Strengthening the Merit System in Accelerating Bureaucratic Reform in Tangerang Regency

Authors

  • Ardy Firman Syah Research Center For Domestic Governance, Research Organization for Governance, Economy, and Community Welfare, National Research and Innovation Agency, South Jakarta https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2899-3713
  • ‎ Marsono Research Center For Domestic Governance
  • Slamet Rahmat Topo Susilo Research Center for Social Welfare, Village, and Connectivity, Research Organization for Governance, Economy, and Community Welfare, National Research and Innovation Agency, South Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i15.19151

Keywords:

bureaucratic reform, merit system, career patterns, root cause analysis, Tangerang Regency

Abstract

Bureaucratic reform is a key innovation aimed at enhancing efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability in government operations. A critical component of this reform is the merit system index, which serves as one of the key indicators in evaluating the success of general bureaucratic reform. This study aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the merit system assessment indicators in Tangerang Regency, Indonesia. Using a qualitative approach and the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) method, the research investigates the underlying causes of challenges in implementing the merit system. The findings reveal that a major issue in strengthening the merit system lies in the continued occurrence of promotions that are not based on competence and performance. To address this issue, a SWOT analysis was conducted to identify opportunities and formulate action plans for improvement. The study proposes integrating a Career Pattern System based on job competency development needs as part of the bureaucratic reform roadmap to reinforce the merit-based system.

References

[1] Anderson B. Root Cause Analysis: A Step-by-Step Guide to Using the Right Tool at the Right Time. Productivity Press; 2018.

[2] Bryman A. Social Research Methods. 4th ed. Oxford University Press; 2012.

[3] Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. SAGE Publications; 2014.

[4] Daraba D. Reformasi Birokrasi & Pelayanan Publik. Makassar: Leisyah; 2019. 10–11 p.

[5] Dwiyanto A. Reformasi Birokrasi Publik Di Indonesia. 1st ed. Vol. 1. DI Yogyakarta: UGM Press; 2010. 15–20 p.

[6] Ishikawa K. Guide to Quality Control. Asian Productivity Organization; 1982.

[7] Kotler P, Keller KL. Marketing Management. 15th ed. Pearson; 2016.

[8] Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). S; 2015.

[9] Romli L. MASALAH REFORMASI BIROKRASI. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen PNS [Internet]. 2008 Mar 4 [cited 2024 Aug 5];2(2):1–8. Available from: https://jurnal.bkn.go.id/index.php/CivilServant/article/view/149

[10] Rooney JJ, Heuvel LN. Root Cause Analysis for Beginners. Qual Prog. 2004;37(7):45– 53.

[11] Serrat O. Root Cause Analysis. In Knowledge Solutions; 2017 (pp. 741-749). Springer.

[12] PANRB Ministerial Team. Results of the Tangerang Regency Regional Government - LKE KEMENPANRB. DKI Jakarta; 2023.

[13] PANRB Ministerial Circular Letter No. 10/2021 concerning the Assessment of the Implementation of Civil Servant Talent Management in Government Agencies

Downloads

Published

2025-07-17

How to Cite

Syah, A. F., Marsono, ‎, & Susilo, S. R. T. (2025). Strengthening the Merit System in Accelerating Bureaucratic Reform in Tangerang Regency. KnE Social Sciences, 10(15), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i15.19151