Sustainable Solutions to Poverty: Is BLT Truly a Pro-poor Policy?

Authors

  • Amelia Putri Department of Public Administration, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0069-512X
  • Loudewyk Bessie Department of Public Administration, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung
  • Jovita Anabelle Department of Public Administration, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung
  • Trisno Herwanto Department of Public Administration, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i15.19172

Keywords:

direct cash transfers, pro-poor policy, sustainable poverty solutions

Abstract

Structural poverty has been an ongoing issue that plagues Indonesia. The situation worsened during the COVID-19 era, revealing the social inequity between lower-class and higher-class citizens, and creating an urgency for the Indonesian government to implement a policy approach oriented towards the needs of the impoverished community (pro-poor policy). A government aid program was created to tackle this issue in the form of an unconditional cash program called Direct Cash Transfers (BLT). However, the sustainability of this program as a long-term solution was put into question. This study aims to solve whether BLT is truly a sustainable pro-poor approach to poverty. Various literature reviews would be used to formulate a conceptual framework to define pro-poor policies. Based on secondary data analysis, BLT is found to lean towards a viral-based policy rather than a pro-poor policy. The success of BLT implementation is often misused and weaponized for politicians’ private agendas and fails to create lasting effects and independence within the lower-class communities, trapping vulnerable people in the poverty cycle. The inability of the BLT program to provide access to various assets for its citizens and its hasty creation cemented the conclusion that BLT is not a pro-poor policy.

References

[1] Indonesia BP. Profil Kemiskinan di Indonesia Maret 2023 [Internet]. www.bps.go.id. 2023. Available from: https://www.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2023/07/17/2016/profil- kemiskinan-di-indonesia-maret-2023.html

[2] Khomsan A, Dharmawan AH. Saharuddin, Alfiasari, Dadang Sukandar, Hidayat Syarief. Indikator Kemiskinan dan Misklasifikasi Orang Miskin. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia; 2015.

[3] Suryahadi A, Izzati RA, Suryadarma D. The Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Poverty: An Estimation for Indonesia | The SMERU Research Institute [Internet]. smeru.or.id. Available from: https://smeru.or.id/en/publication/impact-covid-19-outbreak-poverty- estimation-indonesia

[4] Putri CA. 60% Industri Lumpuh karena Corona, Bagaimana Memulihkannya? [Internet]. CNBC Indonesia. cnbcindonesia.com; 2020 [cited 2024 Oct 13]. Avail- able from: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20200505162525-4-156501/60- industri-lumpuh-karena-corona-bagaimana-memulihkannya

[5] Afrianto D. Pandemi: Dari Kesehatan, Ekonomi, hingga Politik [Internet]. kompas.id. Harian Kompas; 2020 [cited 2024 Oct 13]. Available from: https://www.kompas.id/baca/riset/2020/07/17/pandemi-dari-kesehatan-ekonomi- hingga-politik

[6] Nafi’ah B. Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Dapat Mempengaruhi Pengentasan Kemiski- nan. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam. 2021 Jul 1;7(2).

[7] Rahmanto F, Firmansyah MI, Purwaningsih T, Rafi M. Politik Anggaran: Alokasi Dana Bansos Pra-pemilihan Presiden 2019 di Indonesia Sebagai Alat Meningkatkan Elektabilitas [ Jurnal Wacana Politik]. JWP. 2021 Mar;6(1):26.

[8] Lewis O. The Culture of Poverty. 1975.

[9] Sa’diyah El Adawiyah. Kemiskinan dan Faktor-Faktor Penyebabnya. Journal of Social Work and Social Service. 2020 Apr;1(1):43–50.

[10] Alfian, Tan MG, Soemardjan S. Kemiskinan Struktural. Jakarta: YIIS; 1980.

