Divergency of Deprivation of Independence and Restrictions of Freedom in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia
Abstract
Criminal law has various sanctions and is considered ’effective’ as an effort to prevent, handle, and deal with criminal acts. The concept of sentencing is divided into three theories, and all of them contain elements that limit the freedom rights of a person who commits a criminal act.Therefore, it is very interesting to discuss the divergence of deprivation of independence and limitation of freedom in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. The focus of this research is the study of deprivation of freedom and limitation of freedom in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. The type of research used is normative legal research, where the approach to the problem is a statute approach, conceptual approach, comparative approach, case approach. Deprivation of freedom or restriction of freedom can be interpreted not only as a prison sentence but can be defined as a restriction of freedom in all forms. Restrictions on freedom, eats everything that regulates behavior, activities, and obliges someone to do something, eats can be defined as restrictions on freedom. Limitation of freedom is a broad definition, imprisonment is one type of restriction of freedom, as well as other crimes if there is control or restriction on someone.
Keywords: deprivation of independence, restrictions of freedom, Indonesia criminal justice
References
[1] Aulia S. Penanganan Kasus Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) Oleh Berencana Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Dan Pemberdayaan Perempuan (BKBPMPP)Kabupaten Sleman. University Of Bengkulu Law Journal 2019;4:153–63.
[2] Sulistiani SL, Sy ME. Hukum Adat Di Indonesia. Bumi Aksara; 2021.
[3] Tahali A. Hukum Adat Di Nusantara Indonesia. Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum 2018;5:27–46.
[4] Ali M. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika; 2022.
[5] Ehlers D, Becker U. European fundamental rights and freedoms. Walter De Gruyter; 2007.
[6] Amanda A. Legality of corruption eradication commission’s authority in arresting operations against corruption cases based on Indonesian procedural criminal code. Law Research Review Quarterly 2019;5:113–22.
[7] Sapardjaja KE. Artikel Kehormatan: Kajian Dan Catatan Hukum Atas Putusan Pra- Peradilan Nomor 04/Pid. Prap/2015/PN. Jkt. Sel Tertanggal 16 Februari 2015 Pada Kasus Budi Gunawan: Sebuah Analisis Kritis. PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM ( JOURNAL OF LAW) 2015;2.
[8] Nusi HS. Penangkapan Dan Penahanan Sebagai Upaya Paksa Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana. Lex Crimen 2016;5.
[9] Detrick S. A Commentary on the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1999.
[10] Marzuki S, Riyadi E. Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Hak Asasi Manusia Universitas Islam Indonesia 2008.
[11] Sinaga NA. Criminal responsibility of children who commit the crime of allowing, ordering to do or participating in violence against children until death based on Indonesian Criminal Law. International Journal of Science and Society 2023;5:464– 79.