Local Wisdom in Agriculture of Urug Indigenous Village as an Alternative Biology Learning Resource
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to identify and analyze local wisdom in the field of agriculture in Urug Traditional Village, which can be used as an alternative source of learning biology. This research was conducted from December 2021 to September 2022. This research is qualitative research with descriptive qualitative method. This research data collection technique included conducting observations, interviews, documentation studies, and product feasibility tests to several informants. The results show that local wisdom in the agricultural sector of Kampung Adat Urug can be used as a source for learning biology. The biology material in the local wisdom of the agricultural area of Kampung Adat Urug covers KD 3.1 and KD 4.1 topics related to biology, KD 3.2 and KD 4.2 topics related to biodiversity, and KD 3.11 and KD 4.11 topics related to ecosystems for grade 10 students. For grade 12 students, the material covers KD 3.1 and KD 4.1 topics related to growth and development. Future research should aim to develop teaching materials and learning media for biology based on the local wisdom of the Urug Traditional Village, combined with a diversified learning model.
Keywords: urug indigenous village, local wisdom, biology learning resources
References
[1] White B, Graham C, Savitri L. Agrarian movements and rural populism in Indonesia. J Agrar Change. 2023;23(1):68–84.
[2] McLaren P, Jaramillo NE. “Critical Pedagogy, Latino/a Education, and the Politics of Class Struggle.,” Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies. vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 73–93, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708605282815.
[3] Bahagia B, Hudayana B, Wibowo R, Anna Z. “Local Wisdom to Overcome Covid- 19 Pandemic of Urug and Cipatat Kolot Societies in Bogor, West Java, Indonesia.,” Forum Geografi. vol. 34, no. 2, p. 2020. https://doi.org/10.23917/forgeo.v34i2.12366.
[4] L M, i B; M. L and B. I. A Personally Oriented Approach To Learning A Foreign Language In A Multicultural Environment Of An Educational. Scientific Bulletin Melitopol State Pedagogica. 2023;1(28):75–82.
[5] Zajda J. “Multicultural Education Globally for Democracy, Equality, and Social Justice.,” Presented at the (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22852-0_3.
[6] Kundariati M, Maghfiroh L, Indriwati SE, Rohman F, Priambodo B. Revealing the effect of local-based teaching materials toward scientific reasoning, argumentation, and problem-solving in biology classroom [ Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia]. JPBI. 2022;8(3):287–95.
[7] Suero Montero C, Oliveira Leite L. Towards Local Community Involvement in Students’ Science Learning: Perspectives of Students and Teachers. Journal of Teaching and Learning. 2022;16(3):21–43.
[8] Hastuti SP, Krave AS, Fuka DE, Priyayi DF. “Local Excellence-Based Education that has Character in the Study of Biodiversity and Its Conservation Efforts.,” In: Proceedings of the 2nd Educational Sciences International Conference (ESIC 2019). Atlantis Press, Paris, France (2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200417.014.
[9] Lin Y, Wang Y, Lv X, Yue S, Liu H, Li G, et al. How to Improve the Benefits of Short- Term Fallow on Soil Physicochemical and Microbial Properties: A Case Study from the Yellow River Delta. Land (Basel). 2023;12(7):1426.
[10] Williams A, Kay P, Stirling G, Weng X, Bell L. Impacts of reducing fallow periods on indicators of soil function in subtropical dryland farming systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2022;324:107727.
[11] Yermolik VB, Smirnov PN. Fallow Land Is A Valuable Biotechnical Resource In Creating Large Forage Territories For Wild Cloven-Hoofed Mammals In State Natural Reserves. Innovations and Food Safety. 2022;(3):60–71.
[12] Zhang W, Zhao B, Zhou L, Wang J, Qiu C, Niu K, et al. Harvester Maintenance Resource Scheduling Optimization, Based on the Combine Harvester Operation and Maintenance Platform. Agriculture. 2022;12(9):1433.
[13] Fathurohmah A, Prasetyo DA. Shifting the use of Leuit in agricultural systems. Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences. 2020;12(2):85.
[14] Yulia R, Prakarsa A, Fauzi A. “Leuit Baduy: A Food Security in Baduy Customary Law.,” MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan. vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 265–273, 2018.
[15] Ambayoen MA, Kusuma BA, Pratiwi RE. Communication Strategy of Kasepuhan Sinar Resmi Community in Maintaining Local Varieties for Strengthening Leuit (Village Barns). Agricultural Social Economic Journal. 2018;18(1):30–6.
[16] Jaacks LM, Bliznashka L, Craig P, Eddleston M, Gathorne-Hardy A, Kumar R, et al. Co-Benefits of Largescale Organic farming On huMan health (BLOOM): protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled evaluation of the Andhra Pradesh Communitymanaged Natural Farming programme in India. PLoS One. 2023 Mar;18(3):e0281677.
[17] Mfarrej MF, Rara FM. Competitive, Sustainable Natural Pesticides. Acta Ecol Sin. 2019;39(2):145–51.
[18] Cavoski I, Caboni P, Miano T. “Natural Pesticides and Future Perspectives.,” In: Pesticides in the Modern World - Pesticides Use and Management. InTech (2011). https://doi.org/10.5772/17550.
[19] Härtig H, Nordine JC, Neumann K. Contextualization in the Assessment of Students’ Learning About Science. International Perspectives on the Contextualization of Science Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 113–44.
[20] Tala S, Vesterinen VM. Nature of Science Contextualized: Studying Nature of Science with Scientists. Sci Educ. 2015;24(4):435–57.
[21] Guitton MJ. The importance of studying the dark side of social networks. Comput Human Behav. 2014;31:355.
[22] D’Ovidio C, Rosato E, Carnevale A. An unusual case of murder-suicide: the importance of studying knots. J Forensic Leg Med. 2017 Jan;45:17–20.
[23] Stuch B, Alcamo J. “Systems methods for analyzing trade-offs between food security and conserving biodiversity.,” Environment Systems and Decisions. p. 2023.
[24] Muluneh MG. Impact of climate change on biodiversity and food security: a global perspective—a review article. Agric Food Secur. 2021;10(1):36.
[25] Jacob MC, Chaves VM, Rocha C. “Biodiversity Towards Sustainable Food Systems: Four Arguments.,” Presented at the (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69139- 4_1.
[26] Hanifah AI; Ayu Ismi Hanifah. Utilization of Mind Mapping to Increase Learning Creativity. Cakrawala: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global. 2023;2(1):74–8.
[27] Ayu Maharrany A. Tukiran, and S. Kuntjoro, “Profile of Mind Mapping Utilization in Learning During 2018-2022.,”. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research. 2022;3(3):288–300.
[28] Fereres E, Villalobos FJ. Agriculture and Agricultural Systems. Principles of Agronomy for Sustainable Agriculture. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 1–12.
[29] Cárdenas ML, Wilde V, Hagen-Zanker A, Seifert-Dähnn I, Hutchins MG, Loiselle S. The Circular Benefits of Participation in Nature-Based Solutions. Sustainability (Basel). 2021;13(8):4344.
[30] Wati IK, Nugraheni FS, Sari MW, Suciati A. Widyastuti, and K. Kamaliah, “Local wisdom-based science learning to improve creative thinking: A systematic review.,” Presented at the (2023).