Village Capacity Development (Study of Banjarsari Sub-district, Lebak Regency)

Authors

  • Arifiani Widjayanti Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta
  • Eddy Kusponco Wibowo Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta
  • Heny Handayani Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta
  • Rifat Denishwara Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i15.19211

Keywords:

village capacity, underdeveloped village, institutionalization, governance, human resources

Abstract

According to the Village Development Index, in the years between 2015 and 2022, the number of very underdeveloped villages was reduced from 13,453 to 4438. In Lebak Regency, Banten Province, from 340 villages, 103 are underdeveloped, 209 are developing, and 28 villages are classified as developed. This research focused on Banjarsari Sub-district, Lebak Regency, Banten Province. It used qualitative research methods such as preliminary field exploration and brainstorming. Three aspects of village capacity development, namely institutional, management, and human resources, were examined. The results indicated several village enterprises (Bumdes) were not functioning correctly regarding institutions. Regarding management, internet/digitalization facilities have yet to be fully exploited by the community, offices, and business community. Regarding human resources, most villagers’ formal education reaches up to junior high school level. Through this research, it is hoped that the gap between underdeveloped, developing, developed, and independent villages in Kabupaten Lebak can be better understood, and measures can be found to develop the capacity of the village so that it has the competitiveness to become a developing developed and independent village.

References

[1] Suyadi A. Erna Handayani NT. Perumusan Aktivitas Capacity Building bagi Perangkat Desa, Pengurus Badan Usaha Milik Desa dan Lembaga Kemasyarakatan Desa menuju Desa Mandiri Berkelanjutan. J Pengabdi Kpd Masy. 2022;1(3):174–81.

[2] Mukaddas J. Analisis Kelembagaan Desa Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pesisir Kawasan Daerah Perlindungan Laut Kecamatan Soropia Kabupaten Konawe. SIBATIK J J Ilm Bid Sos Ekon Budaya, Teknol dan Pendidik. 2021;1(1):77–84. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i1.77.

[3] Cahya AD, Rahmadani DA, Wijiningrum A, Swasti FF. Analisis Pelatihan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. YUME J Manag. 2021;4(2):230–42.

[4] Saptana, Indraningsih KS, Hastuti EL. Analisis Kelembagaan Kemitraan Usaha Di Sentra Sentra Produksi Sayuran (Suatu Kajian Atas Kasus Kelembagaan Kemitraan Usaha di Bali, Sumatera Utara, dan Jawa Barat). SOCA J Sos Ekon Pertan. 2007;7(3).

[5] Menteri K, Perah RS, Johnson DP, Sosiologi T, Pustaka G. Koentjaraningrat, 1997 ., Metode-Metode Peneliiian Masyarakat, Gramedia ’ milik PERPUSTAKAAN. 2003;154–6.

[6] Hardianto H, Hamyana H, Sule S. Kapasitas Gapoktan Dalam Mengembangkan Program Pengembangan Usaha Pangan Masyarakat Di Desa Watu Gede, Singosari- Malang. Agriekstensia. 2016;16(2):319–27.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-17

How to Cite

Widjayanti, A., Wibowo, E. K., Handayani, H., & Denishwara, R. (2025). Village Capacity Development (Study of Banjarsari Sub-district, Lebak Regency). KnE Social Sciences, 10(15), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i15.19211