Character of Educational Leadership: A Critical Educational Study of Leadership in Local Wisdom

Abstract

This research critiques the practice of educational leadership and explains leadership in Balinese local wisdom. Leadership in schools is the managerial activity of the principal in carrying out the educational process. School management in Bali generally adapts leadership styles in the Western theory. However, is rarely understood in Balinese local wisdom and has the concept of leadership appropriate to socio-cultural conditions and education in Bali. This qualitative research uses data analysis techniques: data reduction, data presentation, and data verification. Based on the research findings, the concept of Balinese local wisdom leadership is full of values and religious character. Balinese local wisdom requires leaders to know their character and to form good leaders’ attitudes and behaviors. In comparison, Geguritan Niti Rajasesana has the concepts of catur pariksa, brata nembelas, and satya, the principle of leading. In the Geguritan Dharma Sesana text, there is a concept of 12 principles for leaders. The concept of leadership does not directly discuss leadership in education but is relevantly integrated into the management of education and organization by school principals in Bali. This study aims to strengthen the concept of educational leadership based on local wisdom and can be a reference for studies related to educational leadership.


Keywords: educational leadership, local wisdom, principal, leadership character

References
[1] Liu S, Hallinger P. Principal Instructional Leadership, Teacher Self-Efficacy, and Teacher Professional Learning in China: Testing a Mediated-Effects Model. Educ Adm Q. 2018;54(4):501–28.

[2] Cooper KS, Stanulis RN, Brondyk SK, Hamilton ER, Macaluso M, Meier JA. The teacher leadership process: attempting change within embedded systems. J Educ Change. 2016;17(1):85–113.

[3] Printy S, Liu Y. Distributed Leadership Globally: The Interactive Nature of Principal and Teacher Leadership in 32 Countries. Educ Adm Q. 2021;57(2):290–325.

[4] Boies K, Fiset J. I Do as I Think: Exploring the Alignment of Principal Cognitions and Behaviors and Its Effects on Teacher Outcomes. Educ Adm Q. 2019;55(2):225–52.

[5] Poon-McBrayer KF. School leaders’ dilemmas and measures to instigate changes for inclusive education in Hong Kong. J Educ Change. 2017;18(3):295–309.

[6] Meyer A, Hartung-Beck V, Gronostaj A, Krüger S, Richter D. How can principal leadership practices promote teacher collaboration and organizational change? A longitudinal multiple case study of three school improvement initiatives. J Educ Change. 2022;: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-022-09451-9.

[7] Anderson SE, Mascall B, Stiegelbauer S, Park J. No one way: differentiating school district leadership and support for school improvement. J Educ Change. 2012;13(4):403–30.

[8] Leo U, Wickenberg P. Professional norms in school leadership: change efforts in implementation of education for sustainable development. J Educ Change. 2013;14(4):403–22.

[9] Goleman D. Leadership The Power of Emotional Intellegence. 1st ed. Northampton (MA): More Than Sound; 2011.

[10] Shaked H, Schechter C. Systems Thinking for School Leaders: Holistic Leadership for Excellence in Education. Champ: Springer Cham; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-53571-5..

[11] Eacott S. Educational leadership relationally: A theory and methodology for educational leadership, management and administration. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-911-1.

[12] Kelly R. Constructing leadership 4.0: Swarm leadership and the fourth industrial revolution. Champ: Palgrave Macmillan Cham; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-98062-1..

[13] Kumar S. Courageous Leadership: The Missing Link to Creating a Lean Culture of Excellence. New York: Productivity Press; 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315102252.

[14] Tomlinson H. Educational leadership: Personal growth for professional development. 1st ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2004. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247150.

[15] Thompson B. Gender, Management and Leadership in Initial Teacher Education: Managing to Survive in the Education Marketplace? London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49051-3.

[16] Mercer J, Barker B, Bird R. Human Resource Management in Education: Contexts, themes and impact Justine. 1st ed. London: Routledge; 2010. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850817.

[17] Nurabadi A, Irianto J, Bafadal I, Juharyanto J, Gunawan I, Adha MA. Juharyanto, Gunawan I, Adha MA. The effect of instructional, transformational and spiritual leadership on elementary school teachers’ performance and students’ achievements. Cakrawala Pendidikan. 2021;40(1):17–31.

[18] Harsoyo Y, Astuti CW, Rahayu CW. Competency and values of local wisdom of high school principals. Cakrawala Pendidikan. 2019;38(3):565–77.

[19] Sukendar A, Usman H, Jabar CS. Teaching-loving-caring (asah-asih-asuh) and semimilitary education on character education management. Cakrawala Pendidikan. 2019;38(2):293–305.

[20] Agastia IB. Pertemuan Ida Pedanda Made Sidemen dan Cokorda Mantuk Ring Rana. Denpasar: Yayasan Dharma Sastra; 2012.

