Download fulltext HTML
Awwaliyah, I. N., Wilantari, R. N., Susanto, A. B., Prajitiasari, E. D., & Sukandar, G. (2024). Corporate Governance Couture: Tailoring Financial Performance in the Indonesian Textile and Garment Sector. KnE Social Sciences, 9(21), 266–285. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i21.16689

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i21.16689

statistics

  • 29 Abstract Views
  • 8 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Intan Nurul Awwaliyah

    Intan Nurul Awwaliyah

    Department of Management, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Jember
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1051-7818
  • Regina Niken Wilantari

    Regina Niken Wilantari

    Department of Development Economics, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Jember
  • Arnis Budi Susanto

    Arnis Budi Susanto

    Department of Management, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Jember
  • Ema Desia Prajitiasari

    Ema Desia Prajitiasari

    Department of Management, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Jember
  • Gabriella Sukandar

    Gabriella Sukandar

    Department of Management, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Jember

Published Date

  • Jul 31, 2024

Corporate Governance Couture: Tailoring Financial Performance in the Indonesian Textile and Garment Sector

KnE Social Sciences / The 3rd International Conference on Business, Economics, and Sustainability Science (BESS 2023) / Pages 266–285

Abstract

This research aims to determine the impact of institutional ownership, managerial ownership, independent commissioners, audit committees, and firm size on the financial performance of textile and garment industry sub-sector companies within the period of 2016 to 2021. By adopting an explanatory research approach, the study focuses on a population of textile and garment sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange, a total of 21 companies, selected through purposive sampling. Multiple linear regression analysis was employed as the analytical method. The findings indicate that institutional and managerial ownership does not significantly impact the financial performance of the examined companies. However, independent commissioners, active audit committees, and firm size significantly influence financial performance, supporting the critical role of these corporate governance mechanisms and firm characteristics in shaping financial outcomes within the Indonesian textile and garment sector. The study contributes to understanding the complex relationship between corporate governance mechanisms, firm characteristics, and financial performance. Future research should consider expanding the sample size and exploring other variables influencing financial performance in the textile and garment industry. Furthermore, investigating the mediating or moderating effects of other contextual factors or industry-specific characteristics could provide deeper insights into the observed relationships.


Keywords: audit committee, firm size, good corporate governance, independent commissioner, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, ROE

References
[1] Jensen MC. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Am Econ Rev. 1986;76(2):323–9.

[2] Fitria N. The Effect of Managerial Ownership. Institutional Ownership and Independent Board of Commissioners on Return on Assets; 2019.

[3] Dirman, A., Wahyuni, P.D., Umam, D.C., & ., H. (2020). Analysis of the Effect of Institutional Ownership, Independent Commissioners, Dividend Policy, Debt Policy, and Company Size on Firm Value. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 9.

[4] Jensen MC, Meckling WH. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J Financ Econ. 1976;3(4):305–60.

[5] Hossain MI. Effects of capital structure and managerial ownership on profitability: experience from Bangladesh. Int J Bus Manage. 2016;11(9):218–29.

[6] Sakawa H, Watanabel N. Institutional Ownership and Firm Performance under Stakeholder-Oriented Corporate Governance. Sustainability (Basel). 2020;12(3):1021.

[7] Wiranata YA, Nugrahanti YW. (2013). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Profitabilitas Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, Vol. 15, No. 1, Hal.15-26.

[8] Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. S. (2001). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8161.

[9] Love, I., & Rachinsky, A. (2015). Corporate governance and bank performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Russia and Ukraine. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(sup2), S101-S121.

[10] Ongore, V. O., K’OBONYO, P. O., Ogutu, M., & Bosire, E. M. Board composition and financial performance: empirical analysis of companies listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. 2015;5(1):23–43.

[11] Utama CA, Utama S. Board of commissioners in corporate governance, firm performance, and ownership structure. International Research Journal of Business Studies. 2019;12(2):111–36.

[12] Obradovich J, Gill A. The Impact of Corporate Governance and Financial Leverage on the Value of American Firms. Int Res J Finance Econ. 2012;(91):1–14.

[13] Almarayeh, T., Abdullatif, M., & Aibar-Guzmán, B. (2022). The role of audit committees in mitigating earnings management: evidence from Jordan. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-09-2020-0235.

