Legal Construction of Asset Recovery for Crime of Corruption in Indonesia
Abstract
Indonesia has made efforts to prevent and eradicate criminal acts. However, the reality is that corruption is still a problem in Indonesia. Corruption occurs in various aspects of state life and institutions, not only central government institutions but also regional governments. Corruption has bad impacts ranging from lowering the level of people’s welfare, destroying morality, and the foundations of national resilience. As time goes by, acts of corruption are carried out in various ways and are increasingly organized. More strategic efforts are needed to deal with this because corruption does not only talk about criminal acts and the perpetrators but is also related to the results of that corruption. The first question is how is corruption in Indonesia today? Second, what is the proper legal reconstruction to deal with it? Then to answer these problems, this research was made using an analytical descriptive method and a normative juridical approach by adding a set of data, one of which was from the n Vivo application. According to this study, there is still a lot of corruption in Indonesia, and because the state must also receive the benefits of criminal acts of corruption, there is a need for special rules that can carefully monitor in order to carry out asset recovery.
Keywords: construction, corruption asset recovery
References
[1] Republik, UUD 1945, vol. 105, no. 3. 1945, pp. 129–133.
[2] Hamzah A. Perbandingan Pemberantasan Korupsi Diberbagai Negara, Ke-2. Jakarta: Media Grafika, 2005.
[3] Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. 4th ed. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka; 2016.
[4] Feitosa F. Theoretically, yes, but also empirically? How the corruption-turnout link is marginally explained by civic duty to vote. Elect Stud. 2020;66(May):102162.
[5] Wakefield E, Gatenby H. The advanced learner dictionary of current English, 2nd ed. AS Hornby.
[6] Pope J. Panduan Transparency International, 2002: Strategi Memberantas Rasuah, Elemen Sistem Integrasi Nasional. Jakarta: Transparency International dan Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2003.
[7] Shinkai HF. Hiroyuki. Woltring, Mendekati Analisis dalam Konteks Antarabangsa, Menanggapi Rasuah: Pertahanan Sosial, Rasuah, dan Perlindungan Pentadbiran Awam dan Kemerdekaan Keadilan, 13th ed. Itali: International Conggres on Social Defense Lecce (Itali), 2000.
[8] Gabrielle M. “Ketua KPK: Kasus Korupsi Terbesar di Pemerintah Daerah,” Berita Satu Sindo news, Jakarta, 2023.
[9] Juliani RD, Lubis S. “Pengembalian aset hasil korupsi dan penanggulangan korupsi melalui penyitaan non-conviction based asset forfeiture : tinjauan hukum Indonesia dan united nations convention against corruption (UNCAC) 2003,” vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 273–280, 2023.
[10] Putri RA. “Optimalisasi Peran Bantuan Hukum Timbal Balik dalam Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 33–57, 2020, https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.1.33-57.
[11] Vol JR. “DINAMIKA BARU DALAM PEMULIHAN ASET AKIBAT KORUPSI DI INDONESIA Rosita Miladmahesi 1.” 2020;22(1):14–31.
[12] November- D, Syam MH, Marlina A. “Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Ahli Waris Asset Recovery Corruption by the Heirs,” 2022.
[13] Analysis A, Number D, Sus P, Pn T, Mahmud A. “PROBLEMATIKA ASSET RECOVERY DALAM PENGEMBALIAN PROBLEMATICS OF ASSET RECOVERY IN,” 2018.
[14] Recovery M, Hasil A, Pidana T, Kebijakan A, Pidana H. RECOVERY ASSET HASIL TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM. 2015. pp. 74–92.
[15] Prakarsa A. “Model Pengembalian Aset (Asset Recovery) Sebagai Alternatif Memulihkan Kerugian Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Aliyth Prakarsa dan Rena Yulia*”. 2017;6(275):31–45.
[16] Hukum F, Batam UI. “Penyitaan Hasil Korupsi Melalui Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara,” vol. 5, no. 7, 2023.
[17] Sitepu RI, Hermawan R. Pendekatan Restorative Justice Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. 2019;1(3):11–8.
[18] Cover J. Table Of Content Article information............................................ Rechtsidee. 2021;9:1–10.
[19] Widyantara MM, Hukum F, Warmadewa U, Pengembalian P. PROSEDUR PENGEMBALIAN DAN PEMULIHAN KERUGIAN NEGARA. 2022;3(1):68–74.
[20] Halim D. “PPATK Nilai Upaya Asset Recovery dari Hasil Tindak Pidana Belum Optimal,” Kompas.com, Jakarta, Feb. 2021.
[21] Aset P, Tindak H, Di P. Urgensi pembentukan undang-undang perampasan aset hasil tindak pidana di indonesia the urgency of assets recovery act in indonesia. 2015. pp. 17–30.
[22] Efendi J. Jonaedi. Ibrahim, Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. 1st ed. Depok: Prenamedia Group; 2018.
[23] Marzuki PM. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: PT. Kharisma Putra Utama, 2017.
[24] Rachman T, Raspati L. Menakar Makna Merugikan Perekonomian Negara Dalam Undang-Undang Tipikor. Nagari Law Rev. 2021;4(2):225.
[25] Marbun AN. “Kepatuhan Indonesia terhadap Konvensi Anti-Rasuah,” Prisma, vol. 37, no. 3, 2018.
[26] Prabowo HY. Reinvigorating the human instrument: an exploratory study on the potential use of CAQDAS in qualitative evaluation of corruption prevention in Indonesia. J Financ Crime. 2020;27(2):505–30.
[27] Hulu S. PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA ATAS TINDAKAN DISKRESI PEJABAT PEMERINTAHAN YANG BERINDIKASI ADANYA PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG. Masal. Huk. 2018;47(2):167.
[28] Dihni VA. Tren Kerugian Negara akibat Korupsi Meningkat dalam 5 Tahun Terakhir. Databoks; 2022.
[29] Annur CM. Ada 1.351 Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Ditangani KPK Sepanjang 2004 hingga 2022. Databoks; 2023.
[30] Renggong R. HUKUM PIDANA KHUSUS. Jakarta: Prenada Media; 2017.
[31] Suraji, “Sejarah Panjang Korupsi di Indonesia dan Upaya Pemberantasannya,” Kebijak. dan Adm. Publik, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 230–238.
[32] DPR. Undang-Undang RI No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Negara Republik Indonesia; 1999. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol13.no6.1001.
[33] DPR. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Negara Republik Indonesia; 2001.
[34] KPK. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta, Indonesia: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi; 2002. p. 42.
[35] Agung KM. PERMA_01_2020. pdf. Indonesia, 2020.
[36] Prayoga Hutama Syam A. “Effectiveness of Sela’s Decision in Article 96 Law Number 2 of 2004 on the resolution of industrial relations disputes.” KnE. Soc Sci. 2022;2022(14):485–96.
[37] Skandiva R, Harefa B. Urgensi Penerapan Foreign Bribery Dalam Konvensi Antikorupsi di Indonesia. Integritas J. Antikorupsi. 2022;7(2):245–62.
[38] Rohidin, “Aborsi dalam perspektif hukum positif dan hukum islam,” hukum online. 2020.
[39] Sekretariat Jenderal, “Indra Iskandar Pastikan Surpres RUU Perampasan Aset Telah Diterima DPR,” 08-05-2023, 2023.
[40] Sucipto TI. “RUU Perampasan Aset Harus Diharmonisasi dengan UU Korupsi, Narkotika dan Terorisme,” mediaindonesia.com, 2023.