How the ESGs Affect Company Branding and Stakeholder Psychology


ESG or the Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria are standards for a company’s operations that socially conscious investors use to screen potential investments. ESG has become a prerequisite for the management of companies to build sustainability apart from the UN Sustainability Development Goals. However, ESG involves compliance, risk management, branding, and psychology. This paper explored how ESG can influence the perception and behavior of various stakeholders, such as customers, employees, suppliers, regulators, and investors. It also focused on how companies can leverage ESG to create a strong and distinctive brand identity to generate competitive advantages. We conducted a qualitative case study of four companies implementing ESG initiatives in different industries and regions. We collected data from multiple sources, such as annual reports, websites, social media, interviews, and surveys. We used thematic analysis to identify the key themes and patterns in the data. We found that ESG can influence the perception and behavior of various stakeholders differently, depending on the context and the type of ESG initiative. We also found that ESG can help companies create a distinctive brand identity that can differentiate them from their competitors and attract more investors. We suggest that managers adopt a strategic approach to ESG that aligns with their vision, mission, values, and goals and effectively communicates their ESG efforts to their stakeholders. We also recommend that researchers should further investigate the mechanisms and outcomes of ESG branding in different contexts and sectors. One of the limitations of our study is that we focused on only four cases, which may not be representative of the whole population of companies that have implemented ESG initiatives. Therefore, future studies could use a more extensive or diverse sample or employ a quantitative or mixed-methods approach to validate or generalize our findings.

Keywords: Brand Identity; ESG; Perception; Market Behavior

[1] Keller KL. Strategic brand management: building, measuring, and managing brand equity. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2013.

[2] McKinsey & Company. Five ways that ESG creates value. [Internet]. 2020. Available from the-role-of-esg-and-purpose

[3] Corporate Finance Institute. What is ESG. Environmental, Social, and Governance. [Internet]. 2022. Available from

[4] Investopedia. Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria Definition. [Internet]. 2021. Available from: and-governance-esg-criteria.asp

[5] American Psychological Association. What is psychology?. [Internet]. 2021. Available from

[6] Aaker DA. Building strong brands. New York: Free Press; 1996.

[7] Kitterman T. 7 highest ranked ESG brands for PR Daily. [Internet]. 2021. Available from:

[8] Bothe B. Council Post: Building Brand Integrity Through ESG Reporting. Forbes [Internet]. 2020. Available from: through-esg-reporting/

[9] Mattison R, de Longevialle B. Key trends that will drive the ESG agenda in S&P Global [Internet]. 2021. Available from: 2022

[10] Lee LE. 2022 ESG Trends to Watch. MSCI [Internet]. 2021. Available from:

[11] Kotler P, Keller KL, Brady M, Goodman M, Hansen T. Marketing Management. 3rd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited; 2018.

[12] Brand P. What Is ESG Marketing? A Sustainable Approach to Drive Brand Awareness. Purpose Brand [Internet]. Available from: sustainable-brand-awareness/

[13] Kell G. The Remarkable Rise Of ESG. Forbes [Internet]. 2018. Available from:

[14] Tripathi S. How to create an ESG centric brand? How to Create an ESG Centric Brand? LinkedIn [Internet]. 2021. Available from: centric-brand-sudhanshu-tripathi

[15] Aaker DA. Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: The Free Press; 1991.

[16] Keller KL. Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity. New Jersey: Pearson Education; 2008.

[17] Kapferer JN. The New Strategic Brand Management: Advanced Insights and Strategic Thinking. Journal of Brand Management: Advanced Collections. 2012;10(2):25– 40.

[18] Ries A, Trout J. Positioning: the Battle for Your Mind. New York: McGraw Hill; 2001.

[19] Kotler P. Marketing Management. London: Pearson; 2002.

[20] Aaker J, Fournier S, Brasel SA. When Good Brands Do Bad. J Consum Res. 2004;31(2):1–16.

[21] Best global Brands [internet]. Interbrand Best Global Brands. Available from:

[22] ESGgo [internet]. A Brief History of ESG. ESGgo. 2016. Available from:

[23] Morningstar. U.S. Sustainable Funds Face Growing Pains in Morningstar Inc. 2021. Available from:

[24] Edelman [Internet]. Edelman Trust Barometer. Edelman. Available from:

[25] Deloitte [Internet]. Esg reporting comprehensive guide. Deloitte. 2021. Available from: reporting-comprehensive-guide.pdf

[26] Friede G, Busch T, Bassen A. ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. J Sustain Finance Invest. 2015;5(1):210–33.

[27] Khan M, Serafeim G, Yoon A. Corporate Sustainability: First Evidence on Materiality. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2015;91(6):182–

[28] Eccles RG, Ioannou I, Serafeim G. The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Manage Sci. 2014;60(21):2835–57.

[29] Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68–78.

[30] Hsieh SH, Chang A. The Psychological Mechanism of Brand Co-creation Engagement. J Interact Market. 2016;33(4):13–26.

[31] Greenwald AG, Banaji MR. Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol Rev. 1995 Jan;102(1):4–27.

[32] Smaldino PE. Social identity and cooperation in cultural evolution. Behav Processes. 2019 Apr;161(1):108–16.

[33] Escalas JE, Bettman JR. Self￿Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning. J Consum Res. 2005;32(4):378–89.

[34] Rosenberg M. Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books; 1986.

[35] Sirgy MJ. Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review. J Consum Res. 1982;9(2):287–302.

[36] Surhone LM, Tennoe MT, Henssonow SF. Nanocellulose: Self-Discrepancy Theory. Beau-Bassin. Betascript Publishing; 2011.

[37] Malar L, Krohmer H, Hoyer WD, Nyffenegger B. Emotional Brand Attachment and Brand Personality: The Relative Importance of the Actual and the Ideal Self. J Mark. 2011;75(2):35–52.

[38] Geschwender JA. Continuities in Theories of Status Consistency and Cognitive Dissonance. Soc Forces. 1967;46(1):160–71.

[39] Swann WB Jr, Stein-Seroussi A, Giesler RB. Why people self-verify. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Mar;62(3):392–401.

[40] Sprecher S, Aron A, Aron E. Love and the Expansion of Self: Understanding Attraction and Satisfaction. Contemp Sociol. 1988;17(2):268–93.