Process of Organizational Governance Maturity Model of Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus in Realizing Good Government in Sorong City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19522Keywords:
proses, organizational governance maturity model, good governanceAbstract
The organizational governance maturity model is used to measure the extent to which organizational governance is effectively implemented. This approach is important to be adapted in public sector organizations without exception to the Government Internal Audit Apparatus (APIP) organization, which has the main function of supervision to realize good governance. This research aims to explain the process of organizational governance maturity of the Government Internal Audit Apparatus in realizing good governance in Sorong City. This research uses a qualitative approach. Data collection methods include observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. Data sources consist of primary and secondary data, while data analysis is carried out by stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The informants in this study were the Government Internal Audit Apparatus. The results of this study indicate that Sorong City APIP carries out the risk management process by identifying, analyzing, and responding to potential risks based on Sorong Mayor Regulation Number 8 concerning Risk management guidelines. In internal control, policies, audits, and SOPs are applied to prevent and detect irregularities. Code of ethics, such as integrity, objectivity, and professionalism, are implemented to maintain ethical standards. Vertical and horizontal communication is utilized in apparatus performance evaluation. Cooperation is established both internally between APIP units and externally with auditors, legislators, and executives. Constraints such as limited human resources and coordination are challenges, but the support of commitment and regulations strengthens synergy. In reporting, APIP seeks to convey governance and risk information in an integrative manner to stakeholders through periodic reports and strategic communication forums.
References
[1] Prasojo E, Rudita L. “Civil State Apparatuslaw : Building The Professionalism Of Civil State Apparatus,” Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen PNS, vol. 8, 2014.
[2] Agus Dwiyanto. “Teori Administrasi Publik dan Penerapannya di Indonesia,” Gadjah Mada University Press, vol. 53, no. 978-602-386-875–9, 2020.
[3] Dianti Y. Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;6(11):951–2.
[4] Bhattacharjee A, Sarkar A. Abusive supervision: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly. 2024;74(1):1–34.
[5] Setiadi Y, Hidayanto AN, Rachmawati F, Yohannes AY. “Data Quality Management Maturity Model : A Case Study in Higher Education’s Human Resource Department,” in 7th International Conference on Computing, Engineering and Design, ICCED 2021, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCED53389.2021.9664881.
[6] Prasodjo T. Knowledge Management: Sustainable Human Resource Development in Public Sector Organizations. Jurnal Ad’ministrare. 2020;6(2):159.
[7] Sumanti R. Upaya Peningkatan Kapabilitas Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP) di Aceh Melalui Internal Audit Capability Model (IACM). Jurnal Borneo Administrator. 2020;16(2):137–58.
[8] Guarino V, Bonazzi M, Nimis P, Guitarrari Azzone R, Cariddi B, Zanetti A. Stabilization and evolution of the Brazilian subcontinental lithospheric mantle: insights from garnet xenocrysts and peridotite xenoliths of Três Ranchos kimberlite (APIP, Brazil). Gondwana Res. 2024;130:18–35.
[9] N. Wilkinson and K. Plant, “A framework for the development of an organisational governance maturity model: a tool for internal auditors,” Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research, vol. 13, 2012.
[10] Aristovnik A, Ravšelj D, Murko E. Decoding the Digital Landscape: An Empirically Validated Model for Assessing Digitalisation across Public Administration Levels. Adm Sci. 2024;14(3):41.
[11] Marquez-Tejon J, Jimenez-Partearroyo M, Benito-Osorio D. Integrated security management model: a proposal applied to organisational resilience. Secur J. 2023 Jun;37(2):1–24.
[12] El Khatib M, Yaish A, Alblooshi S. Role of Organization Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3) in leveraging Program and Project Management Practices [IJTOP]. International Journal of Theory of Organization and Practice. 2024;3(2):210–31.
[13] Dudy AA, Ashady S. “Peran Apip Dalam Penegakan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terhadap Hasil Audit Penyalahgunaan Wewenang,” JISIP :Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, vol. 7, no. 2 Nomor 2, 2023.
[14] Dutta A, Roy R, Seetharaman P. An assimilation maturity model for IT governance and auditing. Inf Manage. 2022;59(1):103569.
