Strategy for Strengthening the Capacity of Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus to Increase the Effectiveness of Internal Supervision

Authors

  • John Sansri Nibel Doctoral Program in Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar
  • Muhammad Yunus Doctoral Program in Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar
  • ‎ Syahribulan Doctoral Program in Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19449

Keywords:

institutional capacity, capacity strengthening, supervision, transparency, accountability

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the capacity of the government’s Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) and identify the main challenges that hinder the effectiveness of internal supervision at the South Sulawesi Police Inspectorate. In addition, this study also aims to formulate a strategy to strengthen the capacity of APIP to support more transparent, accountable, and professional police governance. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study method, thematic analysis, and NVivo 12 Plus assistance. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, document studies, and observations. The findings of this study indicate that the effectiveness of internal supervision of APIP in the South Sulawesi regional police is hampered by various challenges, such as limited human resource competency that has not fully mastered risk-based audit techniques and information technology, lack of policies that are responsive to dynamics in the field, limited use of technology in supervision, and low cross-unit coordination that result in inconsistencies in reporting and follow-up of recommendations. Therefore, comprehensive reform is needed by strengthening human resource capacity, developing adaptive policies, and implementing more effective technology and coordination systems. Capacity-building strategies include enhancing competence through ongoing training and professional certification, preparing integrated standard operating procedures (SOPs), and utilizing information technology to improve the efficiency and transparency of supervision. These efforts are expected to foster more effective, transparent, responsive, and results-oriented internal supervision, thereby supporting the achievement of better governance.

References

[1] BPK. (2008). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 60 Tahun 2008 tentang Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah. peraturan.bpk.go.id. bpk.go.id. Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/4876

[2] Yue L, Liu Q. How anti-corruption actions win hearts: the evaluation of anticorruption performance, social inequality and political trust—Evidence from the Asian Barometer Survey and the Latino Barometer Survey. Int J Comp Sociol. 2023;2025: https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152231211483.

[3] Cuèllar MF, Stephenson MC. Taming systemic corruption: the American experience and its implications for contemporary debates. World Dev. 2022;155:105755.

[4] Dewi NN, Sjarif FA. (2024). Design of Government Organs to Achieve Regulatory Reform in Indonesia: Learning from Malaysia and Vietnam. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 23(1): 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i1.3997

[5] Hermanto B, Haryadi B, Musyarofah S. (2020). Following The Role of The Government’s Internal Supervision Personnel in The Supervision Environment. International Colloquium on Forensics Accounting and Governance (ICFAG), 1(1): 51– 65. Retrieved from https://conference.trunojoyo.ac.id/pub/icfag/article/view/11/15

[6] Ibrahim AH, Baharuddin T, Wance M. Bibliometric Analysis of E-Government and Trust : A Lesson for Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator. 2023;19(3):269–84.

[7] Grindle MS. (1997). Getting Good Government: Capacity Building in the Public Sectors of Developing Countries. Merilee S. Grindle. Harvard University. Harvard Institute for International Development,Harvard University. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=PlfvgAACAAJ& hl=in&source=gbs_book_other_versions_r&cad=3

[8] Walker M, Fan SX, Huang X, Bartram T. The role of Australian local government in economic development: building international engagement capacity. Aust J Public Adm. 2024;83(1):3–23.

[9] Annan-Prah EC, Andoh RP. Effects of customised capacity building on employee engagement, empowerment, and learning in Ghanaian local government institutions. Public Adm Policy. 2023;26(2):228–41.

[10] Lloyd D, Williams E, Terrill D. Critical appraisal of the establishment of a theoryinformed evaluation capacity building function in a large government department. Eval J Australas. 2022;22(3):142–56.

[11] Bhagavathula S, Brundiers K, Stauffacher M, Kay B. Fostering collaboration in city governments’ sustainability, emergency management and resilience work through competency-based capacity building. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021;63:102408.

[12] Derrig R, Grainger C, Hassanali K, Bateh F. Protecting the Ocean in the Contemporary International Order: Capacity-Building and Technology Transfer from the Stockholm Declaration to the BBNJ Agreement. Int J Mar Coast Law. 2024;39(3):571–82.

[13] Bezuidenhout L, Stirling J, Sanga VL, Nyakyi PT, Mwakajinga GA, Bowman R. Combining development, capacity building and responsible innovation in GCRFfunded medical technology research. Dev World Bioeth. 2022 Dec;22(4):276–87.

[14] Zia ud din, M., Yuan yuan, X., Khan, N. U., & Han, H. (2023). Linking local collaborative governance and public service delivery: mediating role of institutional capacity building. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1): 41599. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02421-3.

[15] Hardyman W, Garner S, Lewis JJ, Callaghan R, Williams E, Dalton A, et al. Enhancing public service innovation through value co-creation: capacity building and the ‘innovative imagination.’. Public Money Manag. 2022;42(5):332–40.

[16] Qian J. Improving Policy Design and Building Capacity in Local Experiments: Equalization of Public Service in China’s Urban-rural Integration Pilot. Public Adm Dev. 2017;37(1):51–64.

[17] Gazali M, Hisanuddin LO, Rasmuin. Fungsi Pengawasan Internal Oleh Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (Apip) Pada Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Buton Selatan. Governance (Oxford). 2024;12(2):168–80.

[18] Rumasukun MR. Developing Auditor Competencies through Continuous Training and Education. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research. 2024;4(1):14–23.

[19] Nurdin M, Baharuddin T. (2023). Capacity Building Challenges and Strategies in the Development of New Capital City of Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(2): 221–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.221- 232https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.221-232.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-02

How to Cite

Nibel, J. S., Yunus, M., & Syahribulan, ‎. (2025). Strategy for Strengthening the Capacity of Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus to Increase the Effectiveness of Internal Supervision. KnE Social Sciences, 10(18), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19449