Improving Mathematical Problem-Solving Abilities through Think Pair Share Learning Using Autograph
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i8.15583Abstract
There are many studies on technology-supported learning based on cooperative learning in the literature. However, little is known about Autograph-assisted think pair share learning in supporting students’ problem-solving abilities for learning in today’s technological era. This study aims to examine and analyze the differences in the improvement of students’ problem-solving abilities who participate in think pair share learning assisted by Autograph (Auto-TPS) and conventional learning assisted by Autograph (Auto-CL). This study uses quantitative methods with the design used in this study is a nonequivalent control group design involving two groups of students. The sample of this study was 70 students of class IX SMP Al Ulum Medan, Indonesia. Questions to test students’ mathematical problem-solving skills found five items. Data analysis includes data processing of test results, namely normality test, homogeneity test, hypothesis testing, and average difference test in the two groups using t-test. The conclusion of this study is that students who study with Auto-TPS get a higher increase in problem-solving abilities compared to students who learn with Auto-CL, with the explanation that the group of students who study Auto-TPS is very good when compared to the group student learning Auto-CL. Research findings related to the application of Auto-TPS can be an alternative learning model in the current technology-era learning situation.
Keywords: autograph, mathematics, problem-solving abilities, think pair share learning
References
Nguyen M, Chang A, Micciche E, Meshulam M, Nastase SA, Hasson U. Teacherstudent neural coupling during teaching and learning. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2022 Apr;17(4):367–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab103
Troutman AP, Lichtenberg BK. Mathematics: A good beginning strategies for teaching children. 2nd ed. California: Cole Publishing Company; 1982.
Bahl HC, Hunt RG. Problem-solving strategies for DSS design. Inf Manage. 1985;8(2):81–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(85)90036-9
Benmesbah O, Lamia M, Hafidi M. An enhanced genetic algorithm for solving learning path adaptation problem. Educ Inf Technol. 2021;26(5):5237–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10509-z
Althuizen N, Wierenga B. Supporting creative problem solving with a case-based reasoning system. J Manage Inf Syst. 2014;31(1):309–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222310112
Arifin MB, Sholeh M, Hafiz A, Agustin RD, Wardana MD. Developing interactive mobile mathematics inquiry to enhance students’ problem-solving skill [iJIM]. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 2021;15(01):24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i01.20067
Becker DF, Forsyth RA. Chapter 5 Gender differences in mathematics problem solving and science: A longitudinal analysis. Int J Educ Res. 1994;21(4):407–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(06)80029-7
Cai J. A protocol-analytic study of metacognition in mathematical problem solving. Math Educ Res J. 1994;6(2):166–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217270
Chen YW, Chang WH, Kuo CC. A comparative study of the divergent problem solving abilities of mathematically and scientifically talented students and nongifted students. Think Skills Creativity. 2016;22:247–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.009
Irma A, Juandi D, Dahlan JA, Nirawati R. The effect of think-pair-share cooperative learning on student mathematical communication skills. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1521(3):032033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032033
Cooper F. A modification of think pair share to make it more learner-centered by using student-generated questions. Coll Teach. 2018;66(1):34–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2017.1390438
Flora P, Raja P, Mahpul. Raja, and Mahpul, “Discovery learning strategy: integrating think-pair-share and teacher’s corrective feedback to enhance students’ writing language accuracy,”. International Journal of Education and Practice. 2020;8(4):733– 45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2020.84.733.745
Mundelsee L, Jurkowski S. Think and pair before share: effects of collaboration on students’ in-class participation. Learn Individ Differ. 2021;88:102015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102015
Wong D. Active learning in osteopathic education: evaluation of think-pair-share in an undergraduate pathology unit. Int J Osteopath Med. 2022;43:63–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2021.12.001
Ningsih Y, Andika R, Sari IK, Ahmad S, Kenedi AK. The application think pair share in learning mathematic. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1321(2):022092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/2/022092
Kurjum M, Muhid A, Thohir M. Think-pair-share model as solution to develop students’ critical thinking in islamic studies: is it effective? Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan. 2020;39(1):144–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i1.28762