[15] Steuperaert D, Huygh T, de Haes S, Poels G. “Exploring the dimensions and attributes of a maturity model for IT governance organizational structures,” in Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2021. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2021.730.
[16] Winkler M, Wegner D, Macagnan CB. The Maturity of Strategic Networks’ Governance: Proposal of an Analysis Model. Adm Sci. 2023;13(5):134.
[17] Ndagire L, Maiga G, Oyo B. IT Governance Maturity for Uganda’s Higher Institutions of Learning. Int J Innov Digit Econ. 2022;13(1):1–13.
[18] D. Koryzis, D. Margaris, C. Vassilakis, K. Kotis, and D. Spiliotopoulos, “Disruptive Technologies for Parliaments: A Literature Review,” 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15020066.
[19] Wiedenhöft GC, Luciano EM. “Going the Extra Mile: Impact of Individuals’ Behavior on Information Technology Governance,” Revista de Administracao Contemporanea, vol. 25, no. 5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2021190237.en.
[20] Purna ZA, Didin D. Birokrasi dalam Ekosistem Politik. Masihkah Birokrasi Menjadi Artikulator Pilihan Publik? Jurnal Arajang. 2022;5(1):76–98.
[21] Moreira CS, de Araújo JG, da Silva GR, Lucena WG. “Environmental, social and governance and the firm life cycle: evidence from the Brazilian market,” in Revista Contabilidade e Financas, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20231729.en.
[22] Assefa S. Data Management Strategy for AI Deployment in Ethiopian Healthcare System. Commun Comput Inf Sci. 2023;1800:50–66.
[23] Menukin O, Mandungu C, Shahgholian A, Mehandjiev N. Guiding the integration of analytics in business operations through a maturity framework. Ann Oper Res. 2023; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05614-w.
[24] D. Novita Sari, N. Rhezza Pratama, and R. Nurcahyo, “Digital Transformation Capability Maturity Framework for Digital Audit Readiness in Public Sector (Case Study),” 2023. . https://doi.org/10.46254/AF04.20230109.
[25] A. A. Kompiang, O. Sudana, N. Kadek, A. Wirdiani, I. Bagus, and A. Paramartha, “Evaluation of IT Governance at Office X using the COBIT 5 Framework I Putu Gede Agus Krissna Bayu Eka Pamana PN a1,” Jurnal Ilmiah Merpati, vol. 9, no. 1, 2021.
[26] Indriany HS, Hidayanto AN, Wantania LJ, Santoso B, Putri WU, Pinuri W. “Data Quality Management Maturity: Case Study National Narcotics Board,” in 10th IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite, Comnetsat 2021 - Proceedings, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMNETSAT53002.2021.9530824.
[27] Borchard R, Zeiss R, Recker J. Digitalization of waste management: insights from German private and public waste management firms. Waste Manag Res. 2022 Jun;40(6):775–92.
[28] Groschopf W, Dobrovnik M, Herneth C. Smart Contracts for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Conceptual Frameworks for Supply Chain Maturity Evaluation and Smart Contract Sustainability Assessment. Frontiers in Blockchain. 2021;4:506436.
[29] Petani FJ, Zaoui I, Kovalev S, Montagnon P. What will (and should) sustainable digital maturity look like in business ecosystems? A Delphi study on the best practices, barriers and regulation of digital transformation. Int J Entrep Small Bus. 2023;49(1):87–122.
[30] 30 P. W. Kaandorp, “An integrated readiness and maturity model for Industry 4.0 (I4RMM),” Pure.Tue.Nl, vol. 0, 2021.
[31] Uhrenholt JN, Kristensen JH, Rincón MC, Adamsen S, Jensen SF, Waehrens BV. Maturity Model as a Driver for Circular Economy Transformation. Sustainability (Basel). 2022;14(12):7483.
[32] Cambraia Itaborahy AL, Mathias Machado RP, de Resende Alvares LM. “Knowledge management maturity model: a diachronic perspective,” EM QUESTAO, vol. 27, no. 3, 2021.
[33] El Khatib M, Al Nasser T, Al Awadi M. Program Governance Maturity Models [IJTOP]. International Journal of Theory of Organization and Practice. 2024;3(2):177–96.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ruddy Rudolph Laku, Muhammad Yunus, Thahir Haning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
