Governing Extreme Poverty at the Local Level: A Thematic Network Study from Jeneponto, Indonesia

Authors

  • ‎ Widyawati Student doctoral Public Administration, Hasanuddin University/Public Administration, Sembilanbelas November Kolaka University
  • ‎ Sangkala Public Administration, Hasanuddin University
  • Muhammad Rusdi Public Administration, Hasanuddin University
  • Muh. Akmal Ibrahim Public Administration, Hasanuddin University
  • Gita Susanti Public Administration

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19452

Keywords:

extreme poverty, integrative governance, local innovation, cross-sector collaboration, data interoperability, adaptive policy

Abstract

This study examines the dynamics of local governance in extreme poverty alleviation efforts in Jeneponto District, Indonesia, one of the national priority areas for accelerating the eradication of extreme poverty. Using a qualitative case study approach, this study integrates document analysis and in-depth interviews with stakeholders from local government and the community. The analysis process was conducted using Atlas. Ti software version 23 through a word frequency approach and thematic network mapping to visualize patterns of relations between actors, institutions, and governance mechanisms. Key findings identify seven interrelated thematic clusters: 1. Planning and policy frameworks. 2. Program implementation and evaluation. 3. Cross-sector collaboration. 4. Contextual innovation and solutions. 5. Public communication and participation. 6. Data governance. 7. Structural barriers. Although planning documents formally prioritize poverty alleviation, the absence of a specific nomenclature for “extreme poverty,” fragmentation of data systems, and institutional rigidities have hampered program effectiveness. Local innovation has not been integrated into the formal planning system, while sectoral egos and weak coordination structures hamper collaboration between sectors. This study enriches the theoretical discourse on integrative and adaptive governance by showing how institutional fragmentation, low data interoperability, and limited participatory mechanisms limit the capacity of local responses to the complexities of extreme poverty. Key recommendations include institutionalizing innovation, building integrated data systems across sectors, and strengthening inclusive, evidence-based, and reflective governance of socio-economic vulnerabilities at the local level.

References

[1] Carpentier CL, Braun H. Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development: A powerful global framework. J. Int. Counc. Small Bus. 2020;1(1):14–23.

[2] Jin Z, Ialnazov D. Governance Challenges and Solutions of the Solar Energy for Poverty Alleviation Program in China: The Case of Jinzhai County. J. Asian Energy Stud. 2023;7:20–38.

[3] Kamruzzaman P. Understanding Extreme Poverty in the Words of the Poor–A Bangladesh Case Study. J Poverty. 2021;25(3):193–216.

[4] Darma AV, Wicesa NA, Setyanti AM, Maulidi TR. Is Extreme Poverty in Indonesia is Going to End? J. Indones. Appl. Econ. 2024;12(1):126–36.

[5] Gai A, Ernan R, Fauzi A, Barus B, Putra D. Poverty Reduction Through Adaptive Social Protection and Spatial Poverty Model in Labuan Bajo, Indonesia’s National Strategic Tourism Areas. Sustainability (Basel). 2025;17(2):1–17.

[6] Rudiyansyah and N. I. Saiful. “Policy Model for Empowering Poor Farmers in Jeneponto District,” in 1st Doctoral International Conference 2023, 2023, pp. 656– 665.

[7] Ansell C, Torfing J. Public Innovation Through Collaboration and Design. London: Routledge; 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203795958.

[8] Stout M, Love J. Integrative Governance : Generating Sustainable Responses to Global Crises, no. October. New York: Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315526294.

[9] Visseren-hamakers IJ. “A framework for analyzing and practicing Integrative Governance : The case of global animal and conservation governance,” Environ. Plan. C Polit. Sp., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–24, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418788565.

[10] I. J. Visseren-hamakers, “Integrative governance : The relationships between governance instruments taking center stage,” 2 Environ. Plan. C Polit. Sp. 0(0), vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–14, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X18803634.

[11] Lawelai H, Nurmandi A. The Model of Collaborative Governance in Addressing Poverty in Indonesia. J. Ranah Publik Indones. Kontemporer. 2022;2(2):195–206.

[12] Monkelbaan J. Governance for the Sustainable Development Goals: Exploring an Integrative Framework of Theories, Tools, and Competencies. Singapore: Springer; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0475-0.

