Transformation of Mortgage Rights Registration by Electronic System

Abstract

On entering the digital era, the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency introduced electronic land services, including electronic mortgage rights. To facilitate investment needs by applying for bank loans and to improve mortgage rights services in meeting the principles of transparency, timeliness, speed, convenience, effectiveness, and efficiency. This research aims to describe and analyze the arrangement of electronic mortgage rights system services, and the advantages and disadvantages faced by the organizers and users of the electronic mortgage rights system services. The type of research used is descriptive normative legal research. Secondary data were analyzed qualitatively. For the conclusion deductive logic was used. The research results showed that the types of services in the electronic mortgage rights system include registration of mortgage rights, transfer of mortgage rights, change of creditor name, and cancellation of liability electronically integrated mortgage rights service mechanisms. The land deed officials, creditors, and the land office experienced problems while registering mortgage rights in the electronic system. There are advantages and disadvantages to an electronic mortgage rights system. There are unclear settings. It is proposed that the rules regarding electronic mortgage rights must be revised regarding the improvement period for electronic mortgage rights applications. The provisions of Article 10 paragraph (3) of the Mortgage Rights Law cannot be implemented because the Electronic Mortgage Rights are based on land data that has been legalized and registered with the local land office. The provisions of Article 10 paragraph (3) of the Mortgage Rights Law must accommodate.


Keywords: mortgage rights, registration, electronic system, advantages, disadvantages

References
[1] Arie Hutagalung, Dinamika Pemikiran Tentang Pembangunan Hukum Tanah Nasional, Jakarta, Penerbit Universitas Trisakti. 2012.

[2] Mukhidin, Achmad Irwan Hamzaniet. Problems of electronic mortgage implementation for the banking activities. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. 2022; 22(1).197-206.

[3] Edsa Zahra F, Wiryani F. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pemenang Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan atas Adanya Perlawanan Pihak Ketiga (Derden Verzet).” Indones Law Reform J. 2021 Jul;1(2):184–196.

[4] Juliana Evawati. Asas Publisitas Pada Hak Jaminan Atas Resi Gudang. Yuridika. 2014; 29(2).233-244.

[5] Alfi Hidayat, Sukanda Husin, Ulfanora. Legal protection for the creditor as the mortgage holder for granting loan using collateral land and building against badloan debtor. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. 2019;6(3).766-774.

[6] Artisa Wahyu Nurkhayati, Optimalisasi Informasi Hak Tanggungan Elektronik Melalui Sosialisasi Kepada Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Pada Akun Media Sosial Kantor Pertanahan Kota Tangerang Selatan. Pelatihan Dasar CPNS Golongan II Angkatan XIX Pusat Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Kementerian Agraria Dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional. 2022;12.1-173.

[7] Damar Sagari. Efektivitas Layanan Hak Tanggungan Terintegrasi Secara Elektronik Di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Klaten. Jurnal Tunas Agraria 2022; 5(1).1-65.

[8] I Wayan Jody Bagus Wiguna. Tinjauan Yuridis Terkait Pendaftaran Hak Tanggungan Secara Elektronik. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan. 2020;5(1).79-87

[9] Nurul Nadira. Pendaftaran Hak Tanggungan Elektronik yang Akan Mulai dilaksankan di Badan Pertanahan. Fairness and Justice: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum. 2019;17(2).162-165.

[10] Nadia Imanda. Lahirnya Hak Tanggungan Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Agraria Tentang Pelayanan Hak Tanggungan Terintegrasi Secara Elektronik. Notaire: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan. 2020;3(1).151-164.

[11] Rahmadi, Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian, Antasari Press, 2011;70.

[12] Soerjono Soekanto, Sri Mamuji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers 2021;17.

[13] Dyah Devina Maya Ganindra, Faisal Kurniawan. Kriteria Asas Pemisahan Horizontal Terhadap Penguasaan Tanah Dan Bangunan. Yuridika. 2017;32(2).228-259.

[14] Boedi Harsono, Hukum Agraria Indonesia Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria Isi Dan Pelaksanaanya. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Trisakti. 2013.10

[15] Urip Santoso. Pembebanan Hak Sewa Untuk Bangunan Atas Tanah Hak Milik: Perspektif Asas Dan Pembuktian. Yuridika. 2018;33(20).330-348.

[16] Angela Melani Widjaja, Vincencius Gegap Widyantoro, Elsa Indira Larasati. Lavenia Nadya Irianti, Raden Ajeng Cendikia Aurelie Maharani. Tanggung Gugat terhadap Pembebanan Hak Tanggungan atas Tanah Beserta Benda yang Akan Ada Berupa Gedung. Jurnal Mercatoria. 2020;13(2).107-117.

[17] Maria. S.W Sumardjono, Prinsip Dasar dan Beberapa Isu Di Seputar Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti. 1996;67.

[18] Agata Tri Putri Margaret, Sapardiyono Sapardiyono. Pelaksanaan Layanan Hak Tanggungan Terintegrasi Secara Elektronik. Jurnal Widya Bhumi. 2021;1(2).136-148.

[19] Pandam Nurwulan. Implementasi Pelayanan Hak Tanggungan Elektronik Bagi Kreditor dan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah. Ius Quia Iustum. 2021;28 (1).183-202.

[20] Deni Ahmad Hidayat. Persiapan Pelayanan secara Online Menghadapi Era Digitalisasi’, Universitas Trisakti. 2020;5.

[21] Stiawan Nurdin. Efektifitas Pelayanan Hak Tanggungan Secara Elektronik Yang Dilakukan Oleh PPAT Dan Kreditur (Bank) (Studi Kasus Pada PPAT Junaidi, dan PT. BPR. Segara Anak Kencana. Yuridica. 2022;4(1).71-86.