[21] Johnson RB, Christensen L. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. 5th ed. United States of America: SAGE Publication, Inc.; 2014.

[22] Merriam SB. Qualitative research : a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009.

[23] Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications; 2014.

[24] Hunt T, Fedynich LC. Leadership: Past, Present, and Future: An Evolution of an Idea. Journal of Arts and Humanities. 2019;8:20–6.

[25] Benmira S, Agboola M. Evolution of leadership theory. BMJ Lead. 2021;5:3–5.

[26] Spector BA. Carlyle, Freud, and the Great Man Theory more fully considered. Leadership. 2016;12(2):250–60.

[27] Colbert AE, Judge TA, Choi D, Wang G. Assessing the trait theory of leadership using self and observer ratings of personality: the mediating role of contributions to group success. Leadersh Q. 2012;23(4):670–85.

[28] Kanodia R, Sacher A. Trait theories of leadership. International Journal of Scince Technology and Management. 2016;5:121–33.

[29] Foti RJ, Allgood SF, Thompson NJ. Trait Theory of Leadership. Encyclopedia of Management Theory 2013:882–8. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452276090.

[30] Northouse PG. Leadership: theory and practice. 7th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2016.

[31] Vergauwe J, Wille B, Hofmans J, Kaiser RB, De Fruyt F. The double-edged sword of leader charisma: understanding the curvilinear relationship between charismatic personality and leader effectiveness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Jan;114(1):110–30.

[32] Benefiel M, Fry LW, Geigle D. Spirituality and religion in the workplace: History, theory, and research. Psychol Relig Spiritual. 2014;6(3):175–87.

[33] Strand R. A systems paradigm of organizational adaptations to the social environment. Acad Manage Rev. 1983 Jan;8(1):90–6.

[34] Methot JR, Melwani S, Rothman NB. The Space Between Us: A Social-Functional Emotions View of Ambivalent and Indifferent Workplace Relationships. J Manage. 2017;43(6):1789–819.

[35] Nasiri M, Saunila M, Rantala T, Ukko J. Sustainable innovation among small businesses: the role of digital orientation, the external environment, and company characteristics. Sustain Dev (Bradford). 2022;30(4):703–12.

[36] Budhisantoso S, Purna IM, Yunus A, Wibisono S, Soeloso. Niti Raja Sasana. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan; 1990.

[37] Sanjaya P, Suarka IN, Indiani NM. Hindus Leadership Teaching In Geguritan Niti Raja Sasana. Vidyottama Sanatana. International Journal of Hindu Science and Religious Studies. 2020;4(1):12–9.

[38] Sukabawa IW. Asas-Asas Kepemimpinan Hindu Dalam Lontar Niti Raja Sasana. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu. 2019;3(2):135–43.

[39] Lillejord S, Børte K. Middle leaders and the teaching profession: building intelligent accountability from within. J Educ Change. 2020;21(1):83–107.

[40] Ni Y, Yan R, Pounder D. Collective Leadership: Principals’ Decision Influence and the Supportive or Inhibiting Decision Influence of Other Stakeholders. Educ Adm Q. 2018;54(2):216–48.

[41] Hauge TE, Norenes SO, Vedøy G. School leadership and educational change: tools and practices in shared school leadership development. J Educ Change. 2014;15(4):357–76.

[42] Andreoli PM, Klar HW, Huggins KS, Buskey FC. Learning to lead school improvement: an analysis of rural school leadership development. J Educ Change. 2020;21(4):517– 42.

[43] Epitropaki O, Radulovic AB, Ete Z, Thomas G, Martin R. Leader-follower transgressions, relationship repair strategies and outcomes: A state-of-the-science review and a way forward. Leadersh Q. 2020;31(1):101376.

[44] Kosfeld M. The role of leaders in inducing and maintaining cooperation: The CC strategy. Leadership Quarterly 2020;31:0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.04.002..

[45] Mumford MD, Todd EM, Higgs C, McIntosh T. Cognitive skills and leadership performance: the nine critical skills. Leadersh Q. 2017;28(1):24–39.

[46] Pietsch M, Tulowitzki P, Koch T. On the Differential and Shared Effects of Leadership for Learning on Teachers’ Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction: A Multilevel Perspective. Educ Adm Q. 2019;55(5):705–41.

[47] Van de Calseyde PP, Evans AM, Demerouti E. Leader decision speed as a signal of honesty. Leadersh Q. 2021;32(2):101442.

[48] Chandler JA, Johnson NE, Jordan SL, B DK, Short JC. B DK, Short JC. A meta-analysis of humble leadership: reviewing individual, team, and organizational outcomes of leader humility. Leadersh Q. 2023;34(1):101660.