[13] Visseren-hamakers IJ. ScienceDirect Integrative environmental governance : enhancing governance in the era of synergies. Environ Sustain (Singap). 2015;:136– 43.

[14] B. W. Head, Wicked Problems in Public Policy: Understanding and Responding to Complex Challenges. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94580-0.

[15] Yasmin T, Farrelly M, Rogers BC. Adaptive governance: a catalyst for advancing sustainable urban transformation in the global South. Int J Water Resour Dev. 2020;36(5):818–38.

[16] Wurtzebach Z, Schultz C, Waltz AE, Esch BE, Wasserman TN. Adaptive governance and the administrative state: knowledge management for forest planning in the western United States. Reg Environ Change. 2019;19(8):2651–66.

[17] Wallis SE, Wright B. Integrative propositional analysis for understanding and reducing poverty. Kybernetes. 2019;48(6):1264–77.

[18] Neto IT, Silva KL, Guimar aes RA; I. T. Tools used in nursing education to assess attitudes about poverty: an integrative review. Public Health Nurs. 2022 Sep;39(5):1089–97.

[19] Amiraslani F, Dragovich D. A Social Dimension of Adaptation and Mitigation of Climate Change: Empowering Local Rural Communities to Confront Extreme Poverty. Climate (Basel). 2023;11(12):240.

[20] Hossain MZ, Rahman MA. Adaptation to climate change as resilience for urban extreme poor: lessons learned from targeted asset transfers programmes in Dhaka city of Bangladesh. Environ Dev Sustain. 2018;20(1):407–32.

[21] Mustari N, Razak R, Junaedi J, Fatmawati F, Hawing H, Baharuddin T. Multipartner governance and the urgency of poverty alleviation policy: zakat fundraising management. Cogent Soc Sci. 2024;10(1):1–16.

[22] Rulinawaty S, Aripin S, Andriyansah NA, Samboteng L. Aripin, Andriyansah, and L. Samboteng, “Participatory governance capacity building: the missing link of poverty eradication in food diversification policies in Indonesia,”. Electron. Gov. 2023;19(2):202–20.

[23] Olken BA. Designing Anti-Poverty Programs in Emerging Economies in the 21st Century: lessons from Indonesia for the World. Bull Indones Econ Stud. 2019;55(3):319–39.

[24] Yin RK. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. London: SAGE Publications; 2018.

[25] Leifeld P. Policy debates and discourse network analysis: A research agenda. Politics Gov. 2020;8(2):180–3.

[26] Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry Research Design. Choosing Among Five Approaches; 2018.

[27] Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2008;18(4):543–71.

[28] Djosetro M, Arts B. How Polycentric Governance Affects Nature Conservation in Practice : The Case of Two Coastal Protected Areas in Suriname. Int J Commons. 2024;18(1):601–17.

[29] Yerkes MA, Javornik J, Jansen E, Kurowska A. From the Capability Approach to Capability-Based Social Policy. Social Policy and The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measurements and Application. Cambridge University Press; 2022. pp. 147–56.

[30] Máhr T, Németh EJ. “Examining the Impact of Local Developments and Effective Governance to Foster Social Innovation Practices,” in European Conference on Knowledge Management, 2024, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 460–469.

[31] Li Z, et al. Amalur: Data Integration Meets Machine Learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2024;36(12):7353–67.

[32] Vivier E, Sanchez-Betancourt D. Participatory governance and the capacity to engage: A systems lens. Public Adm Dev. 2023;43(3):220–31.

[33] Mutiarin D, Eldo DH, Sarofah R, Habibullah A. Data Interoperability in Supporting Electronic-Based Governance Systems in the Local Government. Corp. Law Gov. Rev. 2024;6(4):43–52.

[34] Emerson K, Nabatchi T. Collaborative Governance Regimes. Washington (D.C.): Georgetown University Press; 2015.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-02

How to Cite

Widyawati, ‎, Sangkala, ‎, Rusdi, M., Ibrahim, M. A., & Susanti, G. (2025). Governing Extreme Poverty at the Local Level: A Thematic Network Study from Jeneponto, Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 10(18), 114–142. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19452