International Collaboration for Grassroots Social Innovation: An Analysis of Agents, Goals, Drivers, and Processes of the SUIJI Program

Authors

  • Ohashi Koichi Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University
  • Sukri Tamma Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University
  • Muhammad Akmal Ibrahim Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University
  • ‎ Hasniati Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University
  • Dorothea Agnes Rampisela Sago Research and Development Center, Hasanuddin University, Tamalanrea Indah, Tamalanrea District, Makassar, 90245, South Sulawesi
  • Oktaviani Nelsi Sago Research and Development Center, Hasanuddin University, Tamalanrea Indah, Tamalanrea District, Makassar, 90245, South Sulawesi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19443

Keywords:

international collaboration, grassroots social innovation, capability approach, SUIJI

Abstract

International collaboration is increasingly recognized as a significant driver in addressing social and environmental challenges, particularly through grassroots social innovation. This study uses the capability approach to explore the role of the Six Universities Initiative Japan-Indonesia (SUIJI) in supporting community-based social innovation in Indonesia. The aim is to analyze how cross-cultural collaboration between Japanese and Indonesian students influences the capabilities of local communities. This research employs a qualitative approach with a case study method. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis. The research participants included students, faculty members, and local community leaders in the SUIJI program. The findings indicate that the SUIJI program successfully enhanced local community capabilities, particularly regarding technical skills and participation in decision-making processes. However, Japanese students faced cultural adaptation challenges due to differences in work approaches and the absence of communitybased programs in their curriculum. To address this, it is recommended that universities in Japan integrate programs like Kuliah Kerja Nyata (KKN) into their curricula. These findings have important implications for higher education policy and highlight the need for curriculum adaptation to improve the effectiveness of international collaboration in grassroots social innovation. This study underscores the critical role of community ownership, local capacity building, and institutional support in sustaining grassroots innovation. Furthermore, it provides valuable insights into how the integration of the capability approach within social innovation practices can have a transformative impact on cross-national educational collaborations.

References

[1] Seyfang G, Haxeltine A. Growing grassroots innovations: exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions. Environ Plan C Gov Policy. 2012 Jun;30(3):381–400.

[2] Pellicer-Sifres V, Belda-Miquel S, López-Fogués A, Boni A. Grassroots social innovation for human development: an analysis of alternative food networks in the city of Valencia (Spain). J Human Dev Capabil. 2017 Apr;18(2):258–74.

[3] Sen A. Development as freedom. Knopf Press; 1999.

[4] Crocker DA. Ethics of global development: Agency, capability, and deliberative democracy. Cambridge University Press; 2008. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492594.

[5] Robeyns I. The capability approach: A theoretical survey. J Hum Dev. 2005;6(1):93– 114.

[6] Walker M, Unterhalter E. Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education. Palgrave Macmillan; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230604810.

[7] Moulaert F, Martinelli F, Swyngedouw E, Gonzalez S. Introduction: social innovation and governance in European cities. Eur Urban Reg Stud. 2007;14(3):195–209.

[8] Schot J, Geels FW. Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technol Anal Strateg Manage. 2008;20(5):537–54.

[9] Neumeier S. Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research? Proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. Sociol Ruralis. 2012 Jan;52(1):48–69.

[10] Alekseyenko L, Tulai O, Dmytryshyn M, Bulavynets V, Savchuk S. Information Support for Financial Communication of Economic Recovery. In A. B. & H. A. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems: Vol. 1083 LNNS (pp. 269–282). Springer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67431-0_26.

[11] Blavette, L., Dacunha, S., Harzo, C., & Pino, M. Participatory design for gerontechnology solutions: Developing and assessing social robots for their integration in geriatric care institutions. Gerontechnology, 23, 6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4017/GT.2024.23.S.

[12] Yin RK. Case study research: Design and methods. 4th ed. SAGE Publications; 2009.

[13] Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. SAGE Publications; 2014.

[14] Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. SAGE Publications; 2014.

[15] Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications; 2009.

[16] Bowen GA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J. 2009;9(2):27–40.

[17] Denzin NK. The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill; 1978.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-02

How to Cite

Koichi, O., Tamma, S., Ibrahim, M. A., Hasniati, ‎, Rampisela, D. A., & Nelsi, O. (2025). International Collaboration for Grassroots Social Innovation: An Analysis of Agents, Goals, Drivers, and Processes of the SUIJI Program. KnE Social Sciences, 10(18), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19443