Systemic Capacity Building at the Class IIB Nunukan Correctional Institution in the Implementation of the Prisoner Development Program

Authors

  • Puang Dirham Doctoral of Public Administrative, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South Sulawesi
  • Muh. Akmal Ibrahim Doctoral of Public Administrative, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South Sulawesi
  • ‎ Hasniati Doctoral of Public Administrative, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South Sulawesi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19597

Keywords:

systemic capacity building, development program, prisoners

Abstract

Correctional institutions have a series of obligations to foster prisoners so that they can blend in and become part of society again after their detention period is over. It is hoped that the guidance carried out by the correctional institution can have a positive impact in terms of personality and the independence of prisoners. However, in its implementation, some crucial obstacles still occur, especially in coaching at the Nunukan Class IIB Correctional Institution. Therefore, researchers in this study tried to explore further the problems that occur in the implementation of inmate coaching in the Nunukan class IIB prison, especially from the aspect of systemic capacity building. Systemic capacity building sees a hierarchy in the fulfillment of capacity building components, where the most important components are those that are not physically visible. Systemic capacity building includes tools, skills, staff and infrastructure, structures, systems, and roles. The data were then compiled in qualitative research. Data collection methods include observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. Data sources consisted of primary and secondary data, while data analysis was carried out using interactive methods. The results of this study indicate that there are still many aspects that need to be addressed by the Nunukan Regency Class IIB Correctional Institution, starting from the short duration of the implementation of coaching and coaching programs that are not varied and not sustainable, lack of coaching personnel, cooperation with stakeholders that are still limited and the absence of special regional regulations that are the basis for maximum cooperation in coaching prisoners.

References

[1] Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2018

[2] Journal of Law and Social Dynamics VOL.9 NO.2 April 2012 (Page 137)

[3] Law Number 22 of 2022 Article 39 Paragraph (1)

[4] H. Hamja. (2015). Community Based Correction Model for Prisoners in the Criminal Justice System

[5] Ilato R. Capacity Building of Local Government Towards Good Governance. Gorontalo: Ideas Publishing; 2017.

[6] Grindle, M. S. (l997). Getting Good Government: Capacity Building in the Public Sector of Developing Countries. Boston: Harvard Institute for International Development

[7] Potter C, Brough R. Systemic capacity building: a hierarchy of needs. Health Policy Plan. 2004 Sep;19(5):336–45.

[8] Morrison T. Actionable learning: A handbook for capacity building through casebased learning. Asian Development Bank Institute; 2001.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-02

How to Cite

Dirham, P., Ibrahim, M. A., & Hasniati, ‎. (2025). Systemic Capacity Building at the Class IIB Nunukan Correctional Institution in the Implementation of the Prisoner Development Program. KnE Social Sciences, 10(18), 1699–1711. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19597