Opportunities and Challenges of Pentahelix Collaboration for Poverty Alleviation in Indonesia: A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
Within the context of poverty reduction, there is a clear tendency for groups or organizations involved in these efforts to continue existing practices or approaches without producing the necessary changes or innovations. We found that the poverty reduction gap occurs when programs or projects that have been carried out together repeatedly fail to deliver the expected results in reducing poverty significantly. Despite the awareness of the need for change through collaboration, they still seem to adhere to old approaches that are familiar, routine, or ineffective. Although the pentahelix model partnership is not an easy solution to difficult societal issues, the public views it as an opportunity and challenge that occasionally frustrates the parties involved and raises public expectations. For practitioners, researchers, and decision-makers, this study identifies trends, possibilities, and problems in the development of a larger pentahelix model network of collaborative knowledge generation.
Keywords: pentahelix collaboration, bibliometric review, poverty alleviation
References
[1] Porter G. NGOs and poverty reduction in a globalizing world: Perspectives from Ghana. Progress in Development Studies. 2003;3(2):131–45.
[2] Nelson DR, Lemos MC, Fakin H, Lo YJ. Limitations of poverty reduction in support of climate change adaptation. Environmental Research Letters. 2016;11(9).
[3] Cheyne C, Belgrave M, O’Brien M. Social policy in Aotearoa. Social Policy J N Z. 1998;25:170–4.
[4] Huxham C, Vangen S, Huxham C, Eden C. The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Mangement: An International Journal of Research and Theory. 2000;2(3):337–58.
[5] Kettl DF. The job of the government: Interweaving public functions and private hands. Public Administration Review. 2015;75(2):219–29.
[6] Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Bloomberg L. Creating public value in practice, advancing the common good in a multi-sector. Shared-power, no-one-wholly incharge world. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18116
[7] Provan KG, Kenis P. Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008;18(2):229–52.
[8] Stuckey JD, Durr B, Thomas GM. Promising practices: A case study review of the partnership less and issues. Partnership Care USA. 2002;59(1).
[9] Pansera M, Martinez F. Innovation in development and poverty reduction: An integrative literature review. Journal of Management Development. 2017;36(1):2–13.
[10] Jones T. Policy coherence, global environmental governance, and poverty reduction. International Environmental Agreements. 2002.
[11] Li S, Wang H. Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, UK. 2018.
[12] Cao QT, Vuong QH, Pham HH, Luong DH, Ho MT, Hoang AD, et al. A bibliometric review of research on international students’ mental health: Science mapping of the literature from 1957 to 2020. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education. 2021 Jul;11(3):781–94.
[13] Podsakoff, MacKenzie SB, Bachrach DG, Podsakoff NP. Influence of management journals in the 1980s and the 1990s. Strategic Management Journal. 2005;26(5):473–88.
[14] Rialti R, Zollo L, Ferraris A, Alon I. Big data analytics capabilities and performance evidence from the moderated mediation model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019;149.
[15] Patarlageanu SR, Dinu M, Constantin M. Bibliometric analysis of green public procurement. Amfiteatru Economic. 2020;22(53):71–81.
[16] F. Bjork. Pentahelix: Conceptualizing cross-sector collaboration and social innovation processes. Urbinnovate. Blogg.mah.se. 2015.
[17] Calzada I. Democratising smart cities? Pentahelix multistakeholder social innovation framework. Smart Cities. 2020.
[18] Halibans AS. The pentahelix model of innovation in Oman: An Hei perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management. 2017;12:159– 72.
[19] Leydesdorff L, Etzkowitz H. Triple helix of innovation: Introduction. Science and Public Policy. 1998;25(6):358–64.
[20] Hidayah SA, Wahyunengseh RD. Collaborative governance Untuk Pengembangan sustainable green tourism Sebagai Upaya Pengentasan Kemiskinan. Wacana Publik. 2021;1(2):431.
[21] Muhyi HA, Chan A. The pentahelix collaboration model in developing the center of flagship industry in Bandung city. Review of Integrative Business and Economic Research. 2017;6(1).
[22] Budhi MK, Lestari NP, Suasih NN. The recovery of the tourism industry in Bali province through a pentahelix collaboration strategy in the new normal. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites. 2022;40(1):167–74.
[23] Deri F, Rahma W, Dede, Asep S. The concept of quadruple helix collaboration and quintuple helix innovation as solutions for post Covid-19 economic recovery. MIX Jurnal Ilmiah. https://doi.org/10.22441/jurnal_mix.2022.v12i3.005
[24] Firmansyah D, Suryana A, Rifa’i AA. Hexa helix Kolaborasi quadruple helix dan quintuple helix innovation sebagai Solusi untuk Pemulihan ekonomi pasca Covid-19. KUITAS. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2022.v6.i4.4602