Interactive Governance and Actor Diversity in Religious Conflict Prevention: A Case Study of Makassar City, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19585Keywords:
diversity, governance, religious harmony, stakeholder engagement, resource mobilizationAbstract
This study examines the diversity dimension of interactive governance in religious conflict prevention in Makassar City, Indonesia, which experiences 70.2% of all conflicts in South Sulawesi. The research analyzes four critical variables: actors and interest groups, values and interests, levels of engagement, and resources in governance systems. Through qualitative methodology involving interviews with key stakeholders from law enforcement, religious institutions, and government agencies, this study identifies how actor diversity influences governance effectiveness. Findings reveal a complex ecosystem where the Forum for Religious Harmony (FKUB) functions as the primary institution facilitating dialogue, complemented by government agencies, religious organizations, law enforcement, and grassroots initiatives. The integration of local wisdom principles, such as “Makassar Sikatutui” with formal governance mechanisms provides cultural foundations for religious harmony. The governance system demonstrates multi-layered engagement extending from city-level institutions to neighborhood communities, with decision-making bodies balancing proportional representation with inclusive participation. While innovative programs have mobilized significant human resources with 1340 “Agents for Strengthening Community Harmony,” financial resources remain limited despite government’s allocation of 500 million rupiah for harmony programs. The research demonstrates that effective governance of religious diversity depends on accommodating diverse actors and interests, integrating cultural values with formal mechanisms, establishing multilevel engagement structures, and mobilizing varied resource types. This contributes to understanding how diversity management within governance systems can enhance religious conflict prevention in complex urban environments.
References
[1] Shu Y, Ma Y, Li W, Hu G, Wang X, Zhang Q. Unraveling the dynamics of social governance innovation: A synergistic approach employing NLP and network analysis. Expert Syst Appl. 2024;255:124632.
[2] Allen C, Malekpour S, Mintrom M. Cross-scale, cross-level and multi-actor governance of transformations toward the sustainable development goals: A review of common challenges and solutions. Sustain Dev (Bradford). 2023;31(3):1250–67.
[3] Papadopoulos Y. From Public to Transnational Administration: A System-Level Perspective on Accountability Beyond State Borders1. Public Perform Manag Rev. 2025;:1–31.
[4] Hansen-Magnusson H, Gehrke C. Re-thinking global governance as fuzzy: multiscalar boundaries of responsibility in the Arctic. Glob Soc. 2025;39(2):203–25.
[5] Pabbajah M. From the indigeneous to the religious practices: islamic construction of the local tradition in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin. 2021;22(1):91–102.
[6] Wekke I, Alam A, Syamsuddin A, Dawabsheh M, Mahamud T. (2024). Negotiating Power: The Political Landscape of Muhammadiyah in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Asian Political Science Review, 8(2), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.14456/apsr.2024.12.
[7] Central Bureau of Statistics. (2024). Population by Religion in Makassar City. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/statictable/2024/03/15/2321/populationby- religion-in-makassar-city-2024.html
[8] National Police Headquarters. (2021). Investigation report: Suicide bombing incident at Makassar Cathedral. Criminal Investigation Department Special Report Series, 2021-ST-038. Retrieved from https://polri.go.id/reports/terrorism/2021/cathedralmakassar
[9] Afandi I. Pelatihan Implementasi Konsep Common Ingroup Identity Model Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Konflik Antar Warga Di Kelurahan Cambayya Kecamatan Ujung Tanah Kota Makassar. Jurnal ABDI: Media Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. 2024;10(1):41–6.
[10] Center for Conflict and Peace Studies. (2023). Institutional analysis of conflict prevention mechanisms in urban Indonesia: The case of Makassar. Hasanuddin University Press. Retrieved from https://cpcs.unhas.ac.id/publications/conflictprevention- makassar-2023
[11] Makki M, Akash SA. Poverty, regional inequality, and the role of governance: tracing geographies of violent extremism in Pakistan. GeoJournal. 2023;88(3):2635–50.
[12] Kooiman J, van Vliet M, Jentoft S, editors. Creative governance: Opportunities for fisheries in Europe. Ashgate; 2003.
[13] Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2008;18(4):543–71.
