Sarawak's Claim on the State's Jurisdiction over Oil and Gas on the Continental Shelf: A Legal Historical Perspective
Abstract
This paper aims to conduct a preliminary re-evaluation of the claim made by the Government of Sarawak regarding its jurisdiction over oil and gas on the continental shelf. The basis of Sarawak’s claim is rooted in the pre-Malaysia status quo of state territory, which was established through the Alteration of Boundaries of 1954. This proclamation extended the borders of the state to include the continental shelf adjacent to its coast, ensuring the state’s rights to natural resources, including oil and natural gas. However, this research questions the legality of the 1954 law based on the context of legal history. It appears to be incompatible with the 1958 Geneva Convention on the High Seas and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. These conventions provide the statutory basis for incorporating sea territorial waters beyond three nautical miles and designating Exclusive Economic Zones for specific nations. As such, obtaining jurisdiction over sea territorial waters was the responsibility of the federal government of Malaysia, which acted as the deemed signatory. The research will employ content analysis of relevant secondary sources, as well as selected historical and legal documents. By doing so, it hopes to bring clarity to the legal complexities in the historical context surrounding Sarawak’s claim. The ultimate goal is to redefine the current dimension of the issue and seek an amicable solution to address the jurisdictional matter.
Keywords: Sarawak’s claim, state jurisdiction, state autonomy, oil and gas, continental shelf
References
[1] Hakim AB. Federal Court dismisses, strikes out Petronas application. Borneo Post Online. 2018 June. https://www.theborneopost.com/2018/06/22/federal-courtdismisses- strikes-out-petronas-application/
[2] Anderson D. Modern law of the sea: Selected essays. Leiden: Brill; 2008. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004158917.i-627.
[3] Baker J. An Introduction to English Legal History. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198812609.001.0001.
[4] Bing BJ. The principle of the domination of the land over the sea: A historical perspective on the adaptability of the Law of the Sea to new challenges. German Yearbook of International Law. 2014;(57):1–32.
[5] Braverman I, Johnson ER, editors. Blue legalities: The life & laws of the sea. Durham, London: Duke University Press; 2020. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1131dk7
[6] Chakraborty A. Dispute settlement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and its role in Oceans Governance [LLM Thesis]. Faculty of Law, Victoria, University of Wellington. 2006.
[7] Convention on the High Seas 1958, Done at Geneva on 29 April 1958. Entered into force on 30
[8] September 1962. United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 450.
[9] Cook PJ, Carleton CM, editors. Continental shelf limits: The scientific and legal interface. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195117820.001.0001
[10] Corporate News. Sarawak govt ’disappointed’ with decision by Federal Court to postpone hearing on Petronas case. The Star Online. 2018 June 11. https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2018/06/11/sarawakgovt- disappointed-with-decision
[11] DayakDaily. STAR: Petronas has no rights over Sarawak’s petroleum resources. 2017 Nov 20. https://dayakdaily.com/star-petronas-has-no-rights-over-sarawakspetroleum- resources/
[12] Edward C. Victory for Sarawak as Court dismisses Petronas application for judicial review on SST. Borneo Post Online. 2020 March 13. https://www.thebomeopost.com/2020/03/13/victory-for-sarawak-as-court-dismissespetronasapplication- for-judicial-review-on-sst/
[13] Fong JC. Constitutional Federalism in Malaysia. Petaling Jaya: Sweet & Maxwell Asia; 2008.
[14] Free Malaysia Today. Sarawak amends oil ordinance to strengthen regulatory control. 2018 July 10. http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2018/07/10/sarawakamends- oilordinance-to-strengthen-regulatory-control/
[15] Freeman HA. Law of the continental shelf and ocean resources: An overview. Cornell International Law Journal. 1970;3(2).
[16] Yatim H. Petronas and Sarawak withdraw lawsuit against each other on sales taxes. The Edge Markets. 2020 Aug 3. https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/petronaswithdraws- appeal-judicial-review-sarawakalso-withdraws-crossappeal
[17] Harding A. Devolution of powers in Sarawak: A dynamic process of redesigning territorial Governance in a Federal System. Asian Journal of Comparative Law. 2017;12(2):257–279.
[18] Khalilieh HS. Islamic Law of the Sea: Freedom of navigation and passage rights in Islamic thought. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108630702.
[19] Klein N. Maritime security and the Law of the Sea. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199566532.001.0001.
[20] Malaysia Kini: 4 Jun 2018, Petronas cabar dakwaan Sarawak berhubung pemilikan petroleum. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/428153
[21] Madon M. The continental shelf — Five decades of progress (1966-2016). Bul Persatuan Geol Malays. 2017;63( June):145–156.
[22] Morris HG. The continental shelf - an international dilemma. Osgoode Hall Law J. 1958;1(1):2.
[23] Nation. Sarawak to set up taskforce on rights under Malaysia Agreement. The Star Online. 2017 Nov 10. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2017/11/10/sarawak-toset- up-taskforce-on-rightsunder-malaysia-agreement
[24] Quince C. The exclusive economic zone. Wilmington, Malaga, Delaware: Vernon Press; 2019.
[25] Sarawak. Dewan Undangan Negeri Official Reports, Eighteenth Sarawak State Legislative Assembly, Kuching. 2017 November 9.
[26] Ling S. Petronas makes payment of RM2.9 Bil in SST to Sarawak govt. The Star Online. 2020 Sep 17. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2020/09/17/petronasmakes- payment-of-rm29bil-insst-to-sarawak-govt
[27] Ling S. Seeking a resolution to state rights again. The Star Online. 2017 Nov 11. https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/views/2017/11/11/seeking-a-resolution-tostate- rights-againsarawak-wants-amicable-solution-to-outstanding-issues-wit
[28] Suarez SV. The outer limits of the continental shelf: Legal aspects of their establishment. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-540-79858-3
[29] Sukumaran Vanugopal. The Constitutional Rights of Sabah and Sarawak. Subang Jaya: Thomson Reuters Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 2013.
[30] Tanaka Y. The International Law of the Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108545907.
[31] Umpang M. Sarawak ready with London documents to fight Petronas suit -Sharifah Hasidah. Borneo Post Online. 2018 June 18. https://www.theborneopost.com/2018/06/18/sarawak-ready-with-london-documentsto- fightpetronas-suit-sharifah-hasidah/
[32] UNCLOS 1982: United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982, http://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201836/volume-1836-1- 313645
[33] Vecchio AD, Virzo R. (Eds.). Interpretations of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea by International Courts and Tribunals. Switzerland: Springer. 2019.
[34] White GE. American Legal History: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199766000.001.0001
[35] Yang H. Jurisdiction of the coastal state over foreign merchant ships in internal waters and the territorial sea. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/3- 540-33192-1.
[36] Ajamain Z. The Queen’s obligation and intergovernmental committee Report. Kota Kinabalu: BruConn Sdn Bhd; 2015.