The Relevance of Non-litigation Mediation in Family Dispute Resolution to Family Law Reform in Indonesia

Abstract

Non-litigation mediation is very important for its application in Indonesian society, given the increasing number of cases of family disputes in religious courts. The research question in this study is to what extent extrajudicial mediation is relevant to family law reform in Indonesia, especially in the case of domestic disputes. The approaches used in this study are legal, normative, and philosophical. The main legal materials were based on the Quran, Hadith, and Laws and Regulations. Data processing was done by creating and organizing data. This was a qualitative analysis, with a focus on non-litigation mediation. The findings show that non-litigation mediation in family disputes has been long established in Indonesian society. Non-litigation mediation for resolving family disputes is very important to include in Indonesia’s legal reform agenda. This is because it has a deep connection with Indonesian society. The values of consensus consultation, fraternity, solidarity, mutual cooperation, and tolerance have always been at the forefront of the community in overcoming the various problems that arise and are an advantage in restructuring the rules of non-litigation mediation. However, their implementation is still not optimal. Non-litigation mediation occupies a very powerful position and is rooted in the legal order of life of the Indonesian people, but its application in resolving family disputes is simply underutilized. And community culture.


Keywords: Non-litigation mediation, family dispute resolution, family law reform

References
[1] Betts RK. Conflict after the Cold War: arguments on causes of war and peace. Routledge; 2021.

[2] Lafont C. Democracy without shortcuts: A participatory conception of deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press; 2019.

[3] Salihu HA. Possibilities for the incorporation of African indigenous procedures and mechanisms of dispute resolution in the administration of criminal justice in Nigeria. Contemporary Justice Review 2020;23:354–72.

[4] Pais A, Costa M. An ideology critique of global citizenship education. Critical Studies in Education 2020;61:1–16.

[5] Chandra T. Non-Litigation Process Land Dispute Settlement for Legal Certainty. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law 2019;2:177–94.

[6] Hidayat E, Mahmudah S. Understanding And Awareness Of Gender Equality In Divorce And Its Contribution To Islamic Family Law Reform In Indonesia. SMART: Journal of Sharia, Traditon, and Modernity 2022;2:59–74.

[7] Crouch C. Post-democracy and populism. The Political Quarterly 2019;90:124–37.

[8] Tahura U. Role of clients, lawyers, judges, and institutions in hiking litigation costs in Bangladesh: An empirical study. Asian Journal of Law and Society 2022;9:59–80.

[9] Araújo MCB, Costa MF. A critical review of the issue of cigarette butt pollution in coastal environments. Environmental Research 2019;172:137–49.

[10] Siregar KI. The Concept of Harmony and Peace in the Hadith. ICHELSS: International Conference on Humanities, Education, Law, and Social Sciences, vol. 2, 2022, p. 667–77.

[11] Mark D. Semantic decomposition of four Quranic words. Russian Journal of Linguistics 2022;26:937–69.

[12] Perelman EA. American evangelists and tuberculosis in modern Japan. Hong Kong University Press; 2020.

[13] Saihu M. Unity In Diversity (Humanism-Theocentric Paradigm Of Social Education In Indonesia). GlobeEdit; 2020.

[14] Hussin N, Tajuddin HHA. An Islamic Perspective on Preventing Sexual Abuse Against Children. IIUMLJ 2021;29:153.

[15] Atmojo AM. Religious Response to Covid-19: A Study of Fiqh Disaster from the Perspective of Islamic-Neuroscience Education. Istawa: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 2022;7:58–70.

[16] Siregar MH. Scheme of Maslahat Within Sharia and Transcendental Fiqh. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 2021;15:35–62.

[17] Asmara G, Atsar A. Application of Maslahat Mursalah Rules in Business Transactions in Islamic Banking. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 2021;24:1–13.

[18] Haq YD, Muchtia H, Mukhlis ZA. Bid’ah in Concept of Maslahah Mursalah and Istihsan According to Imam asy-Syathibi. JURIS ( Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 2021;20:225–37.

