Health System Governance Performance in Improving Clean and Healthy Living Behaviors in Southwest Papua Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19598Keywords:
clean and healthy living behavior (PHBS), health system governance, public health promotion, Southwest Papua, governance performance evaluationAbstract
Clean and healthy living behavior (PHBS) is an effort to increase awareness and education in the community about clean and healthy lifestyles. It is expected that with the implementation of PHBS, the community’s quality of life can improve, avoid various diseases, and create a healthy environment. This study aims to measure the performance of health system governance in efforts to improve PHBS in Southwest Papua Province. A qualitative approach is the method used in this research. Data collection methods include observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. Data sources consisted of primary and secondary data, while data analysis was conducted using interactive methods. The research informants included all parties who play a role in the promotive and preventive activities of living and clean behavior in Southwest Papua Province. The Health System Governance Performance in Southwest Papua Province shows that improving PHBS still faces various problems and challenges. In terms of responsiveness, local governments have established health counseling and socialization programs, but have not fully reached remote areas. Program effectiveness is still limited due to low community participation and a lack of trained health workers. In terms of efficiency, budget allocations are often not targeted and lack transparency. Accountability is still weak, marked by the lack of open performance reporting and program evaluation.
References
[1] Compston H. Policy Networks and Policy Change Putting Policy Network Theory to the Test, vol. 53, no. 9. 2009.
[2] Di Gregorio M, Fatorelli L, Paavola J, Locatelli B, Pramova E, Nurrochmat DR, et al. Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks. Glob Environ Change. 2019;54:64–77.
[3] Rudnick J, Niles M, Lubell M, Cramer L. A comparative analysis of governance and leadership in agricultural development policy networks. World Dev. 2019;117:112–26.
[4] Dolmans SA, van Galen WP, Walrave B, den Ouden E, Valkenburg R, Romme AG. A Dynamic Perspective on Collaborative Innovation for Smart City Development: the role of uncertainty, governance, and institutional logics. Organ Stud. 2023;44(10):1577–601.
[5] Molina-Marín G, Ramírez-Gómez A, Oquendo-Lozano T. [Inter-sectorial and interinstitutional cooperation and coordination in Public Health within the market model of the colombian Health Care System, 2012-2016]. Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2018;20(3):286–92.
[6] Heatly MC, Nichols-Hadeed C, Stiles AA, Alpert-Gillis L. Implementation of a School Mental Health Learning Collaborative Model to Support Cross-Sector Collaboration. School Ment Health. 2023 Apr;15(2):1–18.
[7] Q. Mahmood and C. Muntaner, “State-society nexus in Brazil and Venezuela and its effect on participatory governance efforts in health and other sectors,” 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01278-1.
[8] Huttin CC. Policies for life sciences and healthcare in the global health framework. Technol Health Care. 2023;31(4):1497–504.
[9] Tanwar T, Kumar UD, Mustafee N. Optimal package pricing in healthcare services. J Oper Res Soc. 2020;71(11):1860–72.
[10] Williams MJ. Beyond state capacity: bureaucratic performance, policy implementation and reform. J Inst Econ. 2021;17(2):339–57.
[11] Sheikh K, Sriram V, Rouffy B, Lane B, Soucat A, Bigdeli M. Governance roles and capacities of ministries of health: A multidimensional framework. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Mar;10(5):237–43.
[12] Chen Y, Zhang L, Wei M. How Does Smart Healthcare Service Affect Resident Health in the Digital Age? Empirical Evidence From 105 Cities of China. Front Public Health. 2022 Jan;9:833687.
[13] R. Skea, Leadership, organizational change and sensemaking. 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022503.
[14] Hitt WD. The learning organization: some reflections on organizational renewal. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 1995;16(8):17–25.
[15] Campos PA, Reich MR. Political Analysis for Health Policy Implementation. Health Syst Reform. 2019;5(3):224–35.
[16] W. Septiono, “Equity challenges in Indonesian health care,” 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00110-9.
[17] Spencer L, Tanner A, Lu K. Using Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Address Health of the Homeless in Hawaii. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct;11(21):2828.
[18] Weber C, Haugh H, Göbel M, Leonardy H. Pathways to Lasting Cross-Sector Social Collaboration: A Configurational Study. J Bus Ethics. 2022;177(3):613–39.
[19] Dieleman JL, Campbell M, Chapin A, Eldrenkamp E, Fan VY, Haakenstad A, et al.; Global Burden of Disease Health Financing Collaborator Network. Future and potential spending on health 2015-40: development assistance for health, and government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending in 184 countries. Lancet. 2017 May;389(10083):2005–30.
[20] Bergeron K, Abdi S, DeCorby K, Mensah G, Rempel B, Manson H. Theories, models and frameworks used in capacity building interventions relevant to public health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2017 Nov;17(1):914.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eltje Salomina, Hasniati, Muh. Akmal Ibrahim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.