Supporting and Inhibiting Factors of Outdoor STEAM Learning in Early Childhood Education
Abstract
Research shows that it’s important for kids to get out and play. By combining outdoor learning and STEAM, it will provide a new perspective on the lesson theme and can connect school content with the real-world problems. However, some things support and hinder outdoor STEAM learning in early childhood education. This study aims to determine the supporting and inhibiting factors of STEAM outdoor learning in early childhood education. The subjects of this research were 34 early childhood education schools in Central Java. This research data is qualitative, collected through observation, documentation, and interviews techniques. The observation technique was used to make direct observations in the field and documented them in the form of videos and photos. Research data management was carried out using the QSR NVivo software. The data analysis technique used was the qualitative data analysis technique from Miles and Huberman which includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. Testing the validity of the data in this research used source triangulation techniques through the cluster analysis and comparison diagram features in the QSR NVivo software. Based on the coding result of the research data using the help of NVivo QSR software, it is known that the biggest supporting factors of outdoor STEAM learning in early childhood education are environment, media, teachers, and infrastructure, while other supporting factors are area, cost, weather, new ideas, new experiences, and situations. The biggest inhibiting factors of outdoor STEAM learning in early childhood education are adaptability, security, and infrastructure, while other inhibiting factors areweather, support; environment, pollution, and situation. The results of this study can be used as a guideline for outdoor STEAM learning in early childhood education and make the inhibiting factors a challenge for teachers to facilitate outdoor learning as a form of maximizing the use of the environment as a learning resource in early childhood education.
Keywords: STEAM, outdoor learning, early childhood education
References
[1] Canadian International School. STEAM education: Gearing students towards the future 2020. https://www.international-schools-database.com/news/steameducation- gearing-students-towards-the-future (accessed April 10, 2023).
[2] U.S. Department of Education. Enhancing such skills lies at the heart of STEM and STEAM education n.d. https://www.ed.gov/stem (accessed May 10, 2023).
[3] Allina B. The development of STEAM educational policy to promote student creativity and social empowerment. Arts Educ Policy Rev. 2018;119(2):77–87. Available from: https://doi.org/DOI:10.1080/10632913.2017.1296392
[4] Monkeviciene O, Autukeviciene B, Kaminskiene L, Monkevicius J. Impact of innovative STEAM education practices on teacher professional development and 3- 6-year-old children’s competence development. Journal of Social Studies Education Research 2020;11.
[5] Mengmeng Z, Xiantong Y, Xinghua W. Construction of STEAM curriculum model and case design in kindergarten. Am J Educ Res. 2019;7(7):485–90.
[6] DeJarnette NK. Implementing STEAM in the early childhood classroom. J STEM Educ. 2018;3(3):18. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/3878
[7] Selly PB. Teaching STEM outdoors: activities for Young Children. Yorkton Court. Redleaf Press; 2017.
[8] Carbonell R, Cortes F, Hasegawa K, Quaimbao J, Elipane L. Algebra in physics: Exploring math-science integration through lesson study. International Conference on Mathematics Education, Seoul, South Korea: 2016.
[9] Clements D, Sarama J. Learning math, science and technology is good for preschoolers. 2017. https://childandfamilyblog.com/?s=Learning+math%2C+ science+and+technology+is+good+for+preschooler
[10] Vargas F, Alvarado H. Virtual laboratories as a strategy for teaching improvement in math sciences and engineering in Bolivia. Int J Eng Educ. 2020;2(1):1–12.
[11] Gonzalez S, Escala M. Education for thinking program with emphasis in math,science and engineering at Fray Ramon Pane School: ongoing educational innovation. Sci Soc. 2016;41:9–28.
[12] Hunter-Doniger T. STEAM education afterschool and summer learning. The STEM Journal. 2019;4(1):1–10.
[13] View Sonic. The importance of the arts in STEAM education 2021. https://www.viewsonic.com/library/education/the-importance-of-the-arts-in-steameducation/#:~: text=STEAM education highlights the arts,also with employment opportunities too. (accessed February 20, 2023).
[14] Riordaina M, Johnstonb J, Walshec G. Making mathematics and science integration happen: key aspects of practice. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2015;27(2):233–55.
[15] Tatar E, Colak H, Lederman N. An integrated science and math activity to teach nature of science. Journal of Science Teaching. 2016;4:94–113.
[16] Voicu CD, Ampartzaki M, Dogan ZY, Kalogiannakis M. STEAM implementation in preschool and primary school education: experiences from six countries. London: Intechopen Publisher; 2022. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.107886.