[11] Ibid no.10

[12] Wulansari I. The Paradox of Development on Structural Poverty in Papua. Jurnal Sosi- ologi Pendidikan Humanis. 2018;2(2):88–95. Available from: https://www.academia. edu/102147324/The_Paradox_of_Development_on_Structural_Poverty_in_Papua

[13] Pernia E. Pro-poor Growth: What is It and How is It Important? ERD POLICY BRIEF [Internet]. 2003;(17). Available from: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/ publication/28075/pb017.pdf

[14] Ahmadi R. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Miskin: Pendekatan Modal Manusia (Studi Layanan Publik tentang Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Miskin yang Diselenggarakan oleh BPM-KB dan Posko 100 di Kota Surabaya). DIA [Internet]. 1Dec.2012 [cited 13Oct.2024];10(2):16 -31. Available from: https://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/dia/ article/view/%23286

[15] Kate B, Busse S. Pro-poor policy An overview. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, and Overseas Development Institute. 2006. https://www.shareweb. ch/site/Poverty-Wellbeing/resources/Archive%20files/Pro-Poor%20Policy%20- %20An%20Overview%202006.pdf

[16] Todaro MP, Smith SC. Economic Development. 7th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2015.

[17] World Bank. Resilience, equity, and opportunity: The World Bank’s social protection and labor strategy 2012–2022 [Internet]. World Bank; 2012. Avail- able from: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/443791468157506768/ pdf/732350BR0CODE200doc0version0REVISED.pdf

[18] Snyder H. Literature Review as a Research methodology: an Overview and Guidelines [Internet]. J Bus Res. 2019 Nov;104(1):333–9. Available from: https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319304564

[19] Johnston MP. Secondary Data Analysis: a Method of Which the Time Has Come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries [Internet]. 2014;3(3):619–26. Available from: https://www.qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/169/170

[20] Rachmawati D. Penyaluran BLT BBM Salah Sasaran, Pengamat Duga Data Kemensos Tidak Realtime [Internet]. Gatra.com. Gatra; 2022 [cited 2024 Oct 13]. Available from: https://www.gatra.com/news-554262-nasional-penyaluran-blt-bbm- salah-sasaran-pengamat-duga-data-kemensos-tidak-realtime.html

[21] Nugroho RA. Bansos Jokowi Kurang Nendang! BLT Tak Cukup Rp 400.000 [Internet]. CNBC Indonesia. cnbcindonesia.com; 2023 [cited 2024 Oct 13]. Available from: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20231108063214-4-487208/ bansos-jokowi-kurang-nendang-blt-tak-cukup-rp-400000

[22] Statistik BP. Pertumbuhan Produk Domestik Bruto (PDB) 2022-2023. 2023. www.bps.go.id

[23] Pusat BS. Perkembangan Gini Ratio Indonesia Periode Maret 2020-2023. 2023. www.bps.go.id

[24] Agustina I, Hendra A. Implementasi Kebijakan Bantuan Langsung Tunai (BLT) Bagi Masyarakat Terdampak Covid-19 di Kecamatan Cileunyi Kabupaten Bandung [ Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Publik]. JEKP. 2021 Dec;8(2):132–44.

[25] Jatmiko A. Sejarah Bansos: Inisiasi SBY, Makin Gencar Diguyur di Era Jokowi [Internet]. Katadata.co.id. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 13]. Available from: https://katadata.co.id/ekonopedia/sejarah-ekonomi/65dc469db23b2/sejarah- bansos-inisiasi-sby-makin-gencar-diguyur-di-era-jokowi

[26] Desa R. Ketentuan Dalam Pelaksanaan Bantuan Langsung Tunai (BLT) [Internet]. MEDIA DESA. 2020 [cited 2024 Oct 13]. Available from: https://mediadesa.org/ ketentuan-dalam-pelaksanaan-bantuan-langsung-tunai-blt/

[27] Ramains. BLT BBM Tidak Efektif, Masyarakat Pilih Subsidi Atas Barang [Internet]. Ramains.com. 2021 [cited 2024 Oct 13]. Available from: https://ramains.com/artikel/ blt-bbm-tidak-efektif-masyarakat-pilih-subsidi-atas-barang/

[28] Otheliansyah G, Hizwar R. Pengaruh Bantuan Langsung Tunai Dana Desa dan Kemandirian Desa di Masa Pandemi terhadap Kemiskinan Desa di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Perbendaharaan [Internet]. 2023 Dec 31 [cited 2024 Oct 2];4(2):94–105. Available from: https://jmp.kemenkeu.go.id/index.php/mapan/article/view/409

Downloads

Published

2025-07-17

How to Cite

Putri, A., Bessie, L., Anabelle, J., & Herwanto, T. (2025). Sustainable Solutions to Poverty: Is BLT Truly a Pro-poor Policy?. KnE Social Sciences, 10(15), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i15.19172