Normative Mechanisms in the Papua Special Autonomy Policy Implementation Network
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19589Keywords:
public trust, implementation, Papua Special AutonomyAbstract
Papua Special Autonomy (Otsus) is a policy with strategic value in the context of improving services, accelerating development, and empowering all people in Papua. In the policy implementation network, normative mechanisms are needed as a basis for the policy network. This study aims to analyze the normative mechanism in implementing the Otsus policy. Qualitative research methods were used in this study. Data collection methods include observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. Data sources consisted of primary and secondary data, while data analysis was conducted using interactive methods. The informants in this research are stakeholders who are directly involved in the implementation of the Otsus policy. The results of research on the implementation of Otsus policy show that normative mechanisms play an important role in shaping the behavior of actors in the policy network. In addition to normative rules such as regulations and standard operating procedures, cultural values and Papuan customary norms are also a reference in the implementation of affirmation programs. The implementation network is formed through collaboration between the local government, the Papuan People’s Assembly (MRP), and the community. However, there is often a conflict between customary norms and values and the formal government bureaucracy.
References
[1] Lyu W, Singh N. A model of embedded autonomy and asymmetric information. J Int Dev. 2023;35(8):2429–45.
[2] Baldwin K, Holzinger K. Traditional Political Institutions and Democracy: Reassessing Their Compatibility and Accountability. Comp Polit Stud. 2019;52(12):1747–74.
[3] Ricard LM, Klijn EH, Lewis JM, Ysa T. Assessing public leadership styles for innovation: a comparison of Copenhagen, Rotterdam and Barcelona. Public Manage Rev. 2017;19(2):134–56.
[4] Towalu H. Implementation of Public Policy. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management. 2022;2(1): https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v2i1.246.
[5] Roy J, Levy DR, Senathirajah Y. Defining Telehealth for Research. Implementation, and Equity; 2022. https://doi.org/10.2196/35037.
[6] R. Armstrong and A. Sales, “Welcome to Implementation Science Communications,” 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00018-4.
[7] Song M. “Under the Implementation of Double Reduction Policy,” in Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Education, Language and Art (ICELA 2021), 2022. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220131.146.
[8] Basu D, Mitra S, Purohit A. Measuring Partial Democracies: rules and their Implementation. Soc Indic Res. 2023;166(1):133–55.
[9] Muhawarman A, Ayuningtyas D. D. Administrasi dan Kebijakan Kesehatan, F. Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia, B. Administrasi Kebijakan Kesehatan, and F. Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Sriwijaya, “Communication Policy Formulation for the Implementation of Health Programs,” Jurnal Mkmi, vol. Volume 13, no. 2, 2017.
[10] Selvi S, Kango U. Implementation of Public Service Agency for Good University Governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Education. 2020;3(3):73–84.
[11] Agus Dwiyanto. “Teori Administrasi Publik dan Penerapannya di Indonesia,” Gadjah Mada University Press, vol. 53, no. 978-602-386-875–9, 2020.
[12] D. Knoke, F. U. Pappi, J. Broadbent, and Y. Tsujinaka, Comparing Policy Networks. 1996. . https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174497.
[13] Blair R. Policy Tools Theory and Implementation Networks: Understanding State Enterprise Zone Partnerships. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2002;12(2):161–90.
[14] Alcalde Heras H, Estensoro M, Larrea M. Organizational ambidexterity in policy networks. Compet Rev. 2020;30(2):219–42.
[15] H. Compston, Policy Networks and Policy Change Putting Policy Network Theory to the Test, vol. 53, no. 9. 2009.
[16] Butkus M, Rakauskiene OG, Bartuseviciene I, Stasiukynas A, Volodzkiene L, Dargenyte-Kacileviciene L. Measuring quality perception of public services: customer-oriented approach. Engineering Management in Production and Services. 2023;15(2):96–116.
[17] Pertiwi PK, Wibowo P. Government Reporting and Quality of Public Services: Are They Twins? Journal of Accounting and Investment. 2022;24(1):1–24.
[18] Ishak D. Public Services to Achieve Good Governance in Indonesia. Jurnal Abdimas Peradaban. 2022;3(1):18–25.
[19] Arias-Yurisch K, Retamal-Soto K, Ramos-Fuenzalida C, Espinosa-Rada A. Participation in multiple policy venues in governance of Chile’s Santiago Metropolitan Region: when institutional attributes can make the difference. Policy Stud J. 2024;52(3):583– 602.
[20] Mitchell G, McCambridge J. The ‘snowball effect’: short and long-term consequences of early career alcohol industry research funding. Addict Res Theory. 2021 Jul;30(2):119–25.
[21] Piccoli A, Vittori F, Uleri F. Unmaking capitalism through community empowerment: findings from Italian agricultural experiences. J Rural Stud. 2023;101:103064.
[22] Kadfak A, Antonova A. Sustainable Networks: modes of governance in the EU’s external fisheries policy relations under the IUU Regulation in Thailand and the SFPA with Senegal. Mar Policy. 2021;132:104656.
[23] W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. 2019. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226185941.001.0001.
[24] Codagnone C, Misuraca G, Savoldelli A, Lupia nez-Villanueva F. Institutional isomorphism, policy networks, and the analytical depreciation of measurement indicators: the case of the EU e-government benchmarking. Telecomm Policy. 2015;39(3–4):305–19.
[25] Suranto S, Darumurti A. Local Wisdom-Based Policy Innovation in Indonesia During 2018-2021. Journal of Governance and Public Policy. 2024;11(1):60–70.
[26] Idrus SH, Akib H, Rifdan A. Local Wisdom-Based Tourism: Towards Sustainable Tourism in Kendari, Indonesia, the Capital of Southeast Sulawesi. International Journal on Recent Trends in Business and Tourism. 2023;07(02):38–50.
[27] Arniti NK, Yuliani I, Irawan B, Hidayat H, Zahidah A. “Public Administration from a Local Wisdom Perspective,” ijd-demos, vol. 4, no. 4, 2022, https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v4i4.382.
[28] Yustiani Posumah R, Prasetyanti R, Andewi Gati R. Through Local Wisdom: A Policy Road for Bali’s Post Pandemic Economic Recovery. KnE Social Sciences; 2023. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i11.13578.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yakob Kareh, Sukri, Muh Akmal Ibrahim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