Muiawan W. Effectiveness of biology learning using cooperative learning methods type TPS (think, pair, share) against student achievement. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1539(1):012051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1539/1/012051
Baya’a N, Daher W. Mathematics Teachers’ Readiness to Integrate ICT in the Classroom: The Case of Elementary and Middle School Arab Teachers in Israel [iJET]. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2013;8(1):46–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v8i1.2386
Kozlov A, Tamer O, Bondarovskaya L, Lapteva S. Improving the project risk competence using m-learning: A case of bachelors in technical fields [iJIM]. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 2020;14(21):107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i21.18443
Oyelere SS, Suhonen J, Sutinen E. M-Learning: A new paradigm of learning ICT in Nigeria [iJIM]. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 2016;10(1):35– 44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v10i1.4872
A.L. Goodwin, E.L. Low, P.T. Ng, A. Yeung, and L. Cai, “Enhancing playful teachers’ perception of the importance of ICT use in the classroom: The role of risk taking as a mediator,.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education. vol. 40, no. 40, p. 2015. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n4.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n4.8
Tran T, Phan HA, Van Le H, Nguyen HT. ICT integration in developing competence for pre- service mathematics teachers: A case study from six universities in Vietnam [iJET]. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2020;15(14):19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i14.14015
Aigerim B, Aida S, Tulebike K. Investigating of information and communication technology (ICT) skills and professionally-based competencies of translator candidates. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. 2022;10(4):894–917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2647
Maharaj-Sharma R, Sharma A, Sharma A. Using ICT-based instructional technologies to teach science: perspectives from teachers in Trinidad and Tobago. Aust J Teach Educ. 2017;42(10):23–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n10.2
Galustyan OV, Vyunova NI, Komarova EP, Shusharina ES, Gamisonija SS, Sklyarova ON. Formation of media competence of future teachers by means of ICT and mobile technologies [iJIM]. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 2019;13(11):184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i11.11350
Saha J, Ahmmed S, Ali M, Tamal MA, Rezaul KM. ICT based mathematics skill development program: an initiative to overcome mathematics anxiety [iJET]. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2020;15(14):252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i14.14149
Ridha M, Johar R, Marwan, Mailizar. R. Johar, Marwan, and Mailizar, “The effectiveness of an autograph-assisted problem based learning model for improving high school students’ learning outcome on graphics functions,”. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;1088:012025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012025
Zubainur CM, Suhartati, Iwannitona. C.M. Zubainur, Suhartati, and Iwannitona, “The practicality of the quadratic function module by utilizing autograph software and angry birds game.,”. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;1088:012042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012042
Ticaya M, Ikhsan M, Yusrizal. Ikhsan, and Yusrizal, “Students’ learning outcome through the implementation of guided inquiry learning model using Autograph,”. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1460(1):012043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012043
Kristianti Y, Prabawanto S, Suhendra S. Critical thinking skills of students through mathematics learning with ASSURE model assisted by software autograph. J Phys Conf Ser. 2017;895:012063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012063
Creswell J. Educational research planning, implementation, and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar; 2015.
Darmadi H. Educational research methods. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2011.
Drew CJ, Hardman ML, Hosp JL. Educational research: Designing and carrying out research in the field of education. Jakarta: Permata Puri Media; 2017.
Defranco-tommarello J, Deek FP. Collaborative problem solving and groupware for software development. Inf Syst Manage. 2006;21(1):67–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/1078/43877.21.1.20041201/78987.7
Werdiningsih I, Budiyono, Pratiwi H. Budiyono, and H. Pratiwi, “Think pair share (TPS) model using science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) approach in mathematics learning.,”. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1306(1):012024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1306/1/012024
Druva-Roush CA. Chapter 4 Gender differences in comprehension skills used in mathematical problem-solving by math-anxious and non-math-anxious students. Int J Educ Res. 1994;21(4):399–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(06)80028-5
Shih YC, Reynolds BL. Teaching adolescents EFL by integrating Think-Pair-Share and Reading strategy instruction: A quasi-experimental study. RELC J. 2015;46(3):221–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688215589886
