Application of the SAVI Model in Learning to Listen to Short Stories
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to describe: (1) the components of short story listening skills, (2) the ability to listen after using the SAVI learning model; (3) the level of effectiveness of using the SAVI Model to teach students to listen to elements of short stories. It is a design that imagines a pseudo-experiment. The study population includes 20 students from class X. Cluster sampling was used, and pre- and posttest procedures were employed. Descriptive and inferential statistical approaches were used to analyze the data. As a result, (1) the ability to hear short story elements before the SAVI model is classified as low, (2) the ability to hear short story elements before the SAVI model is classified as high, and (2) the SAVI model showed an ability to hear elements of short stories before being classified as high. (3) The SAVI model applies effectively to learning story elements with tcount > ttable or 11.88 > 2.0414 at the 0.05 significance level. Based on the results of this study, the following suggestions are made: (1) Indonesian language and literature learning, especially literature listening, should be further improved by always providing students with short story listening training. (2) Teachers must use innovative teaching methods and learn to listen to elements of short stories. (3) To further improve their skills, students should actively practice listening to elements of short stories.
Keywords: short stories, SAVI model, listening
References
[1] Meier D. The accelerated learning handbook: A creative guide to designing and delivering faster, more effective training programs. 2000.
[2] Tarigan HG. Menyimak: Sebagai suatu keterampilan berbahasa. 1986.
[3] Azis A. Cerita pendek: Sebagai bahan ajar. Bandung: STKIP Siliwangi; 2012.
[4] Azis A. Menulis poster dan slogan melalui penerapan metode pembelajaran berbasis masalah (Problem based learning): Suatu alternatif peningkatan keterampilan menulis. Semantik; 2012. p. 1.
[5] Nurgiyantoro B. Penilaian dalam pengajaran bahasa dan sastra. No Title; 2001.
[6] Aminudddin MP, Suryana H. Pengantar apresiasi karya sastra. PT Sinar Baru Algensindo; 2000.
[7] Azis A, Hajrah H, Suarni S. Pemanfaatan strategi critical incident dalam pembelajaran menulis cerpen (The critical incident strategy in learning to write short stories). Sirok Bastra. 2019;7(2):195–206.
[8] Juanda A, Rosdianto K. Intisari bahasa dan sastra Indonesia untuk SMA. 2007.
[9] Schoenfeld AH. When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of’welltaught’mathematics courses. Educational Psychology. 1988;23(2):145–166.
[10] Borko H, Mayfield V. The roles of the cooperating teacher and university supervisor in learning to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education. 1995;11(5):501–518.
[11] Summers M, Corney G, Childs A. Teaching sustainable development in primary schools: An empirical study of issues for teachers. Environmental Education Research. 2003;9(3):327–346.
[12] Reich J, Buttimer CJ, Coleman D, Colwell RD, Faruqi F, Larke LR. What’s lost, what’s left, what’s next: Lessons learned from the lived experiences of teachers during the 2020 novel coronavirus pandemic. 2020.
[13] Sofianidis A, Meletiou-Mavrotheris M, Konstantinou P, Stylianidou N, Katzis K. Let students talk about emergency remote teaching experience: Secondary students’ perceptions on their experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences. 2021;11(6):268.
[14] Afsyah S. WhatsApp application in English Language Teaching (ELT) context: Media to describe people. Utamax : Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education. 2019;1(1):23–28.
[15] Dewi PY, Primayana KH. Effect of learning module with setting contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts. International Journal on E-Learning. 2019;1(1):19–26.
[16] Schuck RK, Lambert R. “Am I doing enough?” Special educators’ experiences with emergency remote teaching in Spring 2020. Education Sciences. 2020;10(11):320.