The Concept of Pancasila in Guaranteeing the Legal Protection of Indonesian Customary Law Communities

Abstract

The existence and rights of indigenous peoples faced several challenges during this time of rapid development. Indigenous and tribal people are weak and marginalized because of these issues. This is due to how differently everyone participates in positions in communities with customary land and customary law in the framework of life in the country and state based on Pancasila and the constitution. The issue raised in this essay is how to provide progressive legal protection for indigenous and tribal peoples’ existence, while also achieving their welfare. This essay adopts a conceptual approach, with Pancasila serving as the fundamental principle for ensuring the legal protection of indigenous and tribal populations in Indonesia. This essay also makes use of Customary law communities that are protected by the current legal system, which is more static, constrained, and legalistic than it has ever been. The issue of how communities with customary law are acknowledged must be addressed in terms of legal protection. The state should enact laws and procedures to offer legal defense based on instruction and empowerment. These laws and policies are examples of progressive legal theory; they are founded on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, which positions humanity as bringing justice, wealth, and happiness to indigenous and tribal people.


Keywords: Pancasila, Protection, Customary, law

References
[1] Anggraeny I. “Legal review of selling land of inheritance without approval of all heirs.” Leg J Ilm Huk. 2020. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v28i1.11817.

[2] Jimly A. Ideologi, Pancasila dan Konstitusi, http://jdih.ristekdikti.go.id/v0/?q=system/ files/perundangan/1927202140.pdf, h. 2. diakses tanggal 3 Februari 2020.

[3] Arief BN, Pembangunan SH. Indonesia. Semarang: Pustaka Magister; 2012.

[4] Boedi H, Hukum AI. Isi dan Pelaksanannya. Jakarta: Djambatan; 2005.

[5] Hidayat A. “Negara Hukum Berwatak Pancasila”, Materi Seminar Yang Disampaikan Dalam Rangka Pekan Fakultas Hukum 2017 Universitas Atmajaya Yogyakarta, bertempat di Gedung Bonaventura Universitas Atmajaya Yogyakarta, pada tanggal 9 September 2017. Indrati Farida Maria., Ilmu Perundang-udangan Jenis, Fungsi dan Materi Muatan, Yogyakarta : Kanisius.

[6] Bernhard L, Pertanahan P. Jakarta : Margaretha Pustaka, 2014.

[7] Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono Luthfi Wida, “Quo Vadis Pancasila sebagai Norma Konstitusi yang Tidak Dapat Diubah”. Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 16, Nomor 3, September 2019.

[8] Sumardjono MS. Kebijakan Pertanahan Antara Regulasi dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Buku Kompas; 2009.

[9] Nurhasan I. “Arah Politik Hukum Pertanahan dan Perlindungan Kepemilikan Tanah Masyarakat.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Volume 1, Nomor 1, Januari-April, 2012.

[10] Nomor PM. 3/PUU-VIII/2010 https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/putusan_3- puu-viii-2010_(pengelolaan_ pesisir_pulau-pulau_kec.pdf, diakses 30 November 2022.

[11] Risalah SP. 31/PUU-V/2007, https://mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/risalah/ risalah_sidang_Perkara%2031%20%20PUU%20V%202007%2018%20Juni% 202008.pdf, diakses tanggal 30 November 2022.

[12] Maria R. Sesat Pikir Politik Hukum Agraria Membongkar Alas Penguasaan Negara Atas Tanah-Tanah Adat. Yogyakarta: Insist Press, KPA dan Pustaka Pelajar; 2000.

[13] Rahardjo S, Progresif PH. Jakarta : Kompas, 2010.

[14] Arief SB, Hukum RT. Sebuah Penelitian Tentang Fundasi Kefilsafatan dan Sifat Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Landasan Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju; 2009.

[15] Sidharta. Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing; 2013.

[16] Kurnia W. “Peta Perundang-undangan tentang Pengakuan Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat”, https://procurement-notices.undp.org/view_file.cfm?doc_id=39284, h. 4. diakses tanggal 30 November 2022.

[17] Yusriyadi. “Paradigma Sosiologis dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia”, Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar Dalam bidang Sosiologi Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Tanggal 18 Februari 2006.