Women's Role In Conflict Management Of Social Forestry : A Case Of Sungai Buluh Village
Abstract
This research explored forest management goals - conservation and socio-economic goals. It is seen that the goal of socio-economic reduces forest conservation. The ideological conflict between the two approaches can be overcome through the management of property rights and access to forest resource utilization that is not for the purpose of local interests. Ownership rights to land in Minangkabau are in the hands of women, but men have the ability to determine the use of the land. The difference between property rights and access rights between women and men in processing customary land and Nagari land is a means of resolving conflicts between the government, traditional leaders and land managers in processing social forestry in the inheritance and matrilineal system of the Minangkabau community. This study focused on the role women play in conflict management of social forests in Nagari Sungai Buluh. From the results of research conducted using qualitative research methods and case study approaches, it was found that the role of women in conflict management included bringing together the community and the government in meetings discussing the planning and management of social forestry
Keywords: confluct management, feminist perspective, social forestry, sustainable development.
References
[1] Poncelet EC. “A kiss here and a kiss there”: conflict and collaboration in environmental partnerships. Environ Manage. 2001 Jan;27(1):13–25.
[2] Bowcutt F. Ecological Restoration and Local Communities: A Case Study from Sinkyone Wilderness State Park, Mendocino County, California. Hum Ecol . [Internet]. 1999;27(2):359–68. Available from: www.jstor.org/stable/4603323.
[3] Brown D. Principles and Practice of Forest Co-Management: Evidence from West- Central Africa. Eur Union Trop For Pap [Internet]. 1999;2:33 pp. Available from: agris.fao.org
[4] Piccolo JJ. Celebrating Aldo Leopold’s land ethic at 70. Conserv Biol. 2020 Dec;34(6):1586–8.
[5] Agboola A. African Journal of Public Administration and Management. African J Public Adm Manag. 2020;XXVII(2):1–14.
[6] Zakie M. Konflik Agraria Yang Tak Pernah Reda. J Ilm Huk Leg. 2017;24(1):40.
[7]Nzuza P, Ramoelo A, Odindi J. A triangulation approach for assessing and mapping land degradation in the Lepellane catchment of the greater Sekhukhune District, South Africa. Geogr J [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03736245.2021.2000481
[8] Castro AP, Nielsen E. Indigenous People And Co-Management: Implications For Conflict Management. Environ Sci Policy. 2001;4(4–5):229–39.
[9] Holm P, Hersoug B, Rånes S. Revisiting Lofoten: Co-Managing Fish Stocks or Fishing Space? Hum Organ. 2000;59(3):353–64.
[10] Adger WN, Brown K, Tompkins EL. The Political Economy of Cross-Scale Networks in Resource co-Management. Ecol Soc. 2005;10(2):art9.
[11] Minnery J. Urban Planners and Role Conflicts. Urban Policy Res. 1985;3(1):25–30.
[12] Albert C, Von Haaren C, Cruz APS, BAW, Bayley C, French S, et al. The participatory process for supporting collaborative management of natural resources: An overview. Food Agric Organ United Nations. 2013;25(3):543–55.
[13] Elmhirst R. Introducing New Feminist Political Ecologies [Internet]. Geoforum. 2011;42(2):129–32.
[14] Butler J. Precarious Life: THe Powers Of Mourning And Violence. London: Verso; 2004.
[15] Sharp J. Geography And Gender: What Belongs to Feminist Geography? Emotion, Power And Change. Prog Hum Geogr. 2009;33(1):74–80.
[16] Ribot JC, Peluso NL. A Theory of Access. Rural Sociol. 2003;68(2):153–81.
[17] Kato T. Change and Continuity In The Minangkabau Matrilineal System. Indonesia. 1978;25(25):1–16.
[18] Fendi Agus Syaputra. Faruq El Pikaso, Indah Sari Rahmaini A. Institusi Pertanahan Minangkabau Dan Perhutanan Sosial: Jalan Penyelesaian Konflik Tanah. 1st ed. Padang: Andalas University Press; 2023. 79 pp.