Principal's Leadership Style and Influence Workload Against Teacher Performance
Abstract
This study attempts to examine teacher performance as influenced by the principal’s leadership and workload. This study seeks to reveal the effect of the principal’s leadership style and workload on teacher performance. While the specific target to be achieved in this research is to serve as information material in the development of science, especially in the field of education and teacher training. The approach used is quantitative with the type of associative research. This study focuses on three variables, namely the principal’s leadership style (variable X1), teacher workload (X2), and teacher performance (Y). All state high school teachers in Makassar City were used as the study population. As many as 163 of the total population were used as research samples taken using proportional random sampling technique. Data was collected using questionnaires, observation, and documentation techniques. Data were obtained through a questionnaire instrument and analyzed using inferential statistics. The results of the data analysis show: 1) the principal’s leadership style has a positive and significant effect on teacher performance; 2) workload has a positive and significant effect on teacher performance; 3) the principal’s leadership style and teacher’s workload together have a positive and significant influence on teacher performance.
Keywords: leadership, workload, teacher performance
References
[1] Shulman LS. Teacher Development: Roles of Domain Expertise and Pedagogical Knowledge. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2000;21(1):129–35.
[2] Khan Z, Khan UA, Shah RU, Iqbal J. Instructional Leadership, Supervision and Teacher Development. Dialogue Can Philos Assoc. 2009.
[3] Coiduras JL, Blanch À, Barbero I. Initial teacher education in a dual-system: addressing the observation of teaching performance. Stud Educ Eval. 2020;64:100834.
[4] Finsterwald M, Wagner P, Schober B, Lüftenegger M, Spiel C. Fostering lifelong learning–Evaluation of a teacher education program for professional teachers. Teach Teach Educ. 2013;29:144–55.
[5] Elliott K. Teacher performance appraisal: more about performance or development? Aust J Teach Educ. 2015;40(9):102–16.
[6] Copur-Gencturk Y, Doleck T. Linking teachers’ solution strategies to their performance on fraction word problems. Teach Teach Educ. 2021;101:103314.
[7] Malhotra M, Yu SY, Lakshmipathy N, Rajkumar A, Goyal C. A fuzzy analysis of teacher’s attitude affect student’s performance and personality development. Mater Today Proc. 2021;: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.497.
[8] Jacob BA, Rockoff JE, Taylor ES, Lindy B, Rosen R. Teacher applicant hiring and teacher performance: evidence from DC public schools. J Public Econ. 2018;166:81– 97.
[9] Saleh S, Alimuddin M, Arismunandar M, Ansari M. The profile implementation of academic supervision head of school basic in Ulaweng Sub-Districts. Bone District; 2020. https://doi.org/10.2991/icss-18.2018.214.
[10] Shen J, Ma X, Mansberger N, Wu H, Palmer LA, Poppink S, et al. The relationship between growth in principal leadership and growth in school performance: the teacher perspective. Stud Educ Eval. 2021;70:101023.
[11] Sergiovanni TJ. Leadership as pedagogy, capital development and school effectiveness. Educational Management. Major Themes in Education; 2013.
[12] Joharis M. The effect of leadership, organizational culture, work motivation and job satisfaction on teacher organizational commitment at senior high school in Medan. Int. J. Bus. Manag. Invent. 2016;5(10):1–8.
[13] E. Nopitasari and H. Krisnandy, “The Influence of Democratic Leadership Style, Intrinsic Motivation and Work Discipline on Employee Performance at PT Pangansari Utama Food Industry.,” J. Ekon. Manaj., 2018.
[14] U. Iskandar, “Leadership of the principal in improving teacher performance,” J. Educator’s vision of science, vol. 10, no. 1, 2013.
[15] Indajang K, Jufrizen J, Juliandi A. The Influence of Organizational Culture and Principal Leadership on Teacher Competence and Performance at the Sultan Agung Pematangsiantar College Foundation. JUPIIS J. Educator. Social Sciences. 2020;12(2):393–406.
[16] Blase J, Blase J. Effective instructional leadership Teachers’ perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. J Educ Adm. 2000;38(2):130– 41.
[17] Blase J, Blase J. Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers’ perspectives. Educ Adm Q. 1999;35(3):349–78.
[18] Elacqua G, Marotta L. Is working one job better than many? Assessing the impact of multiple school jobs on teacher performance in Rio de Janeiro. Econ Educ Rev. 2020;78:102015.
[19] Mustofa, “Efforts to Develop Teacher Professionalism in Indonesia,” J. Ekon. dan Pendidik., 2012, https://doi.org/10.21831/jep.v4i1.619..
[20] S. Saleh, R. Emiliani, M. Nasrullah, S. H. Arhas, and M. Takdir, “Creativity in Teaching Teachers in the Department of Office Administration Automation at SMK Nurul Qalam Makassar,” J. Off., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 225–232. https://doi.org/10.26858/jo.v7i2.24734.
[21] S. Saleh and M. Nasrullah, “The Effect of Lecturer Teaching Discipline on Student Learning Motivation in the UNM Office Administration Education Study Program,” 2019.
[22] U. C. Reitzug, “Images of principal instructional leadership: From supervision to collaborative inquiry,” J. Curric. Superv., 1997.
[23] S. Saleh, “Principal Academic Supervision (a model of supervision in Teacher Working Groups).” UNM Publishing Agency.
[24] Al Rasyid H. Teacher Working Group Functions for Elementary School Teacher Professional Development. School. Base; 2015.