Wetland-use Change on Ecological Impact: A Topic-based Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

This study employs a bibliometric approach to analyze the global trends in wetlanduse change research published in the Scopus database between 2003 and 2023. Over 396 articles were examined, revealing a staggering sixfold increase in annual publications and a ninefold surge in citations during this period. The USA dominated global research output, followed by Canada and the UK. Moreover, international collaboration showed remarkable growth. Keyword analysis highlighted “water” as a central theme, appearing amongst the top keywords in various categories. Notably, “constructed wetland biodiversity” emerged as a burgeoning research area. This analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of title, author keyword, and keyword plus approaches for mapping the landscape of wetland research. These findings suggest an increasingly vibrant and collaborative field, with water quality and constructed wetland biodiversity demanding particular attention. Moving forward, addressing critical research gaps in areas like climate change impacts and effective wetland management practices will be crucial for the sustainable future of these vital ecosystems.


Keywords: bibliometric analysis, ecological impact, wetland-use

References
[1] Mitsch WJ. What is ecological engineering? Ecol Eng. 2012;45:5–12.

[2] Balwan WK, Kour S. Wetland- An Ecological Boon for the Environment. East African Scholars Journal of Agriculture and Life Sciences. 2021;4(3):38–48.

[3] Suhani I, Monika B. Vaish, P. Singh, and R.P. Singh, “Restoration, Construction, and Conservation of Degrading Wetlands: A Step Toward Sustainable Management Practices.,” In: Restoration of Wetland Ecosystem: A Trajectory Towards a Sustainable Environment. pp. 1–16. Springer Singapore (2020).

[4] D.A. Hammer, B.R. London N E W York, and W. Ashington, Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatm ent Municipal, Industrial, and Agricultural A CRC Press C om pany., 1989.

[5] Drayer AN, Richter SC. Physical wetland characteristics influence amphibian community composition differently in constructed wetlands and natural wetlands. Ecol Eng. 2016;93:166–74.

[6] Patyal V, Jaspal D, Khare K. “Materials in Constructed Wetlands for wastewater remediation: A review.,” p. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1648.

[7] Reddy KR, DeLaune RD, Inglett PW. Biogeochemistry of Wetlands: Science and Applications Second Edition., 2023.

[8] R. Yang, Y. Chen, Y. Qiu, et al., “Assessing the Landscape Ecological Health (LEH) of Wetlands: Research Content and Evaluation Methods (2000–2022),” (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132410.

[9] Xu X, Chen M, Yang G, Jiang B, Zhang J. Wetland ecosystem services research. Crit Rev. 2020.

[10] M.P. Mueller, D.J. Tippins, D. Greenwood, et al., Environmental Discourses in Science Education Volume 4., 2020.

[11] Y. Fenetahun, W. Yong-Dong, Y. You, and X. Xinwen, “Dynamics of forage and land cover changes in Teltele district of Borana rangelands, southern Ethiopia: Using geospatial and field survey data,” (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00320- 8.

[12] Fu J, Zhang Q, Wang P, Zhang L, Tian Y, Li X. “Spatio-Temporal Changes in Ecosystem Service Value and Its Coordinated Development with Economy: A Case Study in Hainan Province, China.,” Remote Sensing. vol. 14, no. 4, p. 2022.

[13] Hobbs NT, Galvin KA, Stokes CJ, Lackett JM, Ash AJ, Boone RB, et al. Fragmentation of rangelands: implications for humans, animals, and landscapes. Glob Environ Change. 2008;18(4):776–85.

[14] Regasa MS, Nones M, Adeba D. “A review on land use and land cover change in ethiopian basins.,” Land. vol. 10, no. 6, p. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060585.

[15] K.K. McLauchlan, P.E. Higuera, J. Miesel, et al., “Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers,” (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/1365- 2745.13403.

[16] E.L. Frisk, Y. Volchko, O.T. Sandström, et al., “The geosystem services concept – What is it and can it support subsurface planning?,” (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101493.

[17] R.J. Lazarus, The Making of Environmental Law., 2004. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470641.001.0001.

[18] I.B. Lourenço, L.F. Guimar aes, M.B. Alves, and M.G. Miguez, “Land as a sustainable resource in city planning: The use of open spaces and drainage systems to structure environmental and urban needs.,” Journal of Cleaner Production. vol. 276, p. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123096.

[19] Mitsch WJ, Jørgensen SE. Ecological engineering: A field whose time has come. Ecological Engineering. Elsevier; 2003. pp. 363–77.

[20] Wada Y, Van Beek LP, Bierkens MF. Modelling global water stress of the recent past: on the relative importance of trends in water demand and climate variability. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2011;15(12):3785–808.

[21] Zuo Q, Zhou Y, Wang L, Li Q, Liu J. “Impacts of future land use changes on land use conflicts based on multiple scenarios in the central mountain region, China.,” Ecological Indicators. vol. 137, p. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108743.

[22] Qiu H, Hu B, Zhang Z. “Impacts of land use change on ecosystem service value based on SDGs report–Taking Guangxi as an example.,” Ecological Indicators. vol. 133, p. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108366.

[23] Gaglio M, Aschonitis VG, Gissi E, Castaldelli G, Fano EA. Land use change effects on ecosystem services of river deltas and coastal wetlands: case study in Volano– Mesola–Goro in Po river delta (Italy). Wetlands Ecol Manage. 2017;25(1):67–86.

[24] S. Goyal, S. Chauhan, and P. Mishra, “Circular economy research: A bibliometric analysis (2000–2019) and future research insights.,” Journal of Cleaner Production. vol. 287, p. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125011.

[25] M.K. Linnenluecke, M. Marrone, and A.K. Singh, “Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses,” (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678.

[26] Q. Wang and E.W.T. Ngai, “Event study methodology in business research: a bibliometric analysis,” (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-12-2019-0671.

[27] F.R. Scarano, “Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change: concept, scalability and a role for conservation science,” (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.05.003.

[28] Jing X, Zhuo Y, Xu Z, Chen Y, Li G, Wang X. “Coastal Wetland Restoration Strategies Based on Ecosystem Service Changes: A Case Study of the South Bank of Hangzhou Bay.,” Land. vol. 12, no. 5, p. 2023.

[29] Newig J, Fritsch O. Environmental governance: Participatory, multi-level - And effective? Environ Policy Gov. 2009;19(3):197–214.

[30] Hariram NP, Mekha KB, Suganthan V, Sudhakar K. “Sustainalism: An Integrated Socio-Economic-Environmental Model to Address Sustainable Development and Sustainability.,” Sustainability (Switzerland). vol. 15, no. 13, p. 2023.