Courtesy and Civic Virtue as Determinants of Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Bureaucratic Human Resource Management: A Study of the Kotamobagu Governmen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19463Keywords:
courtesy, civic virtue, management developmentAbstract
Human resource (HR) capabilities are needed to achieve the effectiveness of public sector services. So, it is necessary to develop agile HR management starting from employee planning, competency improvement, career development, and welfare improvement. This is so that competent, productive, and high integrity human resources can be achieved. This research aims to see how aspects of courtesy and civic virtue in the development of bureaucratic HR management in the Kotamobagu Government can be maximally implemented. It uses a qualitative approach, and data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. Data sources consisted of primary and secondary data, while data analysis was conducted using interactive methods. The informants in this research are stakeholders and other parties directly involved in the implementation of bureaucratic HR management development in Kotamobagu Government. The results show that the development of organizational management in Kotamobagu has begun to build a strong social foundation to support openness and mutual respect. This is implemented with active participation, appreciation of contributions, and leaders who open space for dialogue. However, the reality is that there are still work culture issues, such as leaders who maintain an authoritarian style and make decisions unilaterally without involving their staff. This limits the space for employees to openly express new ideas. Other problems such as passivity and lack of knowledge of government staff are also obstacles to increasing openness to implement bureaucratic HR management.
References
[1] Q. Fan, W. Wider, and C. K. Chan, “The brief introduction to organizational citizenship behaviors and counterproductive work behaviors: a literature review,” 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181930.
[2] dos Santos JJ, Januário FM, Molide A. Bureaucratic entropies in the recruitment and selection process and its effects on public sector career management in Mozambique. Opin Publica. 2022;28(2): https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912022282533.
[3] Junianto SH, Soediantono D, Al-Amin M. Implementation of Structuring Human Resource Management System to Improve Soldier Professionalism in Order to Realize Bureaucratic Reform in the Indonesian Navy. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen. 2021;9(1):250–65.
[4] Chan SH, Kuok OM. Antecedents of civic virtue and altruistic organizational citizenship behavior in Macau. Society and Business Review. 2021;16(1):113–33.
[5] N. E. Snow, “Introduction to the special issue on self, virtue, and public life: Interdisciplinary perspectives on civic virtue,” 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2022.2159639.
[6] Yu P. Diffusion of Innovation theory. Implementation Science. The Key Concepts; 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003109945-16.
[7] Tsai KC, Chou TH, Kittikowit S, Hongsuchon T, Lin YC, Chen SC. Extending Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Service-Oriented Organizational Citizen Behavior. Front Psychol. 2022 Apr;13:839688.
[8] C. A. Tefera and W. D. Hunsaker, “Intangible assets and organizational citizenship behavior: A conceptual model,” 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04497.
[9] Y. Zhang, J. Liao, and J. Zhao, “Research on the organizational citizenship behavior continuum and its consequences,” 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-011-0135-2.
[10] M. E. Milakovich, Digital governance: Applying advanced technologies to improve public service. 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003215875.
[11] Mohd A. Nawawi, M. K. Othman, and M. R. Yussof, “Relationship Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior To Organizational Climate Among Teachers In The State Of Kelantan,” International Journal of Education. Psychology and Counseling. 2022;7(47): https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.747020.
[12] Adams MS. Utopian civic virtue: Bakunin, Kropotkin, and anarchism’s republican inheritance. Polit Res Exch. 2019;1(1):1–27.
[13] Anselmus Dami Z, Imron A, Burhanuddin B, Supriyanto A. Predicting the outcomes of servant leadership in Indonesian Christian higher education: direct and indirect effects. International Journal of Christianity and Education. 2024;28(1):35–70.
[14] Khan NA, Khan AN, Soomro MA, Khan SK. Transformational leadership and civic virtue behavior: valuing act of thriving and emotional exhaustion in the hotel industry. Asia Pacific Management Review. 2020;25(4):216–25.
[15] Graafland J. On Rule of Law, Civic Virtues, Trust, and Happiness. Appl Res Qual Life. 2023;18(4):1799–824.
[16] Call DR, Herber DR. Applicability of the diffusion of innovation theory to accelerate model-based systems engineering adoption. Syst Eng. 2022;25(6):574–83.
[17] Astashova NA, Bondyreva SK, Zhuk OL. Resources of interactive educational space as a basis for the organisation of multicultural education. Obrazovanie i Nauka. 2019;21(3):29–49.
[18] European Environent Agency, “Communication, environment and behaviour: A scpoing study on the links between public communication, environment policy implementation and behavioura science.,” EEA Report, no. 13, 2016.
[19] Auer MR. Covid-19 Crisis Communications: The Challenge for Environmental Organizations. Environ Sci Policy. 2021 Jan;115:151–5.
[20] DeLuque I, Shittu E. Generation capacity expansion under demand, capacity factor and environmental policy uncertainties. Comput Ind Eng. 2019;127:601–13.
[21] L. Rademaker, Indigenous Self-Determination in Australia: Histories and Historiography. 2020. . https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bvncz1.
[22] P. Elsmore, Organisational culture: Organisational change? 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315186917
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sahaya Subagio Mokoginta

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.