[17] Alghamdi AA. Exploring early childhood teachers’ beliefs about STEAM education in Saudi Arabia. Early Child Educ J. 2022;51(2):247–56. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01303-0
[18] Norðdahl K, Einarsdóttir J. Children’s views and preferences regarding their outdoor environment. J Adventure Educ Outdoor Learn. 2015;15(2):152–67. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2014.896746
[19] Rönnlund M. Schoolyard stories: processes of gender identity at a ‘childrens place.’. Childhood. 2015;22(1):85–100.
[20] Villanen H, Alerby E. The sense of place – Voices from a schoolyard. Educ North. 2013;20:26–38.
[21] Larsson A, Rönnlund M. The spatial practice of the schoolyard. A comparison between Swedish and French teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of educational outdoor spaces. J Adventure Educ Outdoor Learn. 2021;21(2):139–50.
[22] Jackson K, Bazeley P. Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. 3rd ed. LOndon: SAGE Publications; 2019.
[23] Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook. 4th ed. Arizona: SAGE Publications; 2018.
[24] Kalpogianni DE. Why are the children not outdoors? Factors supporting and hindering outdoor play in Greek public day-care centres. Int J Play. 2019;8(2):155–73.
[25] Oberle E, Zeni M, Munday F, Brussoni M. Support factors and barriers for outdoor learning in elementary schools: A systemic perspective. Am J Health Educ. 2021;52(5):1–15.
[26] Dabaja ZF. Exploring an unfamiliar territory: a study on outdoor education in Lebanon. J Adventure Educ Outdoor Learn. 2023;23(4):379–93.
[27] Homan E. Integrating STEAM learning into your school playground environment 2019. https://www.pentagonplay.co.uk/news-and-info/discover-steam-learningoutdoors (accessed May 20, 2023).
[28] Finn KE, Yan Z, McInnis KJ. Promoting physical activity and science learning in anoutdoor education program. J Phys Educ Recreat Dance. 2018;89(1):35–9. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2017.1390506
[29] Sahrakhiz S, Harring M, Witte MD. Learning opportunities in the outdoor school– empirical findings on outdoor school in Germany from the children’s perspective. J Adventure Educ Outdoor Learn. 2018;18(3):214–26.
[30] Broekhuizen K, Scholten AM, de Vries SI. The value of (pre)school playgrounds for children’s physical activity level: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 May;11(1):59.
[31] Barrett P, Treves A, Shmis T, Ambasz D, Ustinova M. The impact of school infrastructure on learning: a synthesis of the evidence. Washington (D.C.): The World Bank; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1378-8.
[32] Álvarez VI, Llorente AMP. Opportunities and challenges of e-Learning in Spanish institutions of higher education. Challenges and opportunities for the gobal implementation of e-Learning frameworks, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998- 7607-6.ch008..
[33] Padayichie K. The importance of outdoor learning. What are the benefits of outdoor learning for primary school children? n.d. https://www.structural-learning.com/post/outdoor-learning#:~:text=The teacher’s role in supervising,Designing for Learning%2C 2021). (accessed March 15, 2023).
[34] Yuliana. Metode Pembelajaran di Luar Ruangan Kelas (Outdoor Study) n.d. https://aceh.kemenag.go.id/berita/187093/metode-pembelajaran-di-luar-ruangankelas- outdoor-study#:~:text=Peran guru pada pembelajaran outdoor,kreatif%2C dan akrab dengan lingkungaan. (accessed June 1, 2023).
[35] Fernández R, Correal JF, D’Ayala D, Medaglia AL. A decision-making framework for school infrastructure improvement programs. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2023;:1–20.
[36] Nugroho AA, Wibowo UB. The influence of school infrastructure on student learning activeness: a research study. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2019), 2020. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.076.
[37] Martin AJ, Nejad HG, Colmar S, Liem GA. Adaptability: how students’ responses to uncertainty and novelty predict their academic and non-academic outcomes. J Educ Psychol. 2013;105(3):728–46.
[38] Burns EC, Martin AJ, Collie RJ. Adaptability, personal best (PB) goals setting, and gains in students’ academic outcomes: A longitudinal examination from a social cognitive perspective. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2018;53:57–72.
[39] Collie RJ, Martin AJ. Students’ adaptability in mathematics: examining self-reports and teachers’ reports and links with engagement and achievement outcomes. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2017;49:355–66.
[40] Putwain DW, Loderer K, Gallard D, Beaumont J. School-related subjective well-being promotes subsequent adaptability, achievement, and positive behavioural conduct. Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 Mar;90(1):92–108.
[41] Mwoma T, Begi N, Murungi C. Safety and security in preschools: A challenge in informal settlements. Issues Educ Res. 2018;28:720–36.