Collaborative Governance in Accelerating Regional Financial Access in South Sulawesi Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19508Keywords:
collaborative governance, TPAKD, regional finance, Sulawesi SelatanAbstract
Collaboration has emerged as a strategic approach in addressing the public issues by engaging multiple stakeholders, beyond relying solely on governmental institutions. The concept of collaborative governance—particularly through the Ansell and Gash model—offers a framework to assess how actors contribute to shared governance processes through their respective roles. This study examines the strategies and roles of key stakeholders within Tim Percepatan Akses Keuangan Daerah Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan (TPAKD) of South Sulawesi Province. It explores the potential application of collaborative governance in both the formulation and implementation of policies aimed at expanding regional financial access. The key actors analyzed include the Provincial Government of South Sulawesi, the Financial Services Authority (OJK) of South Sulawesi and West Sulawesi, Bank Indonesia’s South Sulawesi Representative Office, the Regional Office of the Directorate General of Treasury (Ministry of Finance), Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS) Region III – Sulawesi, Maluku, Papua, and the banking industry. This research adopts a qualitative methodology involving field observation, document analysis, and in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, aiming to uncover their respective roles and levels of participation within the TPAKD framework. The findings suggest that the collaborative model implemented by the TPAKD in South Sulawesi has been effectively operationalized. Each actor has contributed in alignment with their institutional mandates, thereby facilitating inclusive financial access for the people of South Sulawesi Province.
References
[1] Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2008;18(4):543–71.
[2] Weber EP, Khademian AM. Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Adm Rev. 2008;68(2):334– 49.
[3] Provan KG, Milward HB. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating publicsector organizational networks. Public Adm Rev. 2001;61(4):414–23.
[4] Koontz TM, Thomas CW. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Adm Rev. 2006;66(6):111–21.
[5] Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature. Public Adm Rev. 2006;66 s1:44–55.
[6] Imperial MT. Using collaboration as a governance strategy: lessons from six watershed management programs. Adm Soc. 2005;37(3):281–320.
[7] Gray B, Purdy JM. Collaborating for our future: Multistakeholder partnerships for solving complex problems. Oxford University Press; 2018., https: //global.oup.com/academic/product/collaborating-for-our-future-9780198782841 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198782841.001.0001.
[8] Feiock RC. The institutional collective action framework. Policy Stud J. 2013;41(3):397–425.
[9] Romzek BS, LeRoux K, Blackmar JM. A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors. Public Adm Rev. 2012;72(3):442–53.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fuad Zaen, Muh. Akmal Ibrahim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
