Pentahelix Collaboration Management in Natural Disaster Mitigation in West Sulawesi Province

Authors

  • ‎ Fadlan Department of Public Administration, Hasanuddin University
  • Muhammad Akmal Ibrahim Department of Public Administration, Hasanuddin University
  • Muhammad Yunus Department of Public Administration, Hasanuddin University
  • Gita Susanti Department of Public Administration, Hasanuddin University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19525

Keywords:

management, collaboration, pentahelix, disaster, West Sulawesi Province

Abstract

Prevention and management of natural disasters cannot be done by one party alone, it requires the participation of all parties. Indonesian society needs to work together to collaborate with each other. This concept is called pentahelix or multi-stakeholder collaboration. Pentahelix combines government, community, media, academia, and business as an effort to address problems and develop programs by involving crosssectors to share roles. To achieve this goal, policies and frameworks are needed that involve all parties in building a disaster-safe culture in West Sulawesi Province.

The purpose of this research is to examine existing collaboration in disaster mitigation management in West Sulawesi Province by considering how elements of the disaster Pentahelix are involved. The pentahelix collaboration theory, according to Schottle, Haghsheno, and Gehbauer, divides several factors that influence collaboration into communication, commitment, and information exchange. This research used a descriptive qualitative approach and collected data through interviews, observations, and document reviews.

The researcher conducted direct interviews with 10 people who were considered to be able to provide information about the implementation of pentahelix collaboration. The informants in this study represent each element of pentahelix, namely government, business, academia, community, and media.

References

[1] Astris S. Pengantar Sosiologi Dan Perubahan Sosial. Bandung: Bina Cipta; 2006.

[2] Ansell C, Gash A. 2008, Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. 2007 Sep;18(4):543–71.

[3] Cheng, Antony, et all, 2015, Examining the adaptability of collaborative governance associated with publicly managed ecosystems over time: insights from the Front Range Roundtable, Colorado, USA, Resilience Alliance, Ecology and Society 20(1): 35 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss1/art35/

[4] Richie, Lauren, et. All, 2012, Social process in grizzly bear management: lessons for collaborative governance and natural resource policy, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

[5] McDougall Cynthia L., et. All, 2012 Engaging women and the poor: adaptive collaborative governance of community forests in Nepal, Springer Science Business Media Dordrecht.

[6] Kooiman J. 1993. Social Political Governance Introduction, dalam Jan Kooiman, ed, Modern Governance: New Government-Sosiety Interaction, SAGE Publication, London

[7] Huxham C, Siv V. 2006, Achieving collaborative advantage: understanding the challenge and making it happen, Q Emerald Group Publishing Limited, VOL. 22 NO. 2 2006, pp. 3-5, ISSN 0258-0543

[8] Weber EP, et al. Collaboration Enforcement and Endangered Species; A Framework for Assesing Collaborative Problem Solving Capacity. Journal Society and Natural Resources; 2005.

[9] O’Brien M. Review of Collaborative Governance: factors crucial to the internal workings of the collaborative process. Published by the Ministry for the Environment, Publication Number. CR (East Lansing Mich). 2012;:135.

[10] Booher DE. Collaborative governance practices and democracy. Natl Civ Rev. 2004;93(4):32–46.

[11] Alam A, Hoque MM. Local level collaborative governance for pandemic responses: unpacking a case in Bangladesh. Policy & Governance Review. 2022;6(3):207–28.

[12] Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the Literature. Public Adm Rev. 2006;66(Special Issue):44–55.

[13] Choi T. 2014, Revisiting the Relevance of Collaborative Governance to Korean Public Administration, The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, Vol. 29, No. 2 (2014), pp. 21-41. © 2014 by the GSPA, Seoul National University.

[14] Robertson PJ, Choi T. Ecological governance: organizing principles for an emerging era. Public Adm Rev. 2010;70 s1:s89–99.

[15] Budi HH S; HH. Komunikasi bencana: aspek sistem (koordinasi, informasi dan kerjasama). Jurnal Aspikom. 2012;1(4):362–72.

[16] Bingham LB, O’Leary R. Big Ideas in collaborative management. New York: Sharpe; 2008.

[17] Miles MB, Huberman AM, Salda na J. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Sage Publications; 2014.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-02

How to Cite

Fadlan, ‎, Ibrahim, M. A., Yunus, M., & Susanti, G. (2025). Pentahelix Collaboration Management in Natural Disaster Mitigation in West Sulawesi Province. KnE Social Sciences, 10(18), 1075–1092. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19525