Forms and Historical and Cultural Roles of Traditional Governance (Ondoafi/ondofolo) in the Governance of Indigenous Communities in Jayapura Regency, Papua Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19474Keywords:
traditional governance, Ondoafi/Ondofolo, village governance, special autonomy, capacity of customary institutions, PapuaAbstract
This study aims to analyze the forms and historical and cultural roles of the traditional governance of Ondoafi/Ondofolo in the governance of indigenous communities in Jayapura Regency, Papua. The traditional governance in this area holds a significant position within the social structure of the community and plays a strategic role in preserving cultural values, mediating conflicts, and regulating land and natural resource rights. The existence of Ondoafi/Ondofolo is culturally and spiritually legitimate. However, it has not been fully integrated functionally into the village governance system established by the state, especially after the implementation of Papua’s special autonomy. This study employs a qualitative approach with a case study method in several villages in Jayapura Regency. Data were collected using document studies. The research findings indicate that the traditional governance of Ondoafi/Ondofolo is characterized by genealogical and collective leadership, with roles encompassing spiritual, social, and ecological aspects. However, there is an imbalance in the relationship between traditional governance and formal governance, often leading to overlapping authority and disharmony in village development implementation. The study reveals that co-optation occurs when the government takes over customary roles without involving traditional leaders, rendering traditions merely symbolic. Hybridization occurs when customary and modern systems integrate, such as in customary deliberations involving village apparatus. Marginalization arises when customary roles are sidelined by formal policies. Institutional transformation is dynamic, encompassing co-optation, hybridization, and marginalization, reflecting the contextual interaction between customary and formal governance within village administration. Strengthening the role of Ondoafi in Jayapura Regency is carried out through accommodative policies based on local wisdom, such as the regional regulation on the recognition of traditional governance. Role optimization is achieved through the village customary council (DAK), village development planning discussions (Musrenbang) based on customary dialogue, and governance training for traditional leaders to enhance capacity and effective participation.
References
[1] Ayomi DS. Analisis kebijakan integrasi kepemimpinan Ondoafi dalam sistem struktur dan mekanisme Pemerintahan Provinsi Papua: Studi kasus Distrik Sentani Kabupaten Jayapura. Tesis Magister, Universitas Indonesia; 2008.
[2] Brown MA. Hybrid Governance and Democratisation—Village Governance in Timor- Leste. Link; 2012.
[3] Logan C. Chieftaincy, Diaspora, and Development: The Institution of Nkosuohene in Ghana. Link; 2009.
[4] Boege V, Brown MA, Clements KP. Hybrid Political Orders, Not Fragile States. Link; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402650802689997.
[5] Allen M, Dinnen S, Evans D, Monson R. Justice Delivered Locally: Systems. Challenges and Innovations in Solomon Islands; 2013.
[6] Englebert P. State Legitimacy and Development in Africa. Link; 2002.
[7] Wazni, & Zulfa Harirah MS. Relasi Kuasa Negara dan Adat dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata Budaya Melayu di Kabupaten Siak, Riau. Jurnal PolGov, Universitas Gadjah Mada. 2023..
[8] Satria O, Lestari RP. Collaborative Governance dalam Pemerintahan Desa Tanjung Pauh Mudik. Kabupaten Kerinci ( Jambi): Jurnal Tanah Pilih, Universitas Islam Negeri Jambi; 2023.
[9] Mansoben F. Sistem Politik Tradisional di Irian Jaya. Jakarta: LIPI Press; 1995.
[10] Boelens RA, Hoogendam P, editors. Water Rights and Empowerment. Van Gorcum; 2002.
[11] Soepomo. Pengantar dalam Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita; 1984.
[12] Sumardjono MS. Tanah dalam Perspektif Hak Ekonomi Sosial dan Budaya. Yogyakarta: UII Press; 2008.
[13] Moniaga S. Pengakuan Hak Ulayat dan Wilayah Adat dalam Konteks Politik Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: AMAN & Epistema Institute; 2005.
[14] Sanggenafa CO, de Fretes DR, Idris U. Eksistensi Ondofolo dalam dinamika pemerintahan formal Kampung Yobeh. Cenderawasih. Jurnal Antropologi Papua. 2023;4(2):103–17.
[15] Zartman IW, editor. Traditional cures for modern conflicts: African conflict “medicine”. Boulder, CO: Lyn. 2000.
[16] Suebu, M., & Kendi, I. K. Birokrasi Kampung Adat Yo Hele Mabouw dan hubungannya dengan tata ruang (Khani He Kla He). Jurnal Ekologi Birokrasi, 5(3). 2017.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ibrahim Kristofol Kendi, Muh. Akmal Ibrahim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.