Enhancing Scientific Argumentation Skills Through Electronic Worksheets Based on Research Oriented Collaborative Inquiry Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i8.15505Abstract
This study aimed to develop and determine the feasibility of an electronic worksheet based on Research Oriented Collaborative Inquiry Learning in a course on chemical equilibrium. The development model of this research was Research and Development. It follows the 4D model by Thiagarajan. The 4D development model consists of four research and development steps: define, design, develop and disseminate. The instruments in this study were questionnaires used to obtain input data for products and quantitative scores as the value of media feasibility. The results showed that the components of the e-worksheet on the aspects of the materials, learning, visual display, and software engineering were suitable for use by students. The percentage of assessment by chemistry teachers was 92.50%, peer reviewers were 90%, and students’ rating was 87%. Therefore, the electronic worksheet based on Research Oriented Collaborative Inquiry Learning (REORCILEA) is worthy of being used as a learning medium in the course on chemical equilibrium to improve scientific argumentation skills. The electronic worksheet has the advantage of being more practical and effective in learning.
Keywords: electronic worksheet, collaborative inquiry learning, chemical equilibrium
References
Seruni R, Munawaroh S, Kurniadewi F, Nurjayadi M. Implementation of e-module flip PDF professional to improve students’ critical thinking skills through problem based learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1521/4/042085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042085
Leow FT, Neo M. Redesigning for collaborative learning environment: study on students’ perception and interaction in web 2.0 tools. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;176:186–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.460
Serth S, Teusner R, Renz J, Uflacker M. Evaluating digital worksheets with interactive programming exercises for K-12 education. 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028680
Ramlawati R, Liliasari L, Martoprawiro MA, Wulan AR. The effect of electronic portfolio assessment model to increase of students’ generic science skills in practical inorganic chemistry [EduLearn]. Journal of Education and Learning. 2014;8(3):179– 86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v8i3.260
Yuni E, Ernawati MD, Malik A. Pengembangan lembar kerja peserta didik elektronik berbasis proyek pada materi termokimia di kelas xi SMA. Journal of The Indonesian Society of Integrated Chemistry. 2018;10(1):6–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/jisic.v10i1.5306
Heng LL, Surif J, Seng CH. Malaysian students’ scientific argumentation: do groups perform better than individuals? Int J Sci Educ. 2015;37(3):505–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.995147
Jönsson A. Student performance on argumentation task in the swedish national assessment in science. Int J Sci Educ. 2016;38(11):1825–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1218567
Deng Y, Wang H. Research on evaluation of Chinese students’ competence in written scientific argumentation in the context of chemistry. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2017;18(1):127–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00076B
Özdem Yilmaz Y, Cakiroglu J, Ertepinar H, Erduran S. The pedagogy of argumentation in science education: science teachers’ instructional practices. Int J Sci Educ. 2017;39(11):1443–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1336807
Kaya E. Argumentation Practices in Classroom: pre-service teachers’ conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. Int J Sci Educ. 2013;35(7):1139–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.770935
Sampson V, Blanchard MR. Science teachers and scientific argumentation: trends in views and practice. J Res Sci Teach. 2012;49(9):1122–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21037
Sandoval WA, Enyedy N, Redman EH, Xiao S. Organising a culture of argumentation in elementary science. Int J Sci Educ. 2019;41(13):1848–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1641856
Concannon JP, Brown PL, Lederman NG, Lederman JS. Investigating the development of secondary students’ views about scientific inquiry. Int J Sci Educ. 2020;42(6):906–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1742399
Özkanbaş M, Kırık ÖT. Implementing collaborative inquiry in a middle school science course. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2020;21(4):1199–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00231F
Rohaeti E, Prodjosantoso AK, Irwanto I. Oriented collaborative inquiry learning model: improving students’ scientific attitudes in general chemistry. J Balt Sci Educ. 2020;19(1):108–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.108
Thiagarajan S. “Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook.,” p. 1974.
Dumford AD, Miller AL. Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. J Comput High Educ. 2018;30(3):452–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z
Huang YM, Chiu PS. The effectiveness of the meaningful learning-based evaluation for different achieving students in a ubiquitous learning context. Comput Educ. 2015;87:243–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.06.009
Sriwahyuni I, Risdianto E, Johan H. Pengembangan bahan ajar elektronik menggunakan flip pdf professional pada materi alat-alat optik di sma. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika. 2019;2(3):145–152. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.2.3.145-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.2.3.145-152
Lestari E, Nulhakim L, Suryani DI. Pengembangan e-modul berbasis flip pdf professional tema global warming sebagai sumber belajar mandiri siswa kelas VII. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education. 2022;6(2):338–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.2.338-345
Demircioğlu G, Demircioğlu H, Yadigaroğlu M. An investigation of chemistry student teachers’ understanding of chemical equilibrium. Int J New Trends Educ Their Implic. 2013;4(2):192–9.
Gautam SS, Tiwari MK. Components and benefits of E-learning system [IRJCS]. International Research Journal of Computer Science. 2016;3(1):14–7.
Martínez-Caro E, Cegarra-Navarro JG, Cepeda-Carrión G. An application of the performance-evaluation model for e-learning quality in higher education. Total Qual Manage Bus Excell. 2015;26(5–6):632–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.867607
Chang V. Review and discussion: e-learning for academia and industry. Int J Inf Manage. 2016;36(3):476–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.12.007
Al Rawashdeh AZ, Mohammed EY, Al Arab AR, Alara M, Al-Rawashdeh B, Al- Rawashdeh B. Advantages and disadvantages of using e-learning in university education: analyzing students’ perspectives. Electron J e-Learn. 2021;19(3):107–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.19.3.2168
Nishizawa H, Kimura K, Ohno W, Yoshioka T. Interactive worksheets for connecting symbolic and visual representations of 3D vector equations. Teach Math Its Appl. 2014;33(1):52–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hru005
Henriksen K. “Advances in patient safety: From research to implementation.,” p. 2005.