[14] Ayres S. A decentred assessment of the impact of ‘informal governance’on democratic legitimacy. Public Policy Adm. 2022;37(1):22–45.
[15] Lansing AE, Romero NJ, Siantz E, Silva V, Center K, Casteel D, et al. Building trust: leadership reflections on community empowerment and engagement in a large urban initiative. BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun;23(1):1252.
[16] Rölfer L, Celliers L, Abson D. Resilience and coastal governance: knowledge and navigation between stability and transformation. Ecol Soc. 2022;27(2):art40.
[17] Marah TS, Pradhan HD, Shuhood FA. Youth participation in global governance: opportunities and challenges: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Governance and Public Administration. 2024;2(1):238–49.
[18] Ledi KK, Ameza-Xemalordzo EB, Mensah HK. Unpacking synergistic dynamics between corporate governance and CSR–the role of stakeholder salience. Bus Process Manag J. 2024; https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-01-2024-0003.
[19] Ahmad S, Qamar AJ, Bhatti MA, Bashir U. Integrating Islamic Ethics with Modern Governance: A Comprehensive Framework for Accountability Across Religious, Social, and Economic Dimensions. Al-Irfan. 2023;8(15):51–79.
[20] Che F, Zhou Y, Liu Y. Social quality, knowledge hiding, and community capacity: a study on multi-ethnic communities in Chinese cities. J Bus Res. 2022;144:1024–38.
[21] Suitner J, Haider W, Krisch A. Socially innovative experiments for transformative local development: putting more-than-growth-oriented local interventions in spatial context. Reg Sci Policy Pract. 2024;16(9):100035.
[22] Marín-González F, Moganadas SR, Paredes-Chacín AJ, Yeo SF, Subramaniam S. Sustainable local development: consolidated framework for cross-sectoral cooperation via a systematic approach. Sustainability (Basel). 2022;14(11):6601.
[23] Morgan DR. Structural arrangements in local government: Organizing for effective management. Handbook of local government administration. Routledge; 2019. pp. 129–57., https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315093239/ handbook-local-government-administration?refId=f8d53851-1416-42f4-89b3- fb98d9cd42ae&context=ubx
[24] Haesevoets T, Roets A, Steyvers K, Verschuere B, Wauters B. Towards a multifaceted measure of perceived legitimacy of participatory governance. Governance (Oxford). 2024;37(3):711–28.
[25] Mohammed, A. A. (2024). Re-Imagining Transformative Strategies to End Minority Marginalization in Ethiopia. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 1(aop), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-bja10193.
[26] Boswell J, Dean R, Smith G. Integrating citizen deliberation into climate governance: lessons on robust design from six climate assemblies. Public Adm. 2023;101(1):182– 200.
[27] Ezzatian S, AminZade B. Co-design challenges: exploring collaborative rationality and design thinking in the urban design process. CoDesign. 2024;20(4):763–80.
[28] Seetharam Sridhar, K., Gadgil, R., Dhingra, C., Seetharam Sridhar, K., Gadgil, R., & Dhingra, C. (2020). Good governance in the transparency, accountability, public participation and capacity (TAP-C) framework. Paving the Way for Better Governance in Urban Transport: the Transport Governance Initiative, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9620-5_1.
[29] Kårtvedt LE. Explaining coordination quality in public service delivery. Public Perform Manag Rev. 2024;47(4):849–72.
[30] Osborne SP. The new public governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge; 2010. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861684.
[31] Denton A. Voices for environmental action? Analyzing narrative in environmental governance networks in the Pacific Islands. Glob Environ Change. 2017;43:62–71.
[32] Benford RD, Hunt SA. (2024). Interactional Dynamics in Public Problems Marketplaces: M ovements and the Counterframing and Reframing of Public Problems. In Challenges and choices (pp. 153-186). Routledge.
[33] Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2015). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308. (Original work published 2016)
[34] Wang L, Wang X, Liu X. Project governance and governance of interorganizational project networks: toward understanding their relationships and future research agenda. Proj Manage J. 2025;56(1):31–40.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ansyar, Sukri, Suparman Abdullah, Muh. Akmal Ibrahim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