[14] Olawale LS, Ilo BM, Lawal FK. The effect of firm size on the performance of firms in Nigeria. Aestimatio: the IEB International. J Finance. 2017;(15):68–87.

[15] Dewi PP, Tenaya AI. The Effect of GCG Implementation and Company Size on Banking Financial Performance on the IDX for the 2013-2016 Period. Udayana University Accounting E-Journal. 2017;21(1):310–29.

[16] Purba JT, Africa LA. The effect of capital structure, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, and profitability on company value in manufacturing companies. The Indonesian Accounting Review. 2019;9(1):27–38.

[17] Bhattacharya PS, Graham M. (2007). Institutional ownership and firm performance: Evidence from Finland. Available at SSRN 1000092.

[18] Duggal R, Millar JA. Institutional ownership and firm performance: the case of bidder returns. J Corp Finance. 1999;5(2):103–17.

[19] Healy, J. (2003). Corporate governance & shareholder value: Challenges facing New Zealand. Palmerton North: Dunmore.

[20] Lin YR, Fu XM. Does institutional ownership influence firm performance? Evidence from China. Int Rev Econ Finance. 2017;49(C):17–57.

[21] Tertius MA, Christiawan YJ. The Effect of Good Corporate Governance on Company Performance in the Financial Sector (Indonesian). Majalah Ilmiah Informatika. 2015;3(2):47–60.

[22] Bathala CT, Rao RP. The determinants of board composition: an agency theory perspective. MDE Manage Decis Econ. 1995;16(1):59–69.

[23] Tjager IN. Corporate governance: Tantangan dan kesempatan bagi komunitas bisnis Indonesia. Prenhallindo; 2003.

[24] Widagdo, D. O. K., & Chariri, A. (2014). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 307-315.

[25] Kallamu BS, Saat NA. Audit committee attributes and firm performance: evidence from Malaysian finance companies. Asian Rev Account. 2015;23(3):206–31.

[26] Zraiq M, Fadzil F. The impact of audit committee characteristics on firm performance: evidence from Jordan. Scholar Journal of Applied Sciences and Research. 2018;1(5):39–42.

[27] Hermuningsih S, Kusuma H, Cahyarifida RA. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study from Indonesian Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business. 2020;7(11):827–34.

[28] Shleifer A, Vishny RW. A survey of corporate governance. J Finance. 1997;52(2):737– 83.

[29] Tambalean FA, Manossoh H, Runtu T. Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial Dan Kepemilikan Institusional Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Pada Perusahaan Sektor Industri Barang Konsumsi Di BEI. Going Concern : Jurnal Riset Akuntansi. 2018;14(1):465–73.

[30] Gillan SL, Starks LT. Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: the role of institutional investors. J Financ Econ. 2000;57(2):275–305.

[31] Doğan M. Does firm size affect the firm profitability? Evidence from Turkey. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting. 2013;4(4):53–9.

[32] Yuslirizal A. Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kepemilikan Institusional, Growth, Likuiditas Dan Size Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Pada Industri Tekstil Dan Garmen Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Katalogis. 2017;5(3):116–26.

[33] Duy NT, Phuoc NP. The relationship between firm sizes and stock returns of the service sector in ho chi minh city stock exchange. Rev Eur Stud. 2016;8(4):210.

[34] IBP. J. (2023). Indonesian textile industry faces new threat as thrifting gains popularity. Indonesian Business Post.https://indonesiabusinesspost.com/risksopportunities/ indonesian-textile-industry-faces-new-threat-as-thrifting-gainspopularity/

[35] Estiasih SP, Yuniarsih N, Wajdi MB. The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Managerial Ownership and Firm Size on Firm Value in Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change. 2019;9(9):159– 71.

[36] Intia LC, Azizah SN. Pengaruh Dewan Direksi, Dewan Komisaris Independen, Dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Keuangan Dan Akuntansi. 2021;7(2):46–59.

[37] Kemenperin (2021) Mendorong Kinerja Industri Tekstil dan Produk Tekstil di Tengan Pandemi, III ed. Pusdatin Kemenperin.

[38] Mentalita, H. (2022). Pengaruh Likuiditas dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi, Manajemen dan Ekonomi Digital, 2(4), 45-51.

[39] Ayuningtyas D. (2019). Duh! Emiten Tekstil Terpukul & Harga Saham Anjlok. CNBC Indonesia.https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20191003123029- 17-104139/duh-emiten-tekstil-terpukul-harga-saham-anjlok