Outcome and Accountability in Cross-sector Collaboration in the Implementation of Integrated Slum Area Alleviation with Relocation Pattern in South Bolaang Mongondow Regency

Authors

  • Marzanzius Arvan Ohy Doctoral Candidate of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19467

Keywords:

outcome and accountability, cross-sector collaboration, slum area alleviation

Abstract

Slum problems often occur because of the gap between the need for housing and the low economic status of the community. Slums not only have an impact on the aesthetics of the city, but also have a broad impact on society in terms of health, crime, and economic problems. This research aims to analyze outcomes and accountability in cross-sector collaboration in the implementation of integrated slum alleviation with a relocation pattern in South Bolaang Mongondow Regency. It uses a qualitative approach, and collects data through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. Data sources consist of primary and secondary data, while data analysis is conducted using interactive methods. The informants in this research are stakeholders directly involved in the implementation of the Integrated Slum Upgrading Policy with Relocation Pattern. The findings indicate that outcome and accountability aspects still face potential conflicts, particularly among the relocated communities. These include social disruptions, difficulties adapting to new environments, and adverse economic impacts. Although challenges remain, the policy’s accountability has been formally implemented through legal, social, and economic frameworks, ensuring that each sector fulfills its respective responsibilities in a structured manner.

References

[1] Htwe T, Oo WM, Lwin N, Win KH, Dar HT. Poverty among households living in slum area of Hlaing Tharyar Township, Yangon City, Myanmar. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5(6):2497.

[2] Iryana W. Strategi Mengatasi Kemiskinan Nelayan Eretan Wetan, Indramayu. Historia Madania: Jurnal Ilmu Sejarah. 2020;3(2):89–102.

[3] Biswas D. Has the geography of deprivation changed in post-reform urban India? A Look into relative poverty and access to basic services. GeoScape. 2023;17(1):1–19.

[4] “Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Program Kotaku Menggunakan Gagasan G.C. Homans di Pasar Pandan Air Mati, Kota Solok,” Jurnal Intervensi Sosial dan Pembangunan (JISP), vol. 4, no. 2, 2023, https://doi.org/10.30596/jisp.v4i2.16040.

[5] de Langhe B, Van Osselaer SM, Wierenga B. The effects of process and outcome accountability on judgment process and performance. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2011;115(2):238–52.

[6] Nicholas M, Rouse E, Garner R. Cross-sector collaborations via Facebook: teachers’ use of social media. Aust Educ Res. 2024;51(2):757–79.

[7] Lee S, Kim M. Public perceptions of cross-sector collaboration and sector bias: evidence from a survey experiment. Public Manage Rev. 2024;26(8):2429–51.

[8] Heatly MC, Nichols-Hadeed C, Stiles AA, Alpert-Gillis L. Implementation of a School Mental Health Learning Collaborative Model to Support Cross-Sector Collaboration. School Ment Health. 2023 Apr;15(2):1–18.

[9] Lee KJ, Malinen SK, Nilakant V. The dynamics of cross-sector collaboration in disasters. Disaster Prev Manag. 2023;32(2):337–51.

[10] Virta S, Malmelin N. Managing Organisational Tensions in Cross-Sector Collaboration: The Case of Mediapolis. Media Commun. 2022;10(1):43–53.

[11] Latonen SH, Suominen RM, Juppo AM, Airaksinen M, Seeck H. Organisation of crosssector collaboration and its influence on crisis management effectiveness among pharmaceutical supply chain stakeholders during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health. 2023 Sep;222:196–204.

[12] Adama O. Slum upgrading in the era of World-Class city construction: the case of Lagos, Nigeria. Int J Urban Sustain Dev. 2020;12(2):219–35.

[13] Odziemkowska K, McDonnell MH. Ripple effects: how collaboration reduces social movement contention. Strateg Manage J. 2024;45(4):775–806.

[14] Nú nez Collado JR, Wang HH. Slum upgrading and climate change adaptation and mitigation: Lessons from Latin America. Cities. 2020;104:102791.

[15] Rigon A. Diversity, justice and slum upgrading: an intersectional approach to urban development. Habitat Int. 2022;130:102691.

[16] Zubaidah S, Rusli B, Djaja Saefullah A, Widianingsih I. An overview of slum upgrading programs in developing countries: case study in Indonesia. Cogent Arts Humanit. 2023;10(2):2264021.

[17] Högberg L. Boundary Spanning in Cross-Sector Collaboration: Sensemaking and Framing in a Civil Society Public Partnership Beyond the Crossroads. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. 2024;28(1): https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.2023.16429.

[18] I. Sharon, A. Drach-Zahavy, and E. Srulovici, “The Effect of Outcome vs. Process Accountability-Focus on Performance: A Meta-Analysis,” 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795117.

[19] Högberg B, Lindgren J. Outcome-based accountability regimes in OECD countries: a global policy model? Comp Educ. 2021;57(3):301–21.

[20] Kim S, Trotman KT. The comparative effect of process and outcome accountability in enhancing professional scepticism. Account Finance. 2015;55(4):1015–40.

[21] Häusser JA, Frisch JU, Wanzel S, Schulz-Hardt S. Effects of process and outcome accountability on idea generation. Exp Psychol. 2017 Jul;64(4):262–72.

[22] Muchadenyika D, Waiswa J. Policy, politics and leadership in slum upgrading: A comparative analysis of Harare and Kampala. Cities. 2018;82:58–67.

[23] Marzieh Y. Synthesis of Chalcone-Based Six and Seven Membered Heterocyclic Compounds and Their Biological Activities Againt H1N1 Virus. Ecol Econ. 2016;1(1).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-02

How to Cite

Ohy, M. A. (2025). Outcome and Accountability in Cross-sector Collaboration in the Implementation of Integrated Slum Area Alleviation with Relocation Pattern in South Bolaang Mongondow Regency. KnE Social Sciences, 10(18), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19467