Are Indonesian Teachers Ready to Face Disruptive Learning? A Case Study from Economic Teachers in East Java
Abstract
The readiness of teachers facing the learning era must be investigated because teachers must be creative to improve student’s learning experiences. Using the TPACK framework, there is a complex relationship between teachers’ knowledge of technology, pedagogy, and content which in the research focuses on economics knowledge. Thus, this study has three objectives. First, to determine the ability, knowing their capacity in age and gender of high school/vocational teachers in East Java. The data were collected from 189 teachers in high schools/vocational in East Java. The collected data were analyzed using a descriptive quantitative method. The main findings revealed that 90% of teachers had high mastery of technology knowledge, nearly a 100% of teachers had high pedagogical competence, and the majority had moderate economics knowledge. Furthermore, based on gender and age, no significant difference was observed in technological knowledge, pedagogy competence, and economics knowledge in East Java high schools/vocational teachers.
Keywords: learning, pedagogy, teacher, technology
References
[1] Atiah N. Pembelajaran Era Disruptif Menuju Masyarakat 5.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang; 2020.
[2] Baran E, Chuang HH, Thompson A. TPACK: An Emerging Research and Development Tool for Teacher Educators. Turk Online J Educ Technol. 2011;10(4).
[3] Budi MH. Korelasi antara Usia Guru dengan Kompetensi Kepribadian di MTs Negeri Babadan Pangkar Ngawi Tahun 2014/2015. UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang; 2015.
[4] Candra PN, Soepriyanto Y, Praherdhiono H. Pedagogical Knowledge (PK) Guru dalam Pengembangan dan Implementasi Rencana Pembelajaran. Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan. 2020;3(2):166–77.
[5] Chai CS. A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. J Educ Technol Soc. 2013.
[6] Cox S, Graham CR. Diagramming TPACK in Practice: Using and elaborate model of the TPACK Framework to Analyze and Depict Teacher Knowledge. TechTrends. 2009;53(2):60–9.
[7] Gunawan R. Analisis Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) pada Guru Ekonomi di Kota Cirebon. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia; 2018.
[8] Handhini LS, Fitriyanti E. Tantangan Menjadi Guru di Era Disruptif. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang; 2020.
[9] Harris JB, Hofer MJ. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technologyrelated instructional planning. J Res Technol Educ. 2014;43(3):211–29.
[10] Hidayati, N., Setyosari, P., & Soepriyanto, Y. (2018). Kompetensi Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Guru Soshum Setingkat SMA. JKTP, 1(4).
[11] Igwebuike T, Okandeji CO, Onwuegbu OC. Interactive influence of experience, qualification, adn gender on elementary school teachers’ attitudes towards external supervision of instruction. International Journal of Research Studies in Education. 2013;2(3):3–13.
[12] Kasali R. Tak Ada yang Tak Bisa Diubah Sebelum Dihadapi, Motivasi Saja Tidak Cukup. Gramedia Pustaka Utama; 2017.
[13] Koehler M, Mishra P. What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemp Issues Technol Teach Educ. 2009;9(1):60–70.
[14] Muliawaty L. Peluang dan Tantangan Sumber Daya Manusia di Era Disrupsi. Kebijakan: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi. 2019;19(1):1–9.
[15] Murat A. Gender and experience as predictor of biology teacher education process self-efficacy perception and perception of responsibility from student success. Int J New Trends Educ Their Implic. 2013;4(3).
[16] Ohoitimur, J. (2018). Disrupsi: Tantangan bagi Perkembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Peluang bagi Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi. Respons, 23(2).
[17] Pereira RQ, Nasu VH, Nganga CS, Nogueira DR. (2018). TPACK and business education: A review of literature (2008 - 20170. XVIII USP International Conference in Accounting. Pratiwi, N. W. (2016). Kompetensi Guru SMA Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin, Usia, Pengalaman Mengajar, dan Tingkat Pendidikan. Universitas Sanata Dharma.
[18] Purnamasari, D., Firdaus, R. A., & Akuba, S. F. (2020). Pengaruh Usia dan Tingkat Pendidikan terhadap Hasil Kinerja Guru berdasarkan Nilai Ujian Nasional Siswa. Islamic Education Management, 5(2).
[19] Rahmawati NH. (2019). Profesionalisme Guru di Era Teknologi Disrupsi. ISOLEC Proceedings.
[20] Retnaningsih, D. (2019). Tantangan dan Strategi Guru di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional: Kebijakan Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0.
[21] Rosalia Y. Pengaruh Jenis Kelamin terhadap Hubungan Antara Persepsi Mahasiswa tentang Profesi Guru. Universitas Sanata Dharma; 2007.
[22] Rusdiyah EF. Teknologi Pembelajaran: Implementasi Pembelajaran Era 4.0. UIN Sunan Ampel Press; 2019.
[23] Santos JM, Castro RD. Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST). Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2021;3(1):3.
[24] Schmidt DA, Baran E, Thompson AD, Mishra P, Koehler MJ, Shin TS. Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. J Res Technol Educ. 2009;42(2):123– 49.
[25] Syah MF. Pengalaman, Jenis Kelamin, dan Tingkat Pendidikan: Apakah Mempengaruhi Kinerja Guru Ekonomi/Akuntansi di Kabupaten Semarang, Kota Salatiga, dan Kota Semarang. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan; 2016.
[26] Tuomi I. The future of learning in the knowledge society: Disruptive changes for Europe by 2020. Background Paper Prepared for DG JRC/IPTS and DG EAC; 2005.