[19] Sulthon M. Integration of Islamic sharia in national legal system. JURNAL ILMIAH MIZANI: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi, Dan Keagamaan 2020;7:95–112.

[20] Abd Muin MA, Abdullah S, Che Omar A. The Fiqh Method in Islamic Social Entrepreneurship: An Introduction. Islamic Development Management: Recent Advancements and Issues 2019:225–38.

[21] Auda J. Maqasid al-Shari’ah as Philosophy of Islamic Law. International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT); 2022.

[22] Rumadan I, Salamah U. Settlement Of Divorce Dispute Through The Forum Of Mediation In Judicial Institutions As An Effort Of Legal Protection For The Rights And Interests Of The Child Of Post-Divorce. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran 2021;21:213–26.

[23] Pratama KJ. The Indonesian Legal Paradigm Concept about Tort Law (Analyse Toward Court Decision Number: 42/PDT. G/2014/PN. BYL). Available at SSRN 3500712 2019.

[24] Bell C, Badanjak S. Introducing PA-X: A new peace agreement database and dataset. Journal of Peace Research 2019;56:452–66.

[25] Schmitz A, Rule C. Online dispute resolution for smart contracts. J Disp Resol 2019:103.

[26] Ojo AA. The role and impact of third-party mediator in an organisation in the 21st century nigeria. World Bulletin of Social Sciences 2021;4:151–9.

[27] Soehartono KT, Aldyan A, Indriyani R. The establishing paradigm of dominus litis principle in Indonesian administrative justice. Sriwijaya Law Review 2021;5:42–55.

[28] Kisworo W. A Framework for the Establishment of An Environmental Court in Indonesia: Opportunities and Challenges. Macquarie University 2019.

[29] Aime AF, Ad’ha ZD. Determination Of Legal Remedies For Civil Cases To Make The Principles Of Justice Simple, Fast And Lighting Cost. Jurnal Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial 2021;6:1–9.

[30] Jamal M, Mahfudz AA, Handayani R. Analysis of Alternative Dispute Resolution in non-litigation dispute resolution on Islamic Mortgage: at the Ombudsman Institution Yogyakarta. Journal TSAQAFAH 2021;17:207–28.

[31] Hartanto D. Sociology Review of Social Phenomenon, Social Rules and Social Technology. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCIJournal) Vol 2020;3:1175–84.

[32] Koenig A, Freeman L. Cutting-Edge Evidence: Strengths and Weaknesses of New Digital Investigation Methods in Litigation. Hastings Law Journal 2022;73:1233.

[33] Sumardi D, Lukito R, Ichwan MN. Legal pluralism within the space of Sharia: Interlegality of criminal law traditions in Aceh, Indonesia. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 2021;5:426–49.

[34] Jackson G, Bartosch J, Avetisyan E, Kinderman D, Knudsen JS. Mandatory nonfinancial disclosure and its influence on CSR: An international comparison. Journal of Business Ethics 2020;162:323–42.

[35] Khisni A. Law lnto the National Legislation. Transformation 2020;12:1275–81.

[36] Hamid A. Analysis of the importance of omnibus Law Cipta Kerja in Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management 2020;8:236–50.

[37] Rezky MA, Yulianingsih W. The Effectiveness Of Implementing Mediation Of Different Religious Cases In The Surabaya State Court. IN-PROLEGURIT 2022;2:371–82.

[38] Ahmad K. The Petrial Institutions in the Perspective of Judge’s Independence, Corruption Eradication Commission and Human Rights: A Juridical-Empirical Study according to Indonesian Legal System. Scholars Journalof Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences 2021;9:655–65.

[39] Broyde MJ, Ives E. Religious Alternative Dispute Resolution in Israel and Other Nations with State-Sponsored Religious Courts: Crafting a More Efficient and Better Relationship Between Rabbinical Courts and Arbitration Law in Israel. TouRo L REv 2020;36:901.