigurjonsson TO, Jónsson E, Gudmundsdottir S. Sustainability of Digital Initiatives in Public Services in Digital Transformation of Local Government: insights and Implications. Sustainability (Basel). 2024 Dec;16(24):10827.
[24] Rode A. Access to social rights under tension: the growing role of third-party actors in dealing with the administrative burden and its implications. Int J Soc Welf. 2024 Oct;33(4):819–31.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sinta Ningrum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
