Download fulltext HTML
Nayuf, H. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and the Issues of Creation, Sentience, and Consciousness: A Teo-ethnographic Perspective. KnE Social Sciences, 9(2), 1229–1237. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i2.14938

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i2.14938

statistics

  • 182 Abstract Views
  • 107 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

Published Date

  • Jan 3, 2024

Artificial Intelligence and the Issues of Creation, Sentience, and Consciousness: A Teo-ethnographic Perspective

KnE Social Sciences / 3rd International Conference on Humanities Education, Law and Social Sciences (3rd ICHELSS) / Pages 1229–1237

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has colored human civilization. It is the ability of a digital computer or computer-controlled robot to perform general tasks associated with specific patterns of intelligence. AI is not human, but it possesses intelligence similar to humans, and it can even inform or perform tasks that humans cannot. Artificial intelligence is used in various fields, ranging from education, healthcare, economy, to agriculture. Artificial intelligence is the product of human creation, sentiment, and consciousness. It is the result of human intelligence itself. AI can answer questions and provide intelligent recommendations for humans. With its algorithmic capabilities, AI can analyze billions of signals and make precise recommendations. At this level, artificial intelligence represents human intelligence. However, the question is whether artificial intelligence has sensitivity, sentiment, empathy, and solidarity toward the humans who created it. Or does artificial intelligence then transform into a director of human beings in their self-actualization? Using a phenomenological approach, this research aims to explore the phenomenon of the presence of artificial intelligence, which offers convenience for human work, but at the same time, the presence of AI reduces the value of humans who possess creative intuition, sentiment, and consciousness. Yet AI is born from the ability of humans to create, feel, and think. The results of this exploration are then given a theological and ethnographic perspective (teo-ethnography).


Keywords: artificial intelligence, creation, sentiment, consciousness, teo-ethnography

References
[1] Nasution MK. Ulasan konsep tentang kecerdasan buatan, Artificial Intelligence. 2019:14.

[2] dan H, Haqqi HW. Revolusi Industri 4.0 di tengah Society 5.0:Sebuah Integrasi Ruang, Terobosan Teknologi, dan Transformasi Kehidupan di Era Distruptif. Anak Hebat Indonesia; 2019.

[3] Hardiman FB. Aku klik maka aku ada: Manusia dalam Revolusi Digital. Yogyakarta: Penerbit PT Kanisius; 2021.

[4] Daulay M. Filsafat fenomenologi: Suatu pengantar. Medan: Panjiaswaja Press; 2010.

[5] Helaluddin. Mengenal lebih dekat dengan pendekatan fenomenologi: Sebuah penelitian kualitatif. Uin Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. 2018;(March):1–15.

[6] Simon ID, John C. Pata ’Alo, Prastika, Katiandagho, Julio, Tumbade, Kurniawan C, Lakaba. Deradikalisasi di konteks sulawesi selatan dengan dialogical self theory. Yogyakarta: STT INTIM Press - Komojoyo Press; 2021.

[7] Rachmawati Y. Pendidikan karakter melalui pengembangan model pembelajaran RKCK (rasa karsa cipta karya). J. Pendidik. Anak. 2015;1(1):21–30.

[8] Neonbasu G. Sketsa dasar mengenal manusia dan masyarakat: Pintu masuk antropologi. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas; 2020.

[9] Snijders A. Manusia: Paradoks dan seruan, antropologi filsafat. Yogyakarta: Penerbit PT Kanisius; 2004.

[10] Kasali R. Disruption, Kesebelas. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama; 2019.

[11] Sudibyo A. Jagat Digital: Pembebasan dan Penguasaan, Kedua. Jakarta: KPG (Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia; 2021.

[12] Pabubung R. Michael, ‘Human Dignity’ Dalam Pemikiran Yohanes Paulus Ii Dan Relevansi Untuk Dunia Masa Kini. J. Teol. 2021;10(1):49–70.

[13] Pana L. Artificial Intelligence and Moral intelligence. TripleC. 1970;4(2):254–264.