[49] Cheng JT, Gerpott FH, Benson AJ, Bucker B, Foulsham T, Lansu TA, et al. Eye gaze and visual attention as a window into leadership and followership: A review of empirical insights and future directions. Leadersh Q. 2022;101654:101654.

[50] Decuypere A, Verdorfer AP. Leader Attentive Communication: A new Communication Concept, Validation and Scale Development. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2022;29(4):424–42.

[51] Farahnak LR, Ehrhart MG, Torres EM, Aarons GA. The Influence of Transformational Leadership and Leader Attitudes on Subordinate Attitudes and Implementation Success. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2020;27(1):98–111.

[52] Campos-Moreira LD, Cummings MI, Grumbach G, Williams HE, Hooks K. Making a Case for Culturally Humble Leadership Practices through a Culturally Responsive Leadership Framework. Hum Serv Organ Manag Leadersh Gov. 2020;44(5):407–14.

[53] Kirsch J, Raut S, Alvarez-Padilla Y, Maleku A. The Forgotten Human Service Sector: Leadership Narratives of Immigrant and Refugee-Led Community-Based Ethnic Organizations. Hum Serv Organ Manag Leadersh Gov. 2023;00(3):1–18.

[54] Bishop L, Coombs A, Domaguin D, Hernandez N, Higgs E, McGhee T, et al. Developing policy and management leaders: eight social work policy fellows sharetheir experiences, case studies, and recommendations for leadership development. Hum Serv Organ Manag Leadersh Gov. 2018;42(3):245–50.

[55] Woulfin SL. Fusing Organizational Theory, Policy, and Leadership: A Depiction of Policy Learning Activities in a Principal Preparation Program. J Res Leadersh Educ. 2017;12(2):166–75.

[56] Møller MØ, Hill M. Performance Measurement and Professional Decision making: A Resolvable Conflict? Hum Serv Organ Manag Leadersh Gov. 2021;45(5):1–26.

[57] Gurr D, Drysdale L. System leadership and school leadership. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership. 2018;3(2):207–29.

[58] Şahin F. The Role of School Administrators in Organizational Learning Processes. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership. 2021;6(4):833–68.

[59] Tinaztepe C, Özer F, Kiziloğlu M, Yozgat U. The Relationship Between Knowledge Sharing And Negative Attitude Against Employee Monitoring. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi. 2012;7:93–102.

[60] Pan HL, Chen WY. How principal leadership facilitates teacher learning through teacher leadership: determining the critical path. Educ Manage Adm Leadersh. 2020;49(3):1–17.

[61] Charoensap A, Virakul B, Senasu K, Ayman R. Effect of Ethical Leadership and Interactional Justice on Employee Work Attitudes. J Leadersh Stud. 2018;12(4):7–26.

[62] Wilson J, North M, Morris D, McClellan R. Rethinking Implicit Leadership Theories: Tomorrow’s Leaders are Collective, Generative, and Adaptive. J Leadersh Stud. 2020;14(3):24–32.

[63] Orsini CA, Simon NW. Reward/Punishment-Based Decision Making in Rodents. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2020 Sep;93(1):e100.

[64] de Vel-Palumbo M, Twardawski M, Gollwitzer M. Making sense of punishment: Transgressors’ interpretation of punishment motives determines the effects of sanctions. Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jul;62(3):1395–417.

[65] Guo L, Yang H, Luan K, Luo Y, Sun L, Zheng X. A trust management model based on mutual trust and a reward-with-punishment mechanism for cloud environments. Concurr Comput. 2021;33(16):1–20.

[66] Lee A, Thomas G, Martin R, Guillaume Y, Marstand AF. Beyond relationship quality: the role of leader–member exchange importance in leader–follower dyads. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2019;92(4):736–63.

[67] Krishnakumar S, Houghton JD, Neck CP, Ellison CN. The “good” and the “bad” of spiritual leadership. J Manag Spiritual Relig. 2015;12(1):17–37.

[68] Fairholm MR, Gronau TW. Spiritual leadership in the work of public administrators. J Manag Spiritual Relig. 2015;12(4):354–73.

[69] Lean ER, Ganster DC. Is there a common understanding of spiritual leader behaviors? J Manag Spiritual Relig. 2017;14(4):295–317.

[70] Arsana IGKG, Suasta IBM, Mayun IB. Dharma Sasana. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan; 1993.

[71] Jacobs GA, Longbotham GJ. The impact of spirituality on the formation of a leader’s purpose. J Manag Spiritual Relig. 2011;8(1):69–91.

[72] Smith SG. Responsibility in religiosity. Relig Stud. 2021;57(2):249–65.

[73] Nagashima J, Gibbs NP. Sensegathering and iteration: the evolution of a character education framework in higher education. J Moral Educ. 2022;51(4):518–34.

[74] Day J. Everyday practices of toleration: the interfaith foundations of peace accords in Sierra Leone. Politics Relig. 2021;14(1):